“The idea behind it is that certain kinds of work can be done well by applying ‘idle time’ in discrete chunks to a problem,” McGuire said. “While Bite-Size Edits is not meant to replace a professional proofreader or copy editor, a text can still be significantly improved. What’s more, we’ll be building in social features which add to the—yes!—fun of proofreading, and connect writers with readers, and editors.”
I asked him if he thinks this model could potentially work in journalism.
“In a professional context, I think it’s a great tool for proofing your own work quickly and easily,” he said. “And it is a good tool for a small, trusted group to edit a longer document. But I think in both cases you’d probably want a final look at the whole document after Bite-Size was done, before sending it out.”
He said that he doesn’t see their system as a way to “replace a good contextual edit, or a good professional proofread, for that matter.” Rather, it’s “one tool in the editing process.”
Like gooseGrade, Bite-Size Edits has received angel funding.
Artificial Proofreader
As much as I warn people about the failings of spellcheckers, the reality is that newsrooms—average users, for that matter—would benefit from better spellcheck software. This is something Dimitri Asonov, a Moscow-based computer scientist, agrees with wholeheartedly.
Asonov began to research computerized spellcheckers after he noticed an alarming number of typos in books and newspapers.
“If you open up a pricey book or upscale magazine or newspaper, it’s strange to see typos,” he told me. “How is it possible that people still tolerate [typos] in upscale products? I was thinking about it quite a lot, and then I started asking people who work in publishing and they told me it is very costly to get rid of all the typos. I was thinking that something has to be done—we are living in the twenty-first century and getting rid of typos shouldn’t be costly.”
He began evaluating published research about computerized spellchecking. As it turns out, there’s been quite a lot of it. He found close to fifty research papers on the topic, going back roughly forty years. And yet the spellcheckers we use every day still manage to miss—and cause—so many typos.
Asonov, who has a Ph.D from Humboldt University in Berlin, previously worked for IBM’s Almaden Research Center in California, as well as a domestic Russian airline. At first, his interest in spellcheckers was just a hobby. Now it’s more than that. He’s developed what he believes is a superior error-detection technology, and he wants people to test it out.
“I developed a technology that helps detect real-word errors which are especially hard to catch for both computer spellcheckers and human proofreaders,” he said. “Based on the experiments, this technology outperforms Microsoft Word significantly both in quality of proofreading and in speed.”
Asonov created a very basic Web site where people can upload a text file and check it using his technology. He’s been testing and improving the system by plugging in RSS feeds from major publications.
“What I’m trying to do now is to gather feedback from people who work in the field,” he said. “I contacted several publishing houses in Moscow and they are figuring out how they can use it in the publishing process. “
Asonov is aware of the loss of copy editors and proofreaders, and hopes his technology can play a role in helping maintain quality standards.
“I hope it can improve or keep quality the same, even though copy editors are being forced [out of jobs] every day, and quality is going down very quickly,” he said. “I’ve had some hard times convincing newspapers to use it. But I explain that that’s [because] they are less sensitive to typos than book publishers are. In newspapers, the first criteria is who is first, not who is typo free.”
No need to check that last statement.
Correction of the Week

Thanks for the link Craig. We are using GooseGrade to keep my rampant typos in check; and I use creative punctuation that drives a reader or two of mine around the bend. Only so much my own proof reading can do. And, as you - more than most- are aware, errors are easy to make. They have amazing customer service as well - we had a technical issue with the install over Christmas and they were great at pushing some fixes for it. Love you work Craig, thanks for reading (and hopefully not correcting). Ian.
#1 Posted by Ian Capstick, CJR on Fri 22 Jan 2010 at 07:02 PM
Hey Craig, thanks for the write-up - I'm curious about Bite-Size Edits applicability in professional newsrooms. Any initial thoughts?
#2 Posted by Hugh McGuire, CJR on Mon 25 Jan 2010 at 11:11 AM
Craig, another very good program is PerfectIt. For a one time cost of $90, PerfectIt is downloaded directly to Word. When you're done with an article, you simply click the button and it spits out a report with suggested corrections. As a copywriter and editor, I find this program invaluable.
I appreciate you listing these other programs as well. I will be blogging about this very thing in February at www.TheConfidentCopywriter.com. I'll be happy to highlight your article as the original source of information.
Thanks!
#3 Posted by Victoria Ipri, CJR on Mon 25 Jan 2010 at 06:16 PM
Craig: I'd never heard of any of these. Thanks for the run down, and thanks to the friend at FreelanceSuccess.com who linked to this post so the rest of us were aware of it. As a writer who blogs, I often think I've thoroughly proofread a post only to realize after I've hit the "Publish" button and looked at it again minutes or hours later I missed a typo or two or three - not good for my street cred or ego. I'll definitely consider using one of these in my writing practice, and will suggest that writers I'm working with on a new website do likewise.
Michelle Rafter
WordCount: Freelancing in the Digital Age.
#4 Posted by Michelle Rafter, CJR on Mon 25 Jan 2010 at 08:31 PM
This simple process had me sitting on the edge of my seat, as [ = fowler frowns on this use since it's initially unclear whether "as" is a relative adverb, relative pronoun or conjunction] I was previously unaware anyone had built an application to help readers suggest corrections.
here are three quick profiles of error-prevention or correction technologies or services every journalist should keep on their [ = plural pronoun for singular antecedent] radar.
It turns out [ = "it" is meaningless and serves no purpose (unlike an expletive, which serves through balance inversion to ensure that a subject doesn't overshadow its predicate)] the company behind the corrections widget and underlying service, gooseGrade, was profiled by TechCrunch earlier this year.
Simply put, they [ = plural pronoun for the singular "company"] have created a way for Web sites to crowdsource [??] edits and corrections.
Web site owners can install the gooseGrade widget in order to have an easy, streamlined method for readers to submit proposed [ = "submit proposed" seems redundant] edits or corrections.
It simplifies the corrections process, which [ = a relative pronoun requires an antecedent noun; a demonstrative pronoun would've been better, = "and that"] is a very good thing.
Right now, anyone can add the widget to their [ = plural pronoun for singular antecedent] blog or Web site, and people can also sign up individually to suggest edits and corrections, which [ = a relative pronoun requires an antecedent noun; an absolute construction would've been better, = "a process made easier"] is made easier by the company’s bookmarklet [??].
Rather than pursuing [ = "pursue" since "than" is a relative adverb, equivalent to "it aims to help to a degree exceeding the degree to which it aims to pursue"] a public form of collaborative post-publication editing, this project aims to help writers get...
Your [ = shift to second person from third person] fellow participants can then edit small sections of text.
I asked him if [ = whether] he thinks this model could potentially work in journalism.
And yet the spellcheckers we [ = shift to first person] use every day still manage to miss—and cause—so many typos.
Asonov, who has a Ph.D [ = no closing period in ph.d.]
#5 Posted by anonymous, CJR on Mon 25 Jan 2010 at 10:08 PM
Hello. It looks like some of your organizational needs could be taken care of by looking in our direction for quicker solutions. Are you embarking on cost reduction while accommodating excessive work from your customers, without compromising your quality of work? Instead of sending your customers away to your competitors when your staffing is not adequate for your work volume, RDS is your answer to maintaining your customers. Our pricing is structured to allow your company to continue making profits from work that is outsourced to us. We are always looking for ways to help you increase your profits without compromising quality.. For more information, visit our website at http://www.risingdatasolutions.com
#6 Posted by Antonio Sulit Jr., CJR on Wed 24 Mar 2010 at 01:32 PM
Hello. It looks like some of your organizational needs could be taken care of by looking in our direction for quicker solutions. Are you embarking on cost reduction while accommodating excessive work from your customers, without compromising your quality of work? Instead of sending your customers away to your competitors when your staffing is not adequate for your work volume, RDS is your answer to maintaining your customers. Our pricing is structured to allow your company to continue making profits from work that is outsourced to us. We are always looking for ways to help you increase your profits without compromising quality.. For more information, visit our website at http://www.risingdatasolutions.com
#7 Posted by Antonio Sulit Jr., CJR on Thu 22 Apr 2010 at 01:03 PM