In his weekly “Stories I’d Like to See” column, journalist and entrepreneur Steven Brill spotlights topics that, in his opinion, have received insufficient media attention. This article was originally published on Reuters.com.
1. Hoop academics:
What’s one year of classes at the University of Kentucky really like for basketball stars?
Maybe I’ve been brainwashed by Taylor Branch’s fabulous NCAA article in the Atlantic last fall titled “The Shame of College Sports” and by Joe Nocera’s compelling Op-Ed columns in The New York Times arguing that the NCAA is all about money and nothing about education. And I admit I’m drafting this after watching the feel-good NCAA ads profiling the teams’ scholar-athletes during the March basketball tournament. But now that the Final Four have come and gone and we know that all five starters on the University of Kentucky’s winning team are quitting to join the NBA after just one or two years at school, I’m wondering what a reporter will find if he or she digs into the education these freshman and sophomores actually received.
What courses did they take? How rigorous were they? What do the players’ professors and fellow students have to say about their participation in class? Did the players do the work? Did they lag or excel?
How many hours did departing superstar freshman Anthony Davis actually spend in class in his first and only year at college? What papers did he write? What tests did he take? If he and others were serious students who got a real college education, however abbreviated, that would puncture a stereotype, and one definition of a good story is that it surprises people. If he or others on the team were completely divorced from anything approaching academics—perhaps by taking comically unacademic classes or rarely showing up, or both, or not going to class altogether once the season ended—that would add more indelible specifics to what Branch and Nocera have been writing about.
2. GSA: Beyond the Vegas boondoggle
I’ve been thinking about the hilarious, or maddening, story that broke last week about 300 employees from the federal General Services Administration spending more than $800,000 of taxpayer money on a “conference” at a plush resort near Las Vegas. The details, as disclosed by the GSA’s inspector general [PDF], included gourmet banquets, a $3,200 mind reader, $44-per-person breakfasts and $75,000 spent on a training exercise to build a bicycle. There was also a $136,000 tab for travel and meals just to conduct “dry run” planning sessions at the Nevada resort. The impact of all this was amplified by the inspector general giving a congressional committee a spoof video, recorded during the event, that was then released to the press
All great stuff, but I think the press may be missing the forest for the trees by not following up with more important questions.
Buried in the inspector general’s report is the simple statement that this biannual conference of GSA employees from four different GSA regions in the West had been going on for years. Its stated purpose, according to the inspector general, is to offer “training in job skills; an exchange of ideas between ‘higher-ups’ in the four regions; and a combination of those things.” Huh?
Anyone who goes to conferences like these knows that most are fun getaways whose only work-related purpose is usually for the participants to network their way into better jobs. So why, when our government is broke, do we pay for these “conferences”? Suppose the conference had only cost $200,000 or $300,000, which, when you tally up the inspector general’s list of overpayments, seems what the total should have been? Why would we routinely spend all that money, not to mention waste all that employee time?

Outside of Venezuela where the Castro regimes uses the "medical brigades" as barter for oil, Cuban "medical brigades" have always been about 1/2 medicine and 1/2 espionage activities and for the actual medical personnel defection has become such a problem that they have “minders” follow them everywhere they go.
#1 Posted by Mike H, CJR on Tue 10 Apr 2012 at 01:01 PM
Cuba has the same right to conduct covert operations in its own self-interest as the US has to declare an embargo on Cuba until such time as US-aligned business can steal Cuban wealth on the US' terms.
#2 Posted by Jonathan, CJR on Tue 10 Apr 2012 at 01:27 PM
@ Jonathan, it certianly is true that Cuba has the "right" to engage in covert activities, but lets not pretend that the activities of the "medical brigades" are anything other than spear's tip of Cuba's vast covert activity network.
#3 Posted by Mike H, CJR on Tue 10 Apr 2012 at 02:25 PM
The Cubans are coming! The Cubans are coming!
Run! They have stethoscopes!
When the terror that is Cuba goes from providing check ups and the occasional 'viva la revolutionaistas!' to providing torture training to police forces while funding right wing opposition parties and their presses while stealing classified documents and engineering coup d'etats while using international credit agencies to cripple second world governments so they become third world countries dependent on Cuban doctors for basic services, let me know.
Until then, I think I've got more to fear from covert Cuban tobacco than Dr. Che Socialist. When America starts spending their resources more like Cuba and less like America, then you can criticize away about their ulterior motives.
In the meantime, enjoy the checkup. There are worse approaches to 'covert activity'.
#4 Posted by Thimbles, CJR on Tue 10 Apr 2012 at 03:51 PM
to providing torture training to police forces
You mean like what the Cuban’s were doing to US POW’s in Vietnam (there are many more POW’s then just McCain who stated this … but they all must be lying, right)? Or like how the Cubans trained the Sandinistan secret police? With all fairness though, the Cubans did have a bit of help from the Stazi on that one. Birds of a feather I suppose.
while funding right wing opposition parties
You should read up on who was paying martyred left wing hero Orlando Letelier’s bills. And for that matter, Filiberto Ojeda Ríos.
and their presses
You mean like Manuel David Orrio? But in all fairness, most journalists really earn their Castro kneepads so the checks are really obligatory …..
while stealing classified documents
Sort of like what Anna Montez did for Havana when she worked at the DIA?
and engineering coup d'etats
Like what the Cubans tried to do in the Congo, Columbia (FARC#, Boliva, and Peru #MRTA)? Lemme guess … they did it all for the right reasons.
while using international credit agencies to cripple second world governments
You got me here … after all, seeing as how Castro and the rest of the regime has managed to stuff away hundreds of millions in European banks, I don’t think they would want to do anything to endanger that.
let me know.
Done! I am glad you caught me today Thimbles … cause you sure wont read about this in The Nation magazine.
You gotta give it to Castro though, he screwed the pooch when he had political rival General Arnaldo Ochoa executed in a televised show trial …without that execution we wouldn’t have had the dozens of Cuban intelligence agency personnel defect after they saw the ugly truth about the regime. Now if only their liberal counterparts in America and Europe could do likewise.
#5 Posted by Mike H, CJR on Tue 10 Apr 2012 at 05:18 PM
"Oooooo, look at all this stuff from a little Caribbean country that hasn't been relevant on the global security front since the USSR money stopped flowing in"
Sorry, are we still talking about the doctor exchange program or something else now?
#6 Posted by Thimbles, CJR on Tue 10 Apr 2012 at 06:30 PM
Ps, I know it's hard because of the two link limit but please attempt to cite your claims.. I hope the 40th request is the charm.
#7 Posted by Thimbles, CJR on Tue 10 Apr 2012 at 06:36 PM