<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>CJR : Politics</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.cjr.org/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.cjr.org/Politics-atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:www.cjr.org,2008://1</id>
    <link rel="service.post" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.cjr.org/movabletype/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1" title="CJR" />
    <updated>2007-10-16T14:55:10Z</updated>
    
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 3.2</generator>
 
<entry>
    <title>The Frost Story</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.cjr.org/politics/the_frost_story.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.cjr.org/movabletype/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=14772" title="The Frost Story" />
    <id>tag:www.cjr.org,2007://1.14772</id>
    
    <published>2007-10-10T19:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2007-10-16T14:55:10Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Bloggers portray a different &quot;reality&quot;</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Paul McLeary</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Politics" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.cjr.org/">
 The fight over a bill calling for a $35 billion increase in funding for the SCHIP program, (passed by both houses of Congress and vetoed by the president last week), which helps states insure uninsured children in need, has been ugly, but over the past few days, it got a whole lot uglier.  The kickoff to the latest...
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Milbank on Blackwater</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.cjr.org/politics/post_62.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.cjr.org/movabletype/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=14759" title="Milbank on Blackwater" />
    <id>tag:www.cjr.org,2007://1.14759</id>
    
    <published>2007-10-03T16:54:00Z</published>
    <updated>2007-10-10T21:43:14Z</updated>
    
    <summary>How WaPo columnist distinguished himself</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Paul McLeary</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Politics" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.cjr.org/">
 It&apos;s hard to find anything new under the sun when cracking open the morning papers to read the accounts of Congressional hearings. Reporters dutifully quote the Congressmen and women asking questions, the witnesses giving answers, and toss in a few words from various outside &quot;experts&quot; to spice things up a bit.   That&apos;s why Dana Milbank&apos;s story...
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Iranian Media Claims Victory</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.cjr.org/politics/post_60.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.cjr.org/movabletype/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=14748" title="Iranian Media Claims Victory" />
    <id>tag:www.cjr.org,2007://1.14748</id>
    
    <published>2007-09-26T18:12:00Z</published>
    <updated>2007-10-02T18:42:03Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Who cares?</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Paul McLeary</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Politics" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.cjr.org/">
 On Monday afternoon, I was asked to do a radio interview reacting to the visit by Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to Columbia University earlier in the day. The host asked if I thought that the Iranian media--in the face of evidence to the contrary--would simply splice together clips of Ahmadinejad&apos;s applause lines and claim victory in the debate. I though...
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>President blogger panel gets mixed results</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.cjr.org/politics/post_55.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.cjr.org/movabletype/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=14731" title="President blogger panel gets mixed results" />
    <id>tag:www.cjr.org,2007://1.14731</id>
    
    <published>2007-09-17T18:28:06Z</published>
    <updated>2007-10-11T20:56:17Z</updated>
    
    <summary>The blogs on the case</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Paul McLeary</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Politics" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.cjr.org/">
 Remember the good old days of the 2004 election season, when the Bush campaign would hold &quot;public&quot; events that were stocked with rabid Bush supporters, and anyone who didn&apos;t unflinchingly back the president was escorted out of the event, or denied entry?  Well, something akin to those good old days went down last week when the White...
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>FUBAR</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.cjr.org/politics/pbs_runs_into_the_fccs_nannyst.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.cjr.org/movabletype/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=14696" title="FUBAR" />
    <id>tag:www.cjr.org,2007://1.14696</id>
    
    <published>2007-08-31T17:11:00Z</published>
    <updated>2007-09-20T16:54:57Z</updated>
    
    <summary>PBS runs into the FCC&apos;s nanny-state regulations</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Paul McLeary</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Politics" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.cjr.org/">
 It&apos;s official, we&apos;ve become a nation of children. And like children, we can&apos;t be trusted to hear nasty swear words--even while watching violent, televised images from a war zone.  Got that? Violence, OK. Bad language, verboten!  On September 23, PBS begins airing Ken Burns&apos; fourteen-hour World War II documentary &quot;The War,&quot; and in interviews with former...
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Krauthammer, Goldfarb, and Emanuel</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.cjr.org/politics/krauthammer_goldfarb_and_emanu.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.cjr.org/movabletype/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=14643" title="Krauthammer, Goldfarb, and Emanuel" />
    <id>tag:www.cjr.org,2007://1.14643</id>
    
    <published>2007-08-10T20:06:48Z</published>
    <updated>2007-09-04T22:39:42Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Getting the TNR mess wrong on purpose</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Paul McLeary</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Politics" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.cjr.org/">
 In the continuing story of Private Scott Beauchamp and the disputed, and partially discredited, &quot;Baghdad Diarist&quot; stories he wrote for The New Republic, there&apos;s yet another wrinkle.  I&apos;m not talking about the debates over the anonymous source who told The Weekly Standard that Beauchamp signed documents stating that he made everything up--something that no one, not even the...
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Obama blames the press</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.cjr.org/politics/obama_blames_the_press.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.cjr.org/movabletype/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=14638" title="Obama blames the press" />
    <id>tag:www.cjr.org,2007://1.14638</id>
    
    <published>2007-08-07T20:27:23Z</published>
    <updated>2007-09-04T22:39:42Z</updated>
    
    <summary>The senator wasn&amp;#8217;t clear on Pakistan, and so he smacks an easy scapegoat</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Gal Beckerman</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Politics" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.cjr.org/">
 As Ben Smith at Politico points out today, Barack Obama has been blaming the media for misrepresenting his position on Pakistan, articulated in his big foreign policy speech last week. &quot;The misreporting that was done needs to be cleared up,&quot; Obama told a Sioux City, Iowa, audience yesterday. &quot;I never called for an invasion of Pakistan.&quot; The original speech...
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Obama Flamed Again</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.cjr.org/politics/obama_flamed_again.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.cjr.org/movabletype/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=14632" title="Obama Flamed Again" />
    <id>tag:www.cjr.org,2007://1.14632</id>
    
    <published>2007-08-03T19:15:01Z</published>
    <updated>2007-09-04T15:13:04Z</updated>
    
    <summary>This time, though, he wuz robbed</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Adrianne Jeffries</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Politics" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.cjr.org/">
 Barack Obama is being pummeled again for his public statements about foreign policy. The candidate told the Associated Press yesterday that he would not use nuclear weapons against Al Qaeda &quot;under any circumstances,&quot; drawing criticism from Hillary Clinton, among others. &quot;Presidents should be careful at all times in discussing the use and nonuse of nuclear weapons,&quot; Clinton said. &quot;Presidents...
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Clinton v. Obama</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.cjr.org/politics/clinton_v_obama.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.cjr.org/movabletype/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=14619" title="Clinton v. Obama" />
    <id>tag:www.cjr.org,2007://1.14619</id>
    
    <published>2007-07-30T19:15:45Z</published>
    <updated>2007-08-27T21:15:36Z</updated>
    
    <summary>The campaign&amp;#8217;s first throw-down is thin stuff </summary>
    <author>
        <name>Gal Beckerman</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Politics" />
            <category term="Top Story" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.cjr.org/">
 Looks like we have ourselves a fight. All three major dailies today have accounts of the rhetorical rumble between Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama over the answers each gave to a question at the CNN/YouTube debate earlier this week. The initial argument, over what value each candidate would place on diplomacy in a future administration, has now been almost...
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>YouTube Debate Has Legs</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.cjr.org/politics/post_34.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.cjr.org/movabletype/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=14618" title="YouTube Debate Has Legs" />
    <id>tag:www.cjr.org,2007://1.14618</id>
    
    <published>2007-07-27T18:20:52Z</published>
    <updated>2007-08-28T00:08:15Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Incredibly weak ones</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Adrianne Jeffries</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Politics" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.cjr.org/">
 Newspapers and bloggers continue to pick over Monday&apos;s YouTube debate, arguably the most sensational story thus far of the campaign season. Unfortunately, much of this afterlife of the debate has centered on an insubstantial back-and-forth between the Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama camps. &quot;For Clinton and Obama, A Debate Point Won&apos;t Die,&quot; reads the Washington Post headline, referring to...
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>TNR And &apos;Scott Thomas&apos;</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.cjr.org/politics/post_31.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.cjr.org/movabletype/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=14610" title="&lt;i&gt;TNR&lt;/i&gt; And 'Scott Thomas'" />
    <id>tag:www.cjr.org,2007://1.14610</id>
    
    <published>2007-07-24T20:03:00Z</published>
    <updated>2007-08-23T17:53:11Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Someone needs to step up with some proof</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Paul McLeary</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Politics" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.cjr.org/">
 By now you&apos;re probably familiar with the flap over whether or not a soldier reportedly serving in Iraq, who has been writing for The New Republic under the pseudonym &quot;Scott Thomas,&quot; has been telling the truth in a series of articles he has produced for the magazine since February.   Thomas&apos; latest &quot;Baghdad Diaries&quot; missive, in which he...
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>The YouTube Debate</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.cjr.org/politics/post_30.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.cjr.org/movabletype/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=14609" title="The YouTube Debate" />
    <id>tag:www.cjr.org,2007://1.14609</id>
    
    <published>2007-07-24T18:18:46Z</published>
    <updated>2007-08-23T17:53:11Z</updated>
    
    <summary>After all the hype, coverage is sober, possibly boring 
</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Adrianne Jeffries</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Politics" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.cjr.org/">
 The arc of the YouTube debate phenomenon is a classic case of what the press does almost reflexively--help build something up (even if just implicitly) only to then tear it down, or at the very least undercut it.   After weeks of anticipatory coverage (it wasn&apos;t all on CNN) that kicked around the titillating question, &quot;Is the YouTube-CNN...
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>NYT, CBS parse new Clinton poll</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.cjr.org/politics/post_29.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.cjr.org/movabletype/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=14605" title="&lt;i&gt;NYT&lt;/i&gt;, CBS parse new Clinton poll" />
    <id>tag:www.cjr.org,2007://1.14605</id>
    
    <published>2007-07-20T19:23:28Z</published>
    <updated>2007-08-14T18:23:56Z</updated>
    
    <summary>In very different ways</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Alexander Heffner</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Politics" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.cjr.org/">
 Today&apos;s New York Times/CBS poll on Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton was reported, as expected, by both outlets. But despite identical data, the stories&apos; ledes drew a stark contrast. (The national poll was conducted between July 9-17 with 1,554 randomly selected adults across party lines.)  The Times headline read &quot;Women Supportive but Skeptical of Clinton, Poll Says.&quot; The...
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Clinton&apos;s Letter to the Pentagon...</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.cjr.org/politics/post_28.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.cjr.org/movabletype/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=14604" title="Clinton's Letter to the Pentagon..." />
    <id>tag:www.cjr.org,2007://1.14604</id>
    
    <published>2007-07-20T18:18:00Z</published>
    <updated>2007-08-14T18:23:56Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Misreported</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Paul McLeary</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Lead Story" />
            <category term="Politics" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.cjr.org/">
 It being summer and all, we realize that a lot of people are basically phoning it in at work, but when it comes to the press, doing half a job can be worse than not doing anything at all. Take the furor that has arisen in the blogosphere and the mainstream media over Defense Undersecretary Eric Edelman&apos;s pathetic response to...
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Smart people gather to talk about politics and the Web, nothing interesting is said</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.cjr.org/politics/smart_people_gather_to_talk_ab.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.cjr.org/movabletype/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=14449" title="Smart people gather to talk about politics and the Web, nothing interesting is said" />
    <id>tag:www.cjr.org,2007://1.14449</id>
    
    <published>2007-05-22T18:37:55Z</published>
    <updated>2007-05-29T16:48:15Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Blogging confabs bring out the smart guys, but few new ideas are ever aired.</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Paul McLeary</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Politics" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.cjr.org/">
 If you&apos;re anything like us, when you get an invitation to attend a day-long event that promises to bring bloggers, Internet activists, journalists, and political activists together under one roof, you think hard about it. But in the end, you go. So it was that I found myself at Pace University in lower Manhattan last Friday for the &quot;Personal Democracy...
        
    </content>
</entry>

</feed> 

