<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">

    <title>Columbia Journalism Review</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.cjr.org/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.cjr.org/Minority_Reports-atom.xml" />
    <id>tag:www.cjr.org,2011-09-12://14</id>
    
    <updated>2013-05-24T01:30:33Z</updated>
    
    <subtitle>Columbia Journalism Review: The future of media is here</subtitle>
    
    

<entry>
    <title>More than just marriage</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.cjr.org/minority_reports/more_than_just_marriage.php" />
    <id>tag:www.cjr.org,2013://14.37682</id>

    <published>2013-05-24T10:50:00Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-24T01:30:33Z</updated>

    <summary>A guide to covering other issues that affect the LGBT community</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jennifer Vanasco</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Minority Reports" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <category term="healthcare" label="healthcare" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="immigration" label="immigration" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="lgbtcommunity" label="LGBT community" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="nychatecrimes" label="NYC hate crimes" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="transgenderrights" label="transgender rights" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.cjr.org/">
        There&apos;s been a diversity of gay news this month covered in the major media, from the rash of NYC hate crimes against gay men, to the story about a Texas lesbian couple forced apart because of a morality clause in one of the partner&apos;s divorce papers, to yesterday&apos;s Boy Scout vote to allow gay youths membership. But too often, the
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Social minority issues in perspective</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.cjr.org/minority_reports/putting_social_minority_issues.php" />
    <id>tag:www.cjr.org,2013://14.37583</id>

    <published>2013-05-17T10:50:00Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-20T07:26:42Z</updated>

    <summary>Recent stories that flesh out important topics</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jennifer Vanasco</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Minority Reports" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.cjr.org/">
        The media covers social minorities regularly in the daily churn of news. A lot of that coverage just skims the happenings of the day--a court win, an activist group announcement, what a controversial figure said on his Twitter feed. But sometimes, reporters are allowed the time and the space to examine a social minority issue in depth, or from an
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>When only The Onion tells it like it is</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.cjr.org/minority_reports/when_only_the_onion_tells_it_l.php" />
    <id>tag:www.cjr.org,2013://14.37535</id>

    <published>2013-05-10T10:50:00Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-09T20:34:06Z</updated>

    <summary>Chris Brown assaulted Rihanna, and most &quot;real&quot; outlets keep overlooking it</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jennifer Vanasco</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Minority Reports" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <category term="chrisbrown" label="Chris Brown" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="domesticviolence" label="domestic violence" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="rihanna" label="Rihanna" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="theonion" label="The Onion" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.cjr.org/">
        The parody newspaper The Onion isn&apos;t a news organization, of course. But once in awhile, it tells a truth that our news organizations don&apos;t. Take, for example, their recent story on Chris Brown. Brown is a double-platinum R&amp;B singer known for his dance moves--and for beating his girlfriend, the singer Rihanna, so badly in 2009 that she went to the
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>How not to report on a transgender victim</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.cjr.org/minority_reports/how_not_to_report_on_a_transge.php" />
    <id>tag:www.cjr.org,2013://14.36868</id>

    <published>2013-05-03T10:50:00Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-03T11:13:40Z</updated>

    <summary>Cemia Acoff identified as a woman in life and should have been in death, too</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jennifer Vanasco</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Minority Reports" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <category term="clevelandplaindealer" label="cleveland plain dealer" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.cjr.org/">
        Sometime between the end of March and the end of April, an Ohio transgender woman was brutally murdered--she was stabbed repeatedly and then tied to a concrete block and cast into a pond. She was left with no clothes below the waist, perhaps to shame her. This crime is heartbreaking and vicious. You would think it could not get worse.
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Where is the media on ENDA?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.cjr.org/minority_reports/where_is_the_media_on_enda.php" />
    <id>tag:www.cjr.org,2013://14.36806</id>

    <published>2013-04-26T10:50:00Z</published>
    <updated>2013-04-25T19:07:17Z</updated>

    <summary>An important bill that would protect gay workers from discrimination gets little media coverage</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jennifer Vanasco</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Minority Reports" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.cjr.org/">
        A bill that is crucial to the civil rights of the LGBT community was reintroduced in both houses of Congress on Thursday, and you probably didn&apos;t hear a thing about it. That&apos;s because the bill isn&apos;t about marriage. If it were a national marriage bill, the media would have been all over it. Heck, if it were just the first
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>In marathon explosion coverage, avoid premature accusations</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.cjr.org/minority_reports/in_marathon_explosion_coverage.php" />
    <id>tag:www.cjr.org,2013://14.36651</id>

    <published>2013-04-18T10:50:00Z</published>
    <updated>2013-04-17T22:04:43Z</updated>

    <summary>It&apos;s easy to assume the perpetrator is muslim, but that&apos;s a harmful thing to do</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jennifer Vanasco</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Minority Reports" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.cjr.org/">
        We don&apos;t know yet who planted the Boston Marathon bombs. Maybe it was a crazy loner. Maybe it was someone affiliated with a right-wing militia group. Maybe it was Islamic jihadists (The Week has a nice rundown of the current theories). In a knowledge vacuum, though, the public will speculate that acts of terror arise from the group they fear
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Leave appearance out of it</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.cjr.org/minority_reports/kamala_harris.php" />
    <id>tag:www.cjr.org,2013://14.36565</id>

    <published>2013-04-12T10:50:00Z</published>
    <updated>2013-04-11T20:08:05Z</updated>

    <summary>Because she isn&apos;t currently a candidate, Obama&apos;s remarks didn&apos;t necessarily hurt Kamala Harris. But if she had been running, a new study says that they would have hurt her</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jennifer Vanasco</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Minority Reports" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <category term="kamalaharris" label="kamala harris" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="kevindrum" label="Kevin Drum" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="motherjones" label="mother jones" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="obama" label="Obama" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="sanjosemercurynews" label="San Jose Mercury News" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="slate" label="Slate" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.cjr.org/">
        I wasn&apos;t planning to write about the dust-up after Obama called California&apos;s Kamala Harris the country&apos;s &quot;best-looking attorney general.&quot; After all, he apologized almost immediately, it happened a week ago, and I thought we could all agree he shouldn&apos;t have done that and then move on. But then I saw this headline: &quot;Kamala Harris&apos; Star Power Buoyed by Obama &apos;Best-Looking
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Tidbits in the news</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.cjr.org/minority_reports/quick_takes_catching_up.php" />
    <id>tag:www.cjr.org,2013://14.36486</id>

    <published>2013-04-05T10:50:00Z</published>
    <updated>2013-04-05T23:55:29Z</updated>

    <summary>Quick takes on social minorities in the recent news cycle</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jennifer Vanasco</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Minority Reports" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <category term="ap" label="AP" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="apstyle" label="AP Style" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="christinequinn" label="Christine Quinn" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="jennawolfe" label="Jenna Wolfe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="lgbt" label="lgbt" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.cjr.org/">
        It seems like every day in the news cycle there is a fascinating tidbit I&apos;d like to cover in Minority Reports. But I only write once a week, so, too often, I have to let those pieces go. I keep a running list of what I&apos;d like to write about but haven&apos;t. Here, in no particular order, are my quick
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Quotas get results</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.cjr.org/realtalk/chris_hayes.php" />
    <id>tag:www.cjr.org,2013://14.36399</id>

    <published>2013-03-28T15:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2013-03-28T15:03:45Z</updated>

    <summary>A chat with MSNBC&apos;s Chris Hayes on tapping sources more diverse than the usual pool of white dudes</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ann Friedman</name>
        <uri>http://www.cjr.org</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="#Realtalk" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Minority Reports" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <category term="chrishayes" label="Chris Hayes" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="msnbc" label="MSNBC" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.cjr.org/">
        Let&apos;s face it: The conversation about diversity in journalism is mostly boring hand-wringing. With each new byline count, it&apos;s easy to despair that gender and ethnic diversity is mostly a pipe dream--a goal that applies more to HR handbooks than actual newsroom practices. But earlier this month, after MSNBC announced it was giving Chris Hayes his own daily primetime news
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Dismal Steubenville coverage</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.cjr.org/minority_reports/rape_case_coverage.php" />
    <id>tag:www.cjr.org,2013://14.36348</id>

    <published>2013-03-22T10:50:00Z</published>
    <updated>2013-03-21T19:03:44Z</updated>

    <summary>The media can, and must, do better when covering assaults</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jennifer Vanasco</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Minority Reports" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.cjr.org/">
        It isn&apos;t just CNN. Over the past few days, there has been a lot of anger directed at the cable network, after a reporter called the two convicted Steubenville rapists &quot;young men that had such promising futures, star football players, very good students&quot; and an anchor seemed to be more sympathetic to the young men than the 16-year-old victim. A
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>More women are needed in investigative journalism</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.cjr.org/minority_reports/need_more_lady_investigative_j.php" />
    <id>tag:www.cjr.org,2013://14.36260</id>

    <published>2013-03-15T10:50:00Z</published>
    <updated>2013-03-14T18:25:28Z</updated>

    <summary>It&apos;s time for the media to counteract institutional barriers to women&apos;s entry in the field</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jennifer Vanasco</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Minority Reports" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <category term="cpj" label="CPJ" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="investigation" label="Investigation" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="women" label="Women" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.cjr.org/">
        In a recent blog post, Lyra McKee tells a story that took place at a feminist-run charity when she was starting off as an investigative reporter (The brackets are McKee&apos;s). One day, we were in their office when the subject of my career post-university came up. &quot;I don&apos;t think you could be an investigative reporter,&quot; one of them said. &quot;You&apos;re
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Writing about powerful women</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.cjr.org/minority_reports/sandberg_and_mayer_arent_all_w.php" />
    <id>tag:www.cjr.org,2013://14.36185</id>

    <published>2013-03-08T11:50:00Z</published>
    <updated>2013-03-07T18:18:01Z</updated>

    <summary>The media should stop treating Sheryl Sandberg and Marissa Mayer as though they represent their whole gender</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jennifer Vanasco</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Minority Reports" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <category term="facebook" label="Facebook" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="marissamayer" label="Marissa Mayer" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="sherylsandberg" label="Sheryl Sandberg" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="yahoo" label="Yahoo" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.cjr.org/">
        Why do we in the media try to make some women standard bearers for all women? That&apos;s the problem, really, that underlies the backlash -- and the backlash&apos;s backlash -- to the leadership of tech executives Sheryl Sandberg and Marissa Mayer. Sandberg and Mayer are very different women who became targets of media attention in the past month for very
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Do we still need a black media?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.cjr.org/minority_reports/black_media_separate_and_equal.php" />
    <id>tag:www.cjr.org,2013://14.36103</id>

    <published>2013-03-04T11:50:00Z</published>
    <updated>2013-03-04T23:20:29Z</updated>

    <summary>A vibrant black media and a more inclusive mainstream media should both be available to the public</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Lori Tharps</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Minority Reports" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <category term="essencemagazine" label="essence magazine" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.cjr.org/">
        At the end of January, I organized and moderated a panel at Temple University&apos;s School of Media and Communications called &quot;Separate But Equal? The Role of the Black Media in the 21st Century.&quot; The title of the panel was deliberately provocative, because I wanted people to consider whether having media outlets that cater to specific ethnic groups was regressive and
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Is the Washington Post pro-gay?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.cjr.org/minority_reports/is_the_washington_post_pro-gay.php" />
    <id>tag:www.cjr.org,2013://14.36097</id>

    <published>2013-02-28T19:50:00Z</published>
    <updated>2013-03-01T20:05:44Z</updated>

    <summary>If they are, it shouldn&apos;t be at the expense of covering anti-gay individuals</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jennifer Vanasco</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Minority Reports" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <category term="gaymarriage" label="gay marriage" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="gayrights" label="gay rights" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="washingtonpost" label="Washington Post" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.cjr.org/">
        Last week, The Washington Post asked itself an interesting question in a headline: &quot;Is The Post Pro-Gay?&quot; Meaning, does it cover the issue of gay marriage fairly, or is it advocating for marriage equality in the guise of news? The ombudsman, Patrick Pexton (today is his last day at the Post), wrote that during his tenure he&apos;s received a &quot;steady
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Behind AP&apos;s new &apos;husband, wife&apos; guideline</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.cjr.org/minority_reports/when_the_ap_appeared_to_be_lim.php" />
    <id>tag:www.cjr.org,2013://14.35972</id>

    <published>2013-02-22T11:50:01Z</published>
    <updated>2013-02-22T04:44:15Z</updated>

    <summary>It&apos;s an attempt to fix a perceived slight to married gay couples</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jennifer Vanasco</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Minority Reports" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <category term="ap" label="AP" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="gaymarriage" label="gay marriage" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.cjr.org/">
        The Associated Press did the right thing on Thursday. After a week in which gay reporters, LGBT blogs, gay advocacy organizations, and even AP reporters expressed dismay at a misguided memo that seemed to say the words &quot;husband&quot; and &quot;wife&quot; didn&apos;t apply to legally married gay couples, the news organization corrected itself with a beautifully simple addition to its Stylebook.
    </content>
</entry>

</feed>