Chris Dunn, an attorney with New York Civil Liberties Union, says this pattern that is emerging at the protests, of making the NYPD-issued credential the only way to differentiate reporters from protesters, is problematic:
I’m aware there are circumstances in which the police will release from an arrest situation people that identify as reporters. Where the rub comes is when they are using the DCPI credential as the sole acceptable proof that you’re a reporter. The DCPI credential is hardly the only evidence that someone is a bona fide reporter.
This seems particularly true in cases like Farley, Lennard, and Gwynne’s—reporters who don’t typically cover crime scenes or need to cross police lines in their work. Obtaining press credentials to cover the protests had crossed their minds, they said, but they didn’t expect to need them and couldn’t have obtained them had they tried.
Farley works at a local “multiplatform magazine” launched by WNET/Thirteen (New York’s PBS station) in July; he was at the protest to report “a smart, thinky piece about citizen journalism,” says MetroFocus Executive Producer Laura Van Straaten.
“We don’t have credentials because we don’t qualify,” she said. She explains:
The eligibility requirement is for individual reporters to have six clips to show that you’ve covered similar events. Our entity is two months old, and they are new reporters—they don’t have those kinds of clips, even though we are part of a larger organization that is an established media organization in this town. We don’t qualify and no individual on our team will qualify because we are a magazine. We didn’t go down there to do spot news.
Likewise, Lennard, who has worked at Politico and Salon over the past couple of years, typically writes features and pieces in “non-combat zones” for the Times. “I’ve never applied because I’ve never needed one,” she says, adding that when she was assigned to cover last weekend’s Occupy Wall Street march, “we didn’t have time to get me a police pass, nor did we think that it would be absolutely crucial for me to cross police lines.”
Gwynne, who graduated from journalism school at New York University in May and interned at The Village Voice in the spring, conceded she had no idea how to go about obtaining press credentials.
The DCPI has thirty days to process a reporter’s application for credentials, but because a journalist has to set up an appointment simply to submit the application to a detective in person, the credentialing process can take much longer.
Chris Robbins, a reporter/editor at Gothamist, a news site that reports on New York City (he has also been covering Occupy Wall Street), began spearheading his organization’s efforts to get DCPI credentials for its reporters (none of them have credentials now) over a month ago. He’s still trying to set up an appointment with a detective to submit his own application, and describes the process as frustrating and one that demands “many phone calls, many e-mails,” and perseverance. DCPI, which rarely returns phone calls or e-mails, has a month-long backlog of applications, according to Robbins.
Yet this system, backlog and all, is roundly considered by journalists and civil liberty types to be an improvement over the NYPD’s press credentialing process that was in place until 2010, and was notorious for being opaque and inaccessible to bloggers and journalists from nontraditional media organizations—so much so that three men filed a lawsuit against the NYPD for unfairly denying them credentials in 2008. As Gothamist reported at the time, the reforms to the system in 2010 were intended to “help the Police Department modernize the City’s credentialing system to reflect changes to the media industry and, for the first time, expressly incorporate online-only media such as blogs.”
The NYPD did not respond in time to comment for this story.
The NYPD’s efforts have paralleled those mounted by police departments across the country, striving to come to terms with new media. In 2010, for example, Chicago’s police department opened its credentialing process to freelancers and non-traditional journalists, and dropped the requirement that journalists seeking credentials be fingerprinted and “of good moral character.”

In 2004 I saw a well-known journalist (@ Nation, Mother Jones) with a very large press credential around her neck 'kettled' in orange plastic netting by the police and arrested after being left to sit, along with other kettled, at the no RNC (Repub Convention). The crowd had been large but quiet and herded down the street, only to be seized and kettled, [like Occupy Wall Streeters say they were, on the Bklyn Bridge]. The cops simply refused to let the journalist go, despite her very visible NYPD press credentials. (I was a video witness). Nothing new going on now. Why are press credentials required? And why are people with cameras targeted by police?
#1 Posted by lauran, CJR on Fri 7 Oct 2011 at 06:36 PM
Moral of the story?
Follow the rules or go to jail.
What's the story here?
#2 Posted by padikiller, CJR on Fri 7 Oct 2011 at 06:44 PM
Looks to me like the issue is police making indiscriminate, mass arrests. If that's what the NYPD has been doing, then special credentials differentiating "journalists" from "people" are counter-productive.
If journalists get special rights and special access and a get-out-of-jail-free card, they will not properly understand what it's like not to have those things, and their coverage will reflect the point of view that comes with that privilege.
#3 Posted by edward ericson jr., CJR on Sat 8 Oct 2011 at 09:37 AM
For once, I agree with Edward...
The issue is whether or not the police violated everybody's right...
Not whether or not some self-described "journalists" were arrested
If the police broke the law, then I'm on the protesters' side of this debate. The people who made or ordered the illegal arrests need to be identified and prosecuted
On the other hand, if the crowd was orchestrating an illegal and disruptive hissy-fit, then a little jail time goes a long way, education-wise..... Especially on Riker's Island.
#4 Posted by padikiller, CJR on Sat 8 Oct 2011 at 10:52 AM
I was the one, with my lawyer, Norman Siegel, who brought the complaint into Federal Court against the Bloomberg administration and the Police Department. I raised the question: " Why the NYPD was the sole agency who determined who is a journalist and who is not." The mainstream media in New York, like they always does kept silent. I am still will like is the New York Civil Liberty will like to challenged to take out the NYPD as the agency who decided who is a journalist. The NYPD do deal with journslist who are their favorite.
#5 Posted by Rafael Martínez Alequín, CJR on Sun 9 Oct 2011 at 11:00 AM
Rafael wrote: Why the NYPD was the sole agency who determined who is a journalist and who is not."?
padikiller: Because they control crime scenes.
As I see it, the cops have two options:
1. Keep everybody out of crime scenes until the investigation is complete, or
2. Use their discretion to let people they trust into crime scenes.
What's the scandal here? Why isn't option 2 better than option 1?
Option 3 - letting anybody who calls himself a "journalist" traipse around crime scenes - is an obvious no-go.
Now I'm not condoning police abuse in any way... If the cops acted illegally then the press should go nuts to hold them accountable.
#6 Posted by padikiller, CJR on Sun 9 Oct 2011 at 11:34 AM
Seems to me that the Police are going out of their way to antagonise the press because they do not enjoy being used for this type of Duty !
White shirted Officers misleading the " protesters " and expecting the Blue shirted Officers to clear up their " Cat & Mouse " tactics is never going to sit well with the conscientious Officers !
There are going to be many " Class Actions " of " ILLEGAL ARREST " when the #OSW reaches Critical Mass . As mentioned in @skippydetour and parrabuddy.blogspot #OSW needs to establish a way to " Marshall " their protesters so as to avoid " Criminal Elements" infiltrating and using the " Marches " to create Mayhem as was done to the London Student Marches that started peacefully and were turned into Riots .
Time that Bankers faced up to the Troubles they have created for us ALL and some Bankers getting Jail Time will curb the ambitions of the other 99% of their numbers !
WHITE COLLAR CRIME is not exempt from Justice but then Money buys NYPD laptops and Bias !
#7 Posted by Skippy ( @skippydetour ), CJR on Mon 10 Oct 2011 at 09:38 AM
It bothers me that so much is being credentialed and related to licensing and certification any more, it seems that a writer, a journalist, paid or not, is only asking for their first amendment writes to be acknowledged. I have desk top published a newsletter sent out to 200 folks, I have had letters to the editors published, I have written and read poetry to the general audience. I have never had a news story published other than when I reported events of my own or others at my own free will, I have not gotten paid for most of it, I don't have a degree in it, although writing is what I have done my whole entire life, none the less I am known far and wide for my writing. It is a part of my advocacy work. So who is a journalist. I am not sure that we should squeeze that into any little box and say this is the criteria. I think that is the wrong thing to do. Anyone that is reporting news, or that other news writers are relying on for one reason or another and whom is also a writer, I think maybe they should fit the criteria? I don't know, you all might think I am just simply crazy too?
#8 Posted by Janie Lee, M.Ed. , CJR on Mon 10 Oct 2011 at 12:19 PM
It's pretty clear that someone is trying to control the message.
#9 Posted by Flower, CJR on Mon 10 Oct 2011 at 02:10 PM
Why doesn't the NYPA issue credentials?
#10 Posted by Trew, CJR on Mon 10 Oct 2011 at 02:36 PM
Because the NYPA isn't responsible for protecting citizens, maintaining public order or preserving evidence, that's why.
You guys seriously can't understand why the police don't let anyone who calls himself a "journalist" traipse around in crime scenes? Or why the police don't let outside agencies decide who can traipse around in crime scenes?
For real?
Think about it a little, guys. This one's a no-brainer.
#11 Posted by padikiller, CJR on Mon 10 Oct 2011 at 03:03 PM
The police do have a job to do, but just because I am a citizen police even if I was a writer journalist that would give me no more rights than others, I think our constitutional rights must be for all of us and not just the few and so did Benjamin Franklin and others that risked their life for the news. Some of them almost got arrested too, and I once had a journalism professor tell me that anyone that was never arrested wasn't a journalist in the first place. He taught it in one of the best programs in the nation, sorry to dissappoint you all, but I still don't think that the credentials are what really matter, it is the work that you do, and your integrity. Shutting people out of things most often tends to have the opposite affect than was intended and ends up shutting some of the very best and most dedicated out, but that is generally for political reasons. That never made for the best news in the first place, the actual reporter wants to get to what the political corruption is that underlies the reasoning for it in the first place, they want to get the real story and not just the one the government says that they can have. That is what a good journalist calls propaganda and rhetoric, isn't it, come to think about it that is not ethical either.
#12 Posted by Janie Lee, M.Ed. , CJR on Tue 11 Oct 2011 at 02:07 PM
For the past few weeks I have been tracking arrests of journalists at #Occupy events around the country.
http://storify.com/jcstearns/tracking-journalist-arrests-during-the-occupy-prot
You can send tips to me on Twitter @jcstearns.
#13 Posted by Josh Stearns, CJR on Tue 11 Oct 2011 at 03:41 PM
Staring to look to me like we have a bona fide mafia running New York City and they run around with weapons and badges and aren't held accountable for their actions. Can we say oppression?
#14 Posted by Arletta, CJR on Sun 13 Nov 2011 at 10:28 PM