Just the phrase “Commerce Department’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration” is enough to put most people to sleep. But read the story. It’s got money: this is a $13-billion program that ran off the rails and is likely to suffer huge cost overruns beyond that sum. It’s got scandal: that $13 billion has been wasted, according to one report, on a “dysfunctional program that had become a national embarrassment due to chronic management problems.” And it’s important: the lapse in satellite coverage will “threaten life and property” around the world, a review panel warned.
So, if I was running the Washington Post or the DC bureau of any major news organizations, I’d put a reporter on this project: Find the five most obscure but important government programs that are so screwed up and so important that a new Romney or Obama administration had better jump in and fix them immediately. The way to start is to read the reports of all the independent inspector generals who work in every government agency. That’s apparently what generated this Times story about how in three or four years we may have even more to worry about when another Hurricane Sandy looms offshore.
Question: why should a utility staff for an event which happens once every 5 years? The difference in manpower requirements is not negligible. To deal with a large storm, the kind associated with major disruptions that may last several days, a utility would need 10 times the number of personnel. Why should they maintain these staffing levels when crews from neighboring areas can be called in for surge capacity during events that happen so infrequently?
Stories I’d like to see: why does the Obama allow contributions from prepaid credit cards, overseas accounts and intentionally disables its CCV system? I won’t hold my breath for this one.
#1 Posted by Mike H, CJR on Tue 30 Oct 2012 at 12:52 PM
Something to keep an eye on:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/3-nuclear-power-reactors-shut-down-during-sandy/2012/10/30/7ddd3a94-22b6-11e2-8448-81b1ce7d6978_story.html
#2 Posted by Thimbles, CJR on Tue 30 Oct 2012 at 04:14 PM
Something to keep an eye on:
Agreed .. lets keep an eye on how completely trouble free and flawless all these units perform during an emergency shutdown situation and let that be a lesson to the screaming ninnines of the world.
#3 Posted by Mike H, CJR on Tue 30 Oct 2012 at 05:19 PM
"Agreed .."
Glad we can agree on keeping an eye on aging nuclear reactors with full spent fuel pools during a natural disaster.
It's so nice rational people can agree on something so freaking basic.
#4 Posted by Thimbles, CJR on Tue 30 Oct 2012 at 10:36 PM
I'd like to see something about the changes in local news reporting and how this affected storm information. As a daughter of NJ who has been watching from a few states away, I'm struck how little and how thin the resources for local news have been. The major NJ papers did the minimum, following the governor and reporting on weather and easy-to-access areas. The networks did the usual person buffeted by wind on the boardwalk. But my only resources to learn what was happening at a county and town level, consistently, were things like Patch and the incredible Facebook group New Jersey Hurricane News. These were lifelines but they were nothing like the work of actual news teams, and were uneven, rife with rumor, and prone to hysteria. We've changed the landscape of local news and these 'citizen journalism' efforts, for all their galleries of user photos, can't render a chaotic situation comprehensible in the way that trained reporters and experienced news organizations once could.
#5 Posted by Michelle Moon, CJR on Wed 31 Oct 2012 at 09:49 AM