After Monday’s news that the McClatchy Company would be cutting 1400 jobs at its newspapers across the country, the affected papers were left in the unpleasant position of having to cover their own dismemberment. I looked at a representative sampling of the newspapers in order to get a sense of what was—and what wasn’t—initially reported.
Although The Sacramento Bee, McClatchy’s hometown paper, will lose 86 jobs, reporter Dale Kasler focused on the company-wide job reductions (“McClatchy cuts jobs 10 percent, lays off employees at Bee, other papers”), devoting comparatively few paragraphs of the A1 story to in-house affairs. Kasler, who has been on the McClatchy beat for almost ten years, absolutely killed the story, talking to McClatchy CEO Gary Pruitt, Bee publisher Cheryl Dell, and numerous outside sources in a comprehensive article that really examined the financial problems besetting both McClatchy and the wider industry.
The Miami Herald, “hammered” by the most extensive layoffs of any newspaper in the chain (“Miami Herald to reduce its staff by 250”), led with the in-house carnage, not getting to McClatchy until the fourth paragraph of the 997-word story. The Herald’s John Dorschner was the only other reporter to go directly to Gary Pruitt for a quote instead of relying on Pruitt’s general press release. (“I’m an old fart, I believe in direct quotes,” Dorschner told me.) Pruitt was extremely blunt in person: “The Miami Herald’s performance has been worse than most, if not all, of the newspapers .” Dorschner’s dispassionate piece ended ominously, with Pruitt refusing to call this the nadir of the recent newspaper decline.
The Kansas City Star, facing 120 job cuts, led with news of the company-wide layoffs (McClatchy to cut 1,400 jobs nationwide, 120 at The Star), and devoted only one paragraph to the cuts at The Star. Reporter David Hayes, who declined comment, gave the story a vaguely positive spin, emphasizing the money that McClatchy will save by this “restructuring plan,” and quoting CEO Pruitt, in a press release, as calling the move “a continuing, strategic vision for successful future operations.” The article ended by noting that McClatchy shares dropped 1.8 percent on the news.
The story only merited 189 words at The Wichita Eagle, which will cut twelve jobs (“Eagle to cut 3 percent of workforce”). They’re 189 blunt words, though: The article noted that McClatchy “continues to struggle to attract advertising dollars,” quoted Pruitt’s press release on the national economic downturn, and finished by citing McClatchy’s 15 percent ad revenue loss in the first quarter of 2008.
The Belleville News-Democrat, also facing the loss of twelve positions, albeit not from its newsroom staff, led its 626-word story with news of the in-house cuts (“News-Democrat to cut 12 positions as part of corporate restructuring”). The unbylined story is well-reported, citing publisher Jay Tebbe in the first paragraph, mentioning McClatchy’s historical reluctance to lay off employees, and going to an independent newspaper consultant for his take on the cuts (“McClatchy is still viewed as a newspaper company that cares about quality,” he said).
Despite recent increases in reader satisfaction, the Fort Worth Star-Telegram will lose 120 employees, and its coverage (“Star-Telegram begins work force reduction”) centered on that “painful but necessary step.” The unbylined article, heavily reliant on quotes from publisher Gary Wortel, went out of its way to reassure readers that they can expect to remain satisfied: Although subscription prices are increasing, they’re “still nearly $2 less than the average cost of a subscription in other Texas markets.” The story ended by quoting Wortel’s confidence in the Star-Telegram’s ‘“ability to navigate to a stable and prosperous future as an integrated media company serving as our community’s most trusted supplier of news and advertising information.’”