For a quarterly coupon magazine—even “Southern California’s best coupon, calendar & news magazine”—Reader Magazine would appear to have landed some major exclusives.
This summer, the magazine, which is distributed by mail to 150,000 households in San Bernadino county, caught up with the Dalai Lama.
And in 2008, it asked questions of Thomas L. Friedman, John McCain, and Stephen Colbert.
From the February/March/April 2008 “Reader Magazine interview of Senator, John McCain, 2008 Presidential candidate” (Reader does not make it easy to link directly to their articles, but back issues are available in PDF format on their website):
Reader Magazine: As you look at yourself, was your courage there before you were taken prisoner or did it develop?
McCain: I think it developed in this respect. I had believed that all glory was self glory and that I didn’t need anybody else and I could do everything on my own and I was brave and tough and I was just like Robert Jordan, my hero, the protagonist in “For Whom the Bell Tolls.”
The thing is, Reader’s interview is an awfully lot like—almost word for word, in fact—an interview CNN’s Larry King did with John McCain in 2005.
KING: As you look at yourself was your character there before you were taken prisoner or did it develop there?
MCCAIN: I think it developed in this respect and I believe that all glory was self glory and that I didn’t need anybody else and I could do everything on my own and I was brave and tough and I was just like Robert Jordan, my hero, the protagonist in “For Whom the Bell Tolls.”
Similarly, Reader’s interview with the Dalai Lama, published earlier this year, was originally published in 2006, in The Progressive. Thomas L. Friedman’s interview (November/December/January 2008-09) was taken from Time. And the exchange in which Reader “sat with” Stephen Colbert (May/June/July 2008) appears to be a combined work of fiction and bits from the comedian’s appearance at Harvard and his bio on the Australian Broadcasting Corporation website.
RM: Your background is in entertainment.
SC: And my foreground. What is The Reader anyway? Who has time to read today?
Indeed. What is the Reader anyway? Though Reader founder Chris Theodore says his magazine is ten years old, only issues from 2008 on are available on its website. From a search of the magazine’s back issues, Reader appears to be a usually 32-page publication of advertisements—tailored to four neighborhoods in San Bernardino County—and content it seems to take from almost anywhere and then claims as its own.
In each of the above cases, Reader represented the interview as its work; Reader Magazine is substituted for the name of the original interviewer in all but the Q&A with the Dalai Lama, in which Amitabh Pal is given a byline, but neither The Progressive nor the original 2006 publication date is mentioned. In some cases, the interviews were shortened or lightly edited. Good thing, too, since the material was lifted from publications that were several years out-of-date; in Pal’s interview, Reader omitted a reference to the Iraq War and changed the Dalai Lama’s age from 70 to 76, for example.
“This is definitely unethical, and, at some level, troubling. Unfortunately, in this day and age, it is fairly common, certainly online but also in print,” said Pal when I informed him of his work’s second run. “The practices by the Reader are, sadly, part of a broader trend.”
Perhaps. Plagiarism certainly happens today. The digital age has brought new ease for writers to cut and copy, as well as a vaster universe for them to cut and copy from. These developments have coincided with an era charged with the spirit of aggregation and the collaborative wiki-, while also squeezed by time and budgets and the constant call to do more with less. None of this excuses plagiarism, but helps to explain why it continues.

Interesting, article, but I would expect a writer for CJR to know the proper use of its and it's:
"It’s design and layout are crummy and crowded..."
Disappointing. I see it all too often these days among journalists.
#1 Posted by Sally Bahner, CJR on Fri 28 Oct 2011 at 11:18 PM
The magazine should be the one RECEIVING the court notice to desist copying in part or in whole any one of the articles listed in your piece. If the publisher of the magazine isn't stopped now, he /she will become bolder and the authors listed or not listed in the articles will have even a more difficult time making them stop or getting them not to print it whole rather than even taking the time to leave out information or the author's name. Even then the court could have difficulty believing the author's dismay or stopping them simply because of the cuts in personnel on their end and lightness of the damage at this point. Also, it was allowed before, so why the fuss now???
Plagiarism on the computer is not new and is something high school kids try to do with teachers by one writing a report and then the author allows others to change their names and heading at the top and all--2 or more make copies and turn them in. I gave F's to all the papers alike since I found both the author that allowed it and the peers that copied guilty. One complained--"Ms So-and-So" didn't grade this way. and my only response was, I'm not her and besides the classes were all warned in advance not to copy. I still had to stay alert.
If high school kids think they can get away with plagiarism with both resource material and each others', they will do it later for college or work and be blacklisted. There is no excuse for the publisher in your article to be unaware of the illegality of what he did. If he were innocent, why did he not take part in a phone interview or response to e-mails sent him? He knew!!!
#2 Posted by trishjw, CJR on Sat 29 Oct 2011 at 12:40 PM
YAWN.
Some guy mooches content and uses it in a direct mail flyer.
Big deal. This isn't really journalism - it's direct mail advertising.
95% of these papers end up in trash bags or bird cages.
Plagiarism? Certainly. But what's the import to journalism?
#3 Posted by padikiller, CJR on Sun 30 Oct 2011 at 11:47 AM
well the publication does share ideas that many people may never come across otherwise because of the fact that it is mailed to people for free. I'd like to read about an expose on Time and how they check their facts or create them to suit the story, case in point:
http://www.vanguardblog.com/2009.10.14/bad-facts-bad-story.html
oh wait should I not have shared this ?! --- we need free press and free speech and free internet
#4 Posted by Cheryl, CJR on Wed 2 Nov 2011 at 12:07 AM
Good story. Don't listen to padikiller - this matters. The prevalence of plagiarism needs to be shown in all of it's forms.
I think one important/unmentioned lesson that readers should take away from this is that we should be checking these smaller publications more frequently because they may feel they can fly under the radar.
I caught my editor at my university newspaper plagiarizing - as well as a few other editors/writers - and it doesn't seem like it's a big deal to the journalists there that I have told, which is disheartening - so I find it aggravating to see that same apathy here just because this is advertisement material.
The import to journalism is that journalists face theft from many people such as Chris Theodore, and so should be informed/aware. The many journalists this guy ripped off seemed to think it was important.
#5 Posted by Brian Jensen, CJR on Sun 25 Dec 2011 at 05:28 PM
From Reader's Magazine website:
"At The Reader Magazine, we hold ourselves to the highest standards of ethical conduct and personal integrity. Our values are our strength and they guide us in all we do."
There you have it, straight from the horse's mouth.
#6 Posted by Josh, CJR on Fri 16 Mar 2012 at 11:05 PM