VIDA’s third annual survey of female representation at several prominent print publications — “The Count” — was released on March 4. For the third year in the row, the number of male bylines and works by male writers reviewed vastly outnumbered those of women almost across the board, and a look at all data from all three years indicated that things haven’t improved over time (in fact, at several publications, the percentage of women represented decreased between 2011 and 2012). In previous years, VIDA demanded better from those publications. This time, it seemed to meet the results with a resigned sigh.
“As always, the charts tell their own stories, whether publishers and editors listen or not. And now their histories are showing,” wrote Amy King, calling out Harpers, The Nation, The New Republic, New York Review of Books, The Paris Review, and the Times Literary Supplement for “their gross (& indecent) neglect of female writers’ work.”
VIDA numbers echoed those in the Women’s Media Center’s recent report on gender disparity in American media, which WMC said was at “crisis levels.”
“The facts cannot be denied; little has changed,” Jen Fitzgerald, VIDA’s count director, told CJR in an email.
Looking at those numbers and charts, that certainly appears to be so. VIDA’s frustration is understandable. But there are other signs that things are starting to change and more publications are making real efforts to diversify bylines.
For Tin House editor Rob Spillman, VIDA’s count was the impetus to make a change. This year, the quarterly literary magazine was one of the few publications VIDA singled out for praise. As Spillman told Flavorwire’s Emily Temple, because his staff was equally comprised of men and women, “We thought we were gender-blind. However, the numbers didn’t bear this out.”
Tin House did some research and found that it received more submissions from men than women by about 2:1. On top of that, men whose pitches were rejected were five times more likely to pitch again than women. That leaves Tin House with far fewer reliable, regular female freelancers. The editors who are content to sit and wait for the pitches to come to them and to draw from the same stable of writers for every issue will continue to see unequal representation in their publications year after year.
The New Republic’s online book review editor, Chloe Schama, noticed similar trends. Men “pitch with a much greater frequency” than women, she said, which can put the onus on the editor to reach out to female writers and ensure that both genders are equally represented. Frankly, not all editors have the time, desire, or ability to do that.
Incidentally: It should be noted that because VIDA only counts print publications, Schama’s efforts were not reflected in the The New Republic’s tally. Jen Fitzgerald explained the reasoning behind this: “The internet is fluid; content appears, disappears and changes. Also, appearing in print holds more weight professionally than appearing online.”
That’s too bad, as Schama said the ratio of male to female bylines since she began her position last summer is much closer to parity than bylines in the print publication (where, according to VIDA, of 88 book reviewers in 2012, just nine were women). “There is more hope in the digital space than those numbers would indicate,” Schama said.
Again, that’s as long as there are editors who, like Schama and Spillman, make the effort to find and cultivate new talent that is representative of the population. Rachel Sklar, co-founder of Change the Ratio and TheLi.st, two organizations that work to increase female visibility and representation in the media, said many editors’ “default settings” when looking for writers “favor networks of white dudes.”
“Changing defaults requires effort and requires prioritizing,” she continued, but it’s also “legitimately great for the bottom line.” And there’s the “added bonus that people like me will stop bugging them.”
So:
If you’re a female writer looking for work: pitch! Pitch like Geena Davis’s sister in A League of Their Own. And if a publication turns you down, pitch something else.

I did not realize there were any journalists left.
The Cable networks all admit, they have no journalists.
As far as I can tell there are only a handful of true journalists still working.
Perhaps you mean reports, not journalists.
#1 Posted by Tim Scholes, CJR on Mon 18 Mar 2013 at 09:17 AM
The DoubleThink and DoubleSpeak in this piece is truly astounding.
There is zero difference between men and women. NONE. Anyone who disagrees is a woman hating bigot. Men and women journalists are different. Any editor who fails to see this plain fact and undertake the additional effort to attract more women contributors, understand that they don't 'pitch' as often, etc. and publish out more female writers, regardless of quality, is a bigot, straight up. After all, quality is an outmoded artifact of the patriarchy, right?
The last line in the article is the only one that isn't stupid. If ya want to play in the big leagues, ya gotta get in there and pitch. And most will miss, so when that happens don't get all bent, just try again. But if all you do is miss, maybe ya ain't ready for the big leagues, so play in the minors a few more years instead of whining discrimination quite so fast.
#2 Posted by John Morris, CJR on Mon 18 Mar 2013 at 01:55 PM
John,
It would appear from your comment about the "last line" of the article that you didn't read the whole thing. That was the "last line" of the first page. The article continues on the second page, which you can see if you click on the "2" on the bottom right or just click "one page" to see the full article on one page.
I look forward to your comments once you've read the entire piece!
#3 Posted by Sara Morrison, CJR on Tue 19 Mar 2013 at 11:30 AM
Check out the Women's Media Center's SheSource - we have a database of hundreds of media experienced women experts who are ready to be interviewed. The Women's Media Center makes women and girls more visible and powerful in the media. http://www.shesource.org
#4 Posted by Kate McCarthy, CJR on Fri 22 Mar 2013 at 02:34 PM