For most of this autumn he was a permanent fixture at Dewey Square, reporting, blogging, Tweeting, and knocking heads with quarrelous protesters. His diligence has made him one of the few reporters who, rather than idealize or scapegoat the Occupy movement, has seen for what it is—a disparate group of generally well-meaning individuals who are alternately and at once inspiring, obtuse, galvanic, and ridiculous.
“They’re a difficult group to write about,” says Faraone. “They’re so hypersensitive. They hate criticism. I learned early with them to make sure that everything I write is solid. Did I talk to ten people about this one sentence to make sure it’s right?” A tour of the now-cleared park reveals some of the oases that helped ease his long days—like Biddy Early’s, a nearby Irish bar which became a second home for many of the tent city stalwarts: “Reporters on one side, occupiers on the other, undercover cops in the middle.” The men’s room at South Station proved just as useful for surviving long reporting stints: “At hour fourteen or fifteen, there’s just a row of people at the sinks, splashing water on their faces. It really does help.”
In February, he will self-publish a book called 99 Nights with the 99 Percent, which will compile his months of reporting into a ground-level overview of the Occupy phenomenon, punctuated by stylized features, like a haiku timeline of the ninety-nine nights (“Zuccotti renamed / Now it’s called Liberty Square / Their park now bitches”). The book will draw on the sights he’s seen while traveling the country visiting various camps: a massive, tense march through Seattle, in weather that, he wrote, “couldn’t be more cliché if it was raining lattes”; a weekend at Occupy Oakland (“just one big angry peaceful mob”); an entire block of foreclosed houses in Chicago. “I went to Chicago because instead of guessing what Occupy Boston’s going to end up being like, there’s this movement in Chicago that’s been nomadic and struggling the whole time,” he says.
Now, of course, Dewey Square has cleared, Occupy Boston has dispersed, and the movement is revising its tactics. In a recent story, Faraone described how Occupy is transmuting into something less frenetic and, perhaps, more sustainable. That’s fine with him, as the last few months have taken their toll. “My life is so much anxiety,” he says. “I’ve lost a lot of weight. My pants are falling off.”
Still, he has no plans to abandon the story. “They’re harder to cover now, but I’m as tapped in as I can possibly be without being so deep that journalistic ethics become a problem,” he wrote in a recent e-mail. “I’ll be on the case all year.” It is as if, having grasped hold of the biggest story of his career, he is reluctant to relax his grip, lest it get away. “I have no idea where I’d be without this. I have no idea what I’d be writing,” he says. “Something like Occupy comes along, and it’s like everything comes together at the right time.”

The question I would most like to see asked by those covering these Occupy Hissy Fits is "What exactly has the 1% done to you to keep you from fulfilling your dreams?" No platitudes. No generalizations about the filthy Jew bastard cabal that keeps the Fed and Wall Street in line with the Protocols...
I would like some "professional journalist" somewhere to come up with some man-on-the-street substantiation of these supposedly commonplace Occupy tales of woe and oppression. What exactly has stopped anyone in this country from getting off of his or her ass and accomplishing anything? What precisely is stopping anyone from Occupying the cashier's position at the Starbucks? Or the driver's seat of the asphalt machine? Or writing a novel? Or painting houses? Raking leaves? Babysitting kids? Etc?
Of course, this kind of honest inquiry will never happen, given the "weed smelling", alt-weekly-type "professional journalists" presently charged with covering the embers of the Occupy "movement" - because doing so would instantly expose the pervasive laziness and greed that are in fact that only unifying characteristics of this purported "movement".
#1 Posted by padikiller, CJR on Tue 3 Jan 2012 at 07:28 AM
As the Editor of the Dig, I love Chris Faraone, but I take issue with your characterization that we have no heart. It's beating alive and well. In fact, some of our coverage of Occupy Boston (chiefly Lauren Metter) was picked up by the Guardian UK, Washington Post and Huffington Post. you can find all of it here:
http://digboston.com/think/2011/10/occupy-boston/
*THUMP THUMP*
#2 Posted by David Day, CJR on Tue 3 Jan 2012 at 01:57 PM
@David Day: For the record, I think the Dig still does a lot of solid work, and it deserves credit for being a truly independent newspaper in a world of alt-weekly chains.
#3 Posted by Justin Peters, CJR on Tue 3 Jan 2012 at 11:30 PM
Hey PadKiller - Great question: "What exactly has the 1% done to you to keep you from fulfilling your dreams?"
Here are some things that, we the wealthy elite did -
Let me start with a group of people called the Native Americans. You may have learned something about them in second grade. We took their food, land and killed them.
African Americans - We ensalved them for years and used their labor to build profits. When they tried to complain, we hung them in our backyards. We took their body parts and used them to brag to our friends about how proud we were that we killed a whiny liberal. We never paid them back for all that labor, which has left them more than a bit broke.
Women - For decades we told them that they were nothing but a bunch of pieces of plastic, designed and produced only to serve men in a domestic household manner. We denied them of the right to own their own property, the right to vote, and the right to get a job so that we could hold them down.
Children - we allowed American companies to open up sweat shops in foriegn countries so that we could pay children pennies to work endless hours. Never mind all the babies we blew up in all the wars we made so much profit off of. Needless to say, its tough to get ahead when your getting bombed at. By the way, take some time researching how much money some of your favorite American brands made off creating computers, financial tools, tanks, and all kinds of other objects during World War II. That will give you an education in the downsides of American business practices, that you may have missed in your crapola MBA program. That leads me to point 5 -
Students - We screwed them too! We turned unviersities into major corporations. So now, departments have to compete for resources and cash. To be honest, it is tough to raise money when you are the history department. So we give our kids a subpar education, meanwhile we make so much money off of continually re-investing our massive endownments that we don't even need students to make profits. Nonetheless, we ask students to take out 150-200K in student loans to pay for their degrees. We get them when they are young. At age 19, we use great advertizing schemes to lure them into loans they will never be able to pay back. We make millions! Its so clever.
Homeowners - We sold mortages to Americans who were our clients. We broke our fudiciary duty to these clients. We knew they couldn't afford the loans, but we told them that they could. We also told them that they really needed a big big house. Then as the mortages went belly up - we bet all our chips against them. Yay! Profits soared for us. No big deal tons of people lost their homes. Its kind of tough to get ahead without a roof over your head, especially when you have kids to feed, but hey we made money so I bet they too can make some money if they are willing to screw people hard enough.
I haven't even begun to go into what we have done over the years to soo many other people in this country and abroad. Not everyone in the 1% is sociopathic asshole. Many of them are, however. Occupy use the 99% compared to the 1% to point to a system of laws and a financial structure that has been carefully crafted for years to keep the wealthy very wealthy and the poor very poor. This country has been this way for a long time. The poor have also made their own greedy mistakes. We are all human. We are all inherintly greedy and selfish. Here's the difference between people who support Occupy and those who don't - the former want to come together as a people to create a more just system. The later are either still stuck in their own brain wash that good old corporate america will save the day or they are simply - one of the sociopaths.
When you wake up from your coma of ignorance take some time to thank Chris Faraone, the Weekly Dig and The CJR for their commitment to social justice. Wi
#4 Posted by Lisa Bolduc, CJR on Thu 1 Mar 2012 at 03:57 AM