A lot of people floated in and floated out; you had people from UC Berkeley and the kids from San Francisco State coming in and crunching numbers. It really was a collaborative effort from competing organizations, you know. There were different places where we met; we did some stuff out of the Center for Investigative Reporting for a while, we did some stuff out of the Tribune’s newsroom. So you’d have people like [retired journalist] Mary Fricker who would come down from Sebastopol and sleep in a cold garage. She was just insane, and would come down and work—many a night, I’d come to work and she’d be there, and I’d leave and she’d [still] be there. And then of course [independent journalist] Bob Butler and Thomas Peele, who is the investigative reporter for the Bay Area News Group, which is my company—we’ve had him on the story exclusively for eighteen months.
What significance do you see here for collaborative, investigative journalism?
A lot of people say, well, news organizations can’t do investigative journalism [anymore], but that wasn’t why we came together. It wasn’t because the Tribune or the Bay Area News Group couldn’t have done it. But I don’t think that it would have been anywhere close to what it was or made the statement that it did, because we also had Channel 2 KTVU, Channel 7 at one point, KQED, and KCBS have aired stories—so we had all these different mediums and entities who would link out. We had a big story for instance, that talked about the phone records that had been ignored and really pointed to a conspiracy, as well as this videotape [of Your Black Muslim Bakery leader Yusuf Bey IV describing the shooting in detail and bragging about being protected by his friendship with the lead detective on the case]. When we came out with that, that was a huge break—we had coordinated television with that as well, and we subjugated us coming out first thing in the morning with having the 10 o’clock news do a story at night and then saying “you can read about it in the Oakland Tribune and the Contra Costa Times,” which is a pretty big departure from what you would do in a normal competitive environment.
If we [as news organizations] are going to redefine ourselves going forward, investigative reporting is one of the things that have to be part of what we are and what we remain. So if that means developing these partnerships that before we wouldn’t have done because we would have just done it ourselves, I think it’s something we have to take into account and do.
How about going forward; what’s next?
Obviously, we’re going to continue to follow the trials, every hearing, every court appearance; we will be there. Whether it is a Chauncey Bailey Project story or just an Oakland Tribune staff story, we will certainly be covering this stuff gavel to gavel. And we want to see justice meted out. The outgrowth of this has been an effort to see that the institutions within the city of Oakland are held to a higher standard, the police department, city officials, and the like. For a long time there hasn’t been this level of probative newspaper coverage or media coverage of the goings on within the Oakland police department. We’re not trying to tear it down, we’re just trying to make it more of a functional organization, and that’s really the goal.
Another thing that has been nice about this has been that the California Endowment, which was one of the funders, has expressed a desire on some of its other projects to potentially put together a Bailey-esque kind of collaborative reporting project to report on some of the initiatives that the foundation is doing. So people are already using the Bailey Project sort of as an adjective, and that’s pretty cool.
What would you say you’ve learned in the course of doing this?