After yesterday’s federal court hearing in which Illinois governor Rod Blagojevich and his chief of staff John Harris heard the charges brought against them, Blagojevich attorney Sheldon Sorosky said that his client “is very surprised and certainly feels that he did not do anything wrong.” The nonchalance of this statement, and the adjectives that Sorosky uses to describe Blago’s state of mind—“sad, surprised and innocent”—jar with the sense of moralistic outrage that characterizes today’s Chicago-area editorials and columns.
They are, unsurprisingly, strongly worded. The Southtown Star’s editorial leads the no-question-about-how-we-feel category with its title: “Our View: Get Out, Gov,” and brief explanation: “We’ve had enough. This nation is in a crisis…He must resign now.”
The Daily Herald’s editorial agrees in principle (“Governor should resign immediately”), but takes a more pragmatic tone: “It will be near impossible for him to have any effectiveness in the legislative process with these charges hanging over his head.”
And the Chicago Tribune’s editorial wins for eloquence: “Rod Blagojevich is, more than before, the governor who cannot govern.”
John Kass was the first opinion columnist featured this morning at the Tribune’s Web site, and he pulls his punches, writing, “This is not Camelot. This is Chicago. And a governor is on the grill.” Addressing the potential fallout for Obama, he adds that while “Illinois isn’t surprised…the national media must be shocked,” and warns that while many “see Obama as some pristine creature…unstained by our grubby politics,” the president-elect at some point “must address the stench in his home state.”
(Kass also offered up some context for the situation when he appeared yesterday on “Kathy and Judy,” a radio show on WGN, a Tribune-owned station. By turns amused and fuming, he praised U.S. attorney Patrick Fitzgerald: “Everything changed when U.S. Senator Peter Fitzgerald brought Patrick Fitzgerald here to be the United States attorney. And all of a sudden…it wasn’t Jim Thompson and his collective guys running the U.S. attorney’s office anymore. It was an outsider who didn’t want to run for governor, an outsider who didn’t care about being a member of a white shoes law firm with a corner office…you’ll never clean everything up, but it’s just astounding to see when people actually realize how filthy this state is.”)
The Tribune’s Mary Schmich uses her column to address that filthiness (“Yeah, well, bleep you, too.”), but ends it with a somber plea: “Even if these charges haven’t been proven, they’re so strong and the evidence is so compelling that this state and this city are weakened if you stay. Give up your job. Give Illinois back.”
The Chicago Sun-Times prominently features several of their columnists writing on the Blago affair. Mary Mitchell dashes off a rather one-tone column, basically asking, “How could anyone be that dumb?” But Neil Steinberg and Lynn Sweet hit the mark with vociferous opinions.
Sweet, the Sun-Times Washington bureau chief, mentions the egregiousness of Blagojevich’s actions, even within the lineage of the state’s history of corruption: “Usually in Illinois, politicians know how to walk right up to the pay-to-play line and not cross it. Based on this complaint, it looks like Blagojevich, a runner, leaped across the line in a variety of schemes to try to leverage the appointment.” And she adds what most surprises her, a reminder of how removed Blagojevich’s desires were from reality:
What’s hard to believe is that Blagojevich thought that Obama would appoint him to any slot in his administration. Blagojevich was under a cloud during Obama’s entire presidential campaign, and the Obama team kept him at a distance. The Illinois governor never stumped for Obama — they did not want him — and unlike other Democratic governors, he did not play any significant role in the campaign.