<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">

    <title>Columbia Journalism Review</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.cjr.org/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.cjr.org/The Kicker-atom.xml" />
    <id>tag:www.cjr.org,2011-09-12://14</id>
    
    <updated>2013-05-20T05:45:55Z</updated>
    
    <subtitle>Columbia Journalism Review: The future of media is here</subtitle>
    
    

<entry>
    <title>Audit Notes: WSJ on the IRS, countering Kinsley, Cramer gets an &apos;F&apos;</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.cjr.org/the_audit/audit_notes_wsj_on_the_irs_cou.php" />
    <id>tag:www.cjr.org,2013://14.37627</id>

    <published>2013-05-20T10:50:00Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-20T05:45:55Z</updated>

    <summary>The paper mishandles news on the Tea Party targeting story</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ryan Chittum</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Economic Crisis" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="The Audit" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <category term="austerity" label="austerity" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="jimcramer" label="Jim Cramer" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="michaelkinsley" label="Michael Kinsley" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="teaparty" label="Tea Party" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="thewallstreetjournal" label="The Wall Street Journal" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.cjr.org/">
        Rupert Murdoch must have loved his Wall Street Journal front page on Saturday. Editors splashed this headline across the top of the paper: Higher-Ups Knew of IRS Case Hearing Shows Obama Administration Officials Were Told in June 2012 of Probe Into Tea-Party Targeting Headlines like these, with their dark insinuations, play right into the hands of the paper&apos;s columnists, who
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Peggy Noonan loses it on the IRS story</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.cjr.org/the_audit/peggy_noonan_loses_it_on_the_i.php" />
    <id>tag:www.cjr.org,2013://14.37619</id>

    <published>2013-05-17T10:50:00Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-17T15:52:56Z</updated>

    <summary>The Journal columnist draws an evidence-free connection to the White House</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ryan Chittum</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Economic Crisis" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="The Audit" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <category term="irs" label="IRS" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="peggynoonan" label="Peggy Noonan" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="teaparty" label="Tea Party" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="thewallstreetjournaleditorialpage" label="The Wall Street Journal editorial page" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.cjr.org/">
        We are in the midst of the worst Washington scandal since Watergate. That&apos;s Peggy Noonan today in The Wall Street Journal, and no, she will not be laughed out of Washington. There are papers to sell and clicks to harvest. Forget about the fact that there&apos;s zero evidence of any White House involvement in the IRS flagging Tea Party groups,
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>The other IRS target: the press</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.cjr.org/the_audit/those_other_irs_targets_the_pr.php" />
    <id>tag:www.cjr.org,2013://14.37602</id>

    <published>2013-05-16T10:50:00Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-16T14:31:00Z</updated>

    <summary>The nonprofit news experience undermines the Tea Party targeting outrage </summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ryan Chittum</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Earth Journalism" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="The Audit" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <category term="futureofnews" label="future of news" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="internalrevenueservice" label="Internal Revenue Service" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="irs" label="IRS" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="nonprofitnews" label="nonprofit news" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="teaparty" label="Tea Party" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.cjr.org/">
        <![CDATA[Conservatives are howling about the IRS targeting Tea Party groups applying for nonprofit tax exemptions. Well, welcome to our world. Nonprofit journalism has been going through the same thing for the last few years, with almost none of the screeching&mdash;even though journalism organizations had a much better case for tax exemptions than did the Tea Party groups. Tell me if]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Audit Notes: Student loan profits, paywall incentives, postal banking</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.cjr.org/the_audit/audit_notes_student_loan_profi.php" />
    <id>tag:www.cjr.org,2013://14.37590</id>

    <published>2013-05-15T10:50:00Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-15T06:23:37Z</updated>

    <summary>The Huffington Post on a government bonanza</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ryan Chittum</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Economic Crisis" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="The Audit" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <category term="futureofnews" label="future of news" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="pacificstandard" label="Pacific Standard" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="paywalls" label="paywalls" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="postoffice" label="post office" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="studentloans" label="student loans" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.cjr.org/">
        The Huffington Post&apos;s Shahien Nasiripour comes up with a great angle on news that the Education Department expects to make $51 billion in profit this year off student loans: Exxon Mobil Corp., the nation&apos;s most profitable company, reported $44.9 billion in net income last year. Apple Inc. recorded a $41.7 billion profit in its 2012 fiscal year, which ended in
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>The Bloomberg terminal scandal</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.cjr.org/the_audit/thinking_about_the_bloomberg_t.php" />
    <id>tag:www.cjr.org,2013://14.37569</id>

    <published>2013-05-14T10:50:00Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-15T18:59:01Z</updated>

    <summary>Not nearly in the Murdoch hacking league, but it requires a cultural shift</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ryan Chittum</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Economic Crisis" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="The Audit" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <category term="bloombergsnooping" label="Bloomberg snooping" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="ethics" label="ethics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="murdochhackingscandal" label="Murdoch hacking scandal" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="privacy" label="privacy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="terminalscandal" label="terminal scandal" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.cjr.org/">
        The Bloomberg terminal-snooping story is a serious ethics problem, but I&apos;ve read some awfully hysterical takes on it in the past couple of days. It&apos;s time to get some perspective on what we know happened and just how wrong it was. Adam Penenberg of Pando Daily wrote a head-scratcher headlined, &quot;How is Bloomberg&apos;s snooping different from News Corp.&apos;s phone hacks?&quot;
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Audit Notes: Bloomberg apologizes, Snow Fall re-imagined, Carr on Advance</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.cjr.org/the_audit/audit_notes_bloomberg_apologiz.php" />
    <id>tag:www.cjr.org,2013://14.37553</id>

    <published>2013-05-13T10:50:00Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-13T07:41:44Z</updated>

    <summary>Winkler admits reporters should never have had access to customer data</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ryan Chittum</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Economic Crisis" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="The Audit" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <category term="advancepublications" label="Advance Publications" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="bloombergnews" label="Bloomberg News" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="mattwinkler" label="Matt Winkler" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="snowfall" label="Snow Fall" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="timespicayune" label="Times-Picayune" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.cjr.org/">
        Bloomberg News has gotten a big black eye for snooping on its customers, and Editor-In-Chief Matt Winkler apologizes in a column headlined &quot;Holding Ourselves Accountable.&quot; We are defined by our words -- and they applied to us when a Bloomberg LP customer expressed concern that Bloomberg News reporters had access to limited client information. Our client is right. Our reporters
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Audit Notes: Bloomberg snoops, Alan Abelson, Niall in denial</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.cjr.org/the_audit/audit_notes_bloomberg_snoops_a.php" />
    <id>tag:www.cjr.org,2013://14.37540</id>

    <published>2013-05-10T10:50:00Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-10T04:56:10Z</updated>

    <summary>And the New York Post scoops</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ryan Chittum</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Economic Crisis" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="The Audit" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <category term="alanabelson" label="Alan Abelson" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="barrons" label="Barron&apos;s" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="bloomberg" label="Bloomberg" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="newyorkpost" label="New York Post" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="niallferguson" label="Niall Ferguson" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.cjr.org/">
        The New York Post reports that Goldman Sachs complained to Bloomberg that its reporters were spying on it via the company&apos;s famous terminal: In one instance, a Bloomberg reporter asked a Goldman executive if a partner at the bank had recently left the firm -- noting casually that he hadn&apos;t logged into his Bloomberg terminal in some time, sources added.
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>The WSJ editorial page hits rock bottom</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.cjr.org/the_audit/the_wsj_editorial_page_hits2.php" />
    <id>tag:www.cjr.org,2013://14.37533</id>

    <published>2013-05-09T17:14:47Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-09T18:52:55Z</updated>

    <summary>And that&apos;s saying something</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ryan Chittum</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="The Audit" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="The Observatory" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <category term="carbondioxide" label="carbon dioxide" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="climatechange" label="climate change" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="denialism" label="denialism" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="wsjeditorialpage" label="WSJ editorial page" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.cjr.org/">
        I&apos;m still trying to reattach my jaw after reading this op-ed published by The Wall Street Journal today. It&apos;s shameful even by the dismal standards of that page. In Defense of Carbon Dioxide The demonized chemical compound is a boon to plant life and has little correlation with global temperature. Breaking! Plants like CO2. The numbskullery on display here was
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Audit Notes: Farm labor fight, government debt, dumb-question headlines</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.cjr.org/the_audit/audit_notes_farm_labor_fight_g.php" />
    <id>tag:www.cjr.org,2013://14.37521</id>

    <published>2013-05-09T10:50:00Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-09T06:35:54Z</updated>

    <summary>Americans sue to get farm jobs from Mexican guest workers</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ryan Chittum</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Economic Crisis" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="The Audit" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <category term="deficit" label="deficit" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="guestworkers" label="guest workers" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="headlines" label="headlines" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="immigration" label="immigration" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="mexico" label="Mexico" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.cjr.org/">
        The New York Times is good to go page one with a story on a fascinating lawsuit in Georgia that alleges racial discrimination... in favor of Mexican guest workers. But as Congress weighs immigration legislation expected to expand the guest worker program, another group is increasingly crying foul -- Americans, mostly black, who live near the farms and say they
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>The Advocate raids the Picayune</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.cjr.org/the_audit/the_advocate_raids_the_picayun.php" />
    <id>tag:www.cjr.org,2013://14.37513</id>

    <published>2013-05-08T20:36:53Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-08T20:41:23Z</updated>

    <summary>Major defections from the New Orleans paper intensify a newspaper war</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ryan Chittum</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="The Audit" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <category term="advancepublications" label="Advance Publications" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="neworleans" label="New Orleans" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="newspaperwar" label="newspaper war" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="theadvocate" label="The Advocate" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="timespicayune" label="Times-Picayune" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.cjr.org/">
        <![CDATA[I wrote this last week about the South Louisiana newspaper war: "It will also not have a hard time poaching talent from the Picayune and its layoff pool." "It," being The Advocate, the Baton Rouge-based daily that is walking through the door opened by the Times-Picayune's retreat in its own hometown. The exodus has already begun&mdash;in a big way. The]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Business Insider goes native</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.cjr.org/the_audit/business_insider_goes_native.php" />
    <id>tag:www.cjr.org,2013://14.36906</id>

    <published>2013-05-07T10:50:00Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-07T14:35:43Z</updated>

    <summary>All but erasing the line between editorial and marketing</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ryan Chittum</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Economic Crisis" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="The Audit" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <category term="businessinsider" label="Business Insider" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="churchandstate" label="church and state" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="futureofnews" label="future of news" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="nativeads" label="native ads" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="sponsoredcontent" label="sponsored content" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.cjr.org/">
        Here&apos;s a Business Insider vertical called the &quot;Future of Business.&quot; Let&apos;s hope it&apos;s not the future of news. The problems start with the banner across the top of the page: If &quot;Within every industry, transformational change is coming. Embrace it&quot; reads like vacuous ad copy, well, the BI section is sponsored by SAP, and the actual blog posts aren&apos;t much
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>The corrupt City culture behind the Libor scandal</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.cjr.org/the_audit/the_corrupt_city_culture_that.php" />
    <id>tag:www.cjr.org,2013://14.36884</id>

    <published>2013-05-03T10:50:00Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-06T05:15:05Z</updated>

    <summary>The Wall Street Journal&apos;s excellent investigation digs up the dirt</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ryan Chittum</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Economic Crisis" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="The Audit" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <category term="bribery" label="bribery" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="conspiracy" label="conspiracy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="investigations" label="investigations" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="libor" label="Libor" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="thewallstreetjournal" label="The Wall Street Journal" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.cjr.org/">
        In the real word, big conspiracies are hard to maintain. People talk. Disagreements develop. Word tends to get out. But sometimes widespread conspiracies really do develop and go on for years. How do those get started and how do they go undetected for so long? Take a look at the mind-bogglingly enormous Libor scandal. How did as many as 16
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>The systemic plight of labor</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.cjr.org/the_audit/the_systemic_plight_of_labor.php" />
    <id>tag:www.cjr.org,2013://14.36866</id>

    <published>2013-05-02T15:59:47Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-02T17:08:42Z</updated>

    <summary>A revealing Thomas Friedman column on 401(k)s</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Felix Salmon</name>
        <uri>http://www.cjr.org</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Economic Crisis" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="The Audit" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <category term="401k" label="401k" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="labor" label="labor" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="personalfinance" label="personal finance" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="thomasfriedman" label="Thomas Friedman" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="wages" label="wages" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.cjr.org/">
         It&apos;s May Day, and Henry Blodget is celebrating -- if that&apos;s the right word -- with three charts, of which the most germane is the one above. It shows total US wages as a proportion of total US GDP -- a number which continues to hit all-time lows. Blodget also puts up the converse chart -- corporate profits as
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Covering somebody who&apos;s suing you</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.cjr.org/the_audit/covering_somebody_whos_suing_y.php" />
    <id>tag:www.cjr.org,2013://14.36865</id>

    <published>2013-05-02T15:22:37Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-02T15:22:48Z</updated>

    <summary>The WSJ sticks it to Sheldon Adelson by keeping a reporter on the beat</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ryan Chittum</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="The Audit" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <category term="frivolouslawsuits" label="frivolous lawsuits" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="kateokeeffe" label="Kate O&apos;Keeffe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="libel" label="libel" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="sheldonadelson" label="Sheldon Adelson" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="thewallstreetjournal" label="The Wall Street Journal" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.cjr.org/">
        Francine McKenna asked a good question on Twitter the other day about Wall Street Journal coverage of Sheldon Adelson&apos;s Las Vegas Sands: Is it okay for the reporter Kate O&apos;Keeffe to cover Adelson while he&apos;s suing her for libel? The short answer is yes, and it&apos;s worth unpacking why. Back in December, the Journal published a story about a lawsuit
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Those immobile newspaper companies</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.cjr.org/the_audit/those_immobile_newspaper_compa.php" />
    <id>tag:www.cjr.org,2013://14.36848</id>

    <published>2013-05-02T15:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-02T15:04:42Z</updated>

    <summary>Only 22 percent of a big sample even offer mobile products</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Dean Starkman</name>
        <uri>http://www.cjr.org</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="The Audit" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.cjr.org/">
        One of the truisms of digital journalism, and one that happens to be true, is that mobile is a big part of the future of news, if it isn&apos;t the future. The latest Pew &quot;State of the Media&quot; report goes on at length about the migration of news to mobile in a section titled, aptly, &quot;Digital: As Mobile Grows Rapidly,
    </content>
</entry>

</feed>