<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">

    <title>Columbia Journalism Review</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.cjr.org/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.cjr.org/The Kicker-atom.xml" />
    <id>tag:www.cjr.org,2011-09-12://4</id>
    
    <updated>2012-12-13T20:26:13Z</updated>
    
    <subtitle>Columbia Journalism Review: The future of media is here</subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Pro 4.34-en</generator>
    

<entry>
    <title>The making of a meme   </title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.cjr.org/united_states_project/the_making_of_a_meme.php" />
    <id>tag:www.cjr.org,2012://4.33073</id>

    <published>2012-12-11T20:04:09Z</published>
    <updated>2012-12-13T20:26:13Z</updated>

    <summary>Journos get on board the Let&#8217;s-Whack-Entitlements train
</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Trudy Lieberman</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Campaign Desk" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="United States Project" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <category term="entitlements" label="Entitlements" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="fiscalcliff" label="Fiscal Cliff" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="medicare" label="Medicare" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="simpsonbowles" label="Simpson-Bowles" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="socialsecurity" label="Social Security" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.cjr.org/">
        Shortly after the election, the MSM quickly turned from the presidential horse race to the &#8220;fiscal cliff.&#8221; And soon, news outlets began passing along what has become conventional political wisdom in the Beltway&#8212;that something must be done about the deficit, and fast, and that cutting entitlements, namely Social Security and Medicare, must be part of any deficit-reduction package. Hardly a
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Cracking open Congress</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.cjr.org/united_states_project/why_the_fiscal_cliff_needs_better_insider_reporting.php" />
    <id>tag:www.cjr.org,2012://4.33037</id>

    <published>2012-12-07T16:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2012-12-07T15:55:36Z</updated>

    <summary>We need better insider reporting about the &quot;fiscal cliff&quot;</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Brendan Nyhan</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Campaign Desk" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="United States Project" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <category term="fiscalcliff" label="fiscal cliff" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="newyorktimes" label="New York Times" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="politico" label="Politico" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.cjr.org/">
        We&apos;ve just finished an election in which quantitative analysis provided far more accurate predictions than pundits and reporters, who frequently offered claims and analysis that were not informed by high-quality poll averages or basic political science. As a result, traditional journalists are licking their wounds and trying to re-evaluate how they can add value to campaign coverage. Almost as quickly,
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Healthcare expert for sale</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.cjr.org/united_states_project/healthcare_expert_for_sale.php" />
    <id>tag:www.cjr.org,2012://4.33026</id>

    <published>2012-12-06T19:50:00Z</published>
    <updated>2012-12-11T16:09:21Z</updated>

    <summary>The Guardian follows the saga of Liz Fowler, healthcare lobbyist extraordinaire</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Trudy Lieberman</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Campaign Desk" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="United States Project" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <category term="affordablecareact" label="Affordable Care Act" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="guardian" label="Guardian" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="healthcare" label="healthcare" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="medicare" label="Medicare" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.cjr.org/">
        Leave it to the Brits to tell us Americans about our healthcare system. In this case the telling is done by Guardian columnist Glenn Greenwald (an American, by the way), who takes us back into the world of revolving-door lobbyists&#8212;the ones who come from industry, do a stint of government service for much lower pay, and then when it&#8217;s kosher
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>The rush to handicap 2016: let&apos;s not</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.cjr.org/united_states_project/the_rush_to_handicap_2016_lets.php" />
    <id>tag:www.cjr.org,2012://4.33008</id>

    <published>2012-12-05T11:50:26Z</published>
    <updated>2012-12-05T15:43:55Z</updated>

    <summary>&quot;Dr. Politics&quot; advice&#8212;avoid horse-race journalism, but bring on the well-reported profiles</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Walter Shapiro</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Campaign Desk" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="United States Project" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <category term="horseracejournalism" label="horse-race journalism" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="presidentialpolitics2016" label="Presidential Politics 2016" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.cjr.org/">
        Dear Dr. Politics, I am writing about a problem that has become as annoying as stores playing Christmas carols while they are still selling Halloween candy. Three days after the election, Politico was already out with a major story emblazoned with this headline: &#8220;2016 Election: Hillary Clinton vs. Jeb Bush?&#8221; Even though Politico seems obsessed with jumping the calendar three
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Carney&#8217;s conspiracy theory</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.cjr.org/the_observatory/susan_rice_keystone_xl_investm.php" />
    <id>tag:www.cjr.org,2012://4.32994</id>

    <published>2012-12-04T16:00:56Z</published>
    <updated>2012-12-04T22:13:22Z</updated>

    <summary>White House Press Secretary sees GOP operatives in good journalism</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Curtis Brainard</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Campaign Desk" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="The Observatory" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <category term="benghazi" label="Benghazi" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="canada" label="Canada" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="conflictsofinterest" label="conflicts of interest" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="keystonexl" label="Keystone XL" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="obama" label="Obama" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="oil" label="oil" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="politics" label="politics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="susanrice" label="Susan Rice" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="tarsands" label="tar sands" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.cjr.org/">
        Last week, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney blamed GOP operatives for revealing that Susan Rice, President Obama&#8217;s presumed favorite to become the next Secretary of State, has significant investments in the Canadian oil industry. &#8220;I would commend Republican opposition researchers for the intellectual bandwidth that is required to read a financial disclosure form,&#8221; he said, when asked about Rice&#8217;s
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>NBC News sets good example for Medicare reporting</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.cjr.org/campaign_desk/nbc_news_sets_good_example_for.php" />
    <id>tag:www.cjr.org,2012://4.32973</id>

    <published>2012-11-30T19:50:00Z</published>
    <updated>2012-11-30T20:01:12Z</updated>

    <summary>People perspective leads to clear explanation of impact of proposed changes</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Trudy Lieberman</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Campaign Desk" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <category term="medicare" label="Medicare" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="nbc" label="NBC" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.cjr.org/">
        As tax and spending talks grind on in Washington, The New York Times tells us Friday that in his latest proposal, President Obama has &#8220;embraced $400 billion in savings from Medicare and other entitlements to be worked out next year with no guarantees.&#8221; Guarantees or not, that means the reporters on the Medicare beat will have plenty to report on
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>In Pennsylvania, a niche site with wide reach</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.cjr.org/united_states_project/politicspa_drives_political_coverage_in_pennsylvania.php" />
    <id>tag:www.cjr.org,2012://4.32967</id>

    <published>2012-11-30T16:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2012-11-30T16:13:11Z</updated>

    <summary>PoliticsPA drives political conversation in Keystone State</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ken Knelly</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Campaign Desk" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="United States Project" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.cjr.org/">
        PENNSYLVANIA &#8212; Whether it is a presidential swing state or not, Pennsylvania is always a political battleground. With countless boroughs, school districts, the state legislature, and more in a near-constant state of electing, there is never a shortage of campaign news. What there can be is a shortage of boots on the ground, particularly those with broader statewide perspectives. So
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>The future of factchecking</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.cjr.org/united_states_project/the_future_of_factchecking.php" />
    <id>tag:www.cjr.org,2012://4.32951</id>

    <published>2012-11-29T19:50:00Z</published>
    <updated>2013-01-17T02:03:14Z</updated>

    <summary>Here&apos;s what journalists should learn from the 2012 campaign</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Brendan Nyhan</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Campaign Desk" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="United States Project" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.cjr.org/">
        As journalists close the books on 2012 and look forward to coverage of a second Obama administration, one important question is where the factchecking movement goes from here. The general election campaign was unquestionably the most intensively factchecked in history. While factchecking did not eliminate falsehoods from our politics, this was always an unrealistic expectation. The relevant question is whether
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Can people afford to lose their Social Security COLA?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.cjr.org/united_states_project/can_people_afford_to_lose_thei.php" />
    <id>tag:www.cjr.org,2012://4.32942</id>

    <published>2012-11-29T16:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2012-11-29T15:59:24Z</updated>

    <summary>So far, the press has given this public policy concern the brush off</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Trudy Lieberman</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Campaign Desk" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="United States Project" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.cjr.org/">
        This post is the first of several primers on Social Security we will publish in the coming weeks to help journalists report on this topic. The Washington Post, whose news columns and opinion pieces have beat the drum for entitlement reform and cutting the federal deficit, banged out an editorial Sunday making a case for changing the way the cost-of-living
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>What if there are fewer polls in 2016?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.cjr.org/united_states_project/fewer_polls_in_2016.php" />
    <id>tag:www.cjr.org,2012://4.32928</id>

    <published>2012-11-27T21:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2013-01-17T01:47:27Z</updated>

    <summary>Is the editor-in-chief of Gallup&#8217;s warning a nightmare vision or&#133; sort of beguiling?</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Walter Shapiro</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Campaign Desk" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="United States Project" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.cjr.org/">
        As a feud, it does not rise to the level of Lyndon Johnson versus Bobby Kennedy or even Jack Benny&#8217;s radio war with Fred Allen. But, still, anyone organizing a post-election panel discussion might be wise to put a few chairs between New York Times polling guru Nate Silver and Frank Newport, the editor-in-chief of Gallup. The triggering events were
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>&apos;Resetting&apos; The Plain Dealer</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.cjr.org/united_states_project/resetting_the_plain_dealer.php" />
    <id>tag:www.cjr.org,2012://4.32913</id>

    <published>2012-11-27T11:50:00Z</published>
    <updated>2012-11-27T12:46:01Z</updated>

    <summary>What&#8217;s to become of Cleveland&#8217;s daily, a bright spot in Ohio&apos;s coverage of election 2012?</summary>
    <author>
        <name>T.C. Brown</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Campaign Desk" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="United States Project" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.cjr.org/">
        OHIO &#8212; The frenzy of presidential candidates and entourages overrunning the Buckeye State is history, but questions about how Ohio&#8217;s largest newspaper will cover future political campaigns loom large. Managers of The Plain Dealer of Cleveland&#8212;the 19th largest newspaper in the nation and the place I spent 17 years covering Ohio politics and government&#8212;are primed to make a major announcement
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Closer look at a cash cow</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.cjr.org/united_states_project/closer_look_at_a_cash_cow_in_denver_kusa.php" />
    <id>tag:www.cjr.org,2012://4.32908</id>

    <published>2012-11-26T12:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2012-11-26T11:59:30Z</updated>

    <summary>Denver&apos;s KUSA says newsroom&apos;s &quot;Truth Tests&quot; set high bar for campaign-ad vetting</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Mary Winter</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Campaign Desk" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="United States Project" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.cjr.org/">
        COLORADO &#8212; Barack Obama wasn&#8217;t the only winner in the 2012 campaign here. The state&#8217;s TV stations&#8212;especially those in Denver, the dominant media market&#8212;did pretty well, too. Political groups spent roughly $86 million on election ads in this battleground state, Denver Post TV critic Joanne Ostrow reported earlier this month. According to Ostrow&#8217;s source&#8212;an anonymous &#8220;knowledgeable local TV source&#8221;&#8212;perhaps $68
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>In Michigan, a look back on the 2012 campaign</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.cjr.org/united_states_project/detroit_news_michigan_radio_reporters_reflect_on_2012_election.php" />
    <id>tag:www.cjr.org,2012://4.32902</id>

    <published>2012-11-23T15:45:00Z</published>
    <updated>2012-11-23T15:43:26Z</updated>

    <summary>A veteran journalist and a young reporter talk about lessons learned</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Anna Clark</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Campaign Desk" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="United States Project" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.cjr.org/">
        MICHIGAN &#8212; It was hard. That&#8217;s how Marisa Schultz, political reporter for The Detroit News, sums up the experience of covering her first presidential campaign. Or, to put it another way: &#8220;It was the toughest professional job I&#8217;ve ever done.&#8221; From wading through back-and-forth rhetoric to getting beyond the agenda at campaign events to finding time for deep reporting on
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Key stories in the Keystone State</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.cjr.org/united_states_project/key_stories_in_the_keystone_st.php" />
    <id>tag:www.cjr.org,2012://4.32877</id>

    <published>2012-11-20T21:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2012-11-20T21:03:08Z</updated>

    <summary>Four issues Pennsylvania&#8217;s political press should stay on
 </summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ken Knelly</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Campaign Desk" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="United States Project" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.cjr.org/">
        PENNSYLVANIA &#8212; Political reporters and commentators here will continue to ponder, as the Philadelphia Inquirer did on November 9, Pennsylvania&#8217;s future swing state status. Even so, there are other key issues confronting the Keystone State and its political press corps&#8212;issues that will continue to be clouded by inflamed rhetoric and political money. Here are four evolving stories Pennsylvania&#8217;s political reporters
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Papa John&#8217;s Pizza and the business backlash </title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.cjr.org/united_states_project/papa_johns_pizza_and_the_busin.php" />
    <id>tag:www.cjr.org,2012://4.32871</id>

    <published>2012-11-20T16:15:10Z</published>
    <updated>2012-11-20T16:16:14Z</updated>

    <summary>The real story: how some employers are still working to undermine Obamacare
</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Trudy Lieberman</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Campaign Desk" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="United States Project" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <category term="affordablecareact" label="Affordable Care Act" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="johnschnatter" label="John Schnatter" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="obamacare" label="Obamacare" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="papajohnspizza" label="Papa John&apos;s Pizza" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.cjr.org/">
        The media have latched onto the story of John Schnatter. That&#8217;s the John of Papa John&#8217;s Pizza, a CEO with an Ebenezer Scrooge approach to his employees and customers. He is vowing to reduce employee hours and wages while jacking up the price of his pepperoni pies&#8212;all because of Obamacare. The press has presented the story as sort of funny
    </content>
</entry>

</feed>
