It is the type of devastating story that can turn a hard-nosed reporter away from journalism altogether. As the dust settles on the mass killing at Virginia Tech that left 32 dead and several others wounded, young journalists are turning to their blogs to question the mainstream media coverage of Monday’s massacre and their own futures in journalism.
Xenoguyver, a blogger described as an “aspiring journalist” complains that the media resorted to stereotypes and rehashing events like the Columbine High School shooting in the coverage of the Virginia tragedy. “What I’m saying isn’t that these things shouldn’t be covered, but they should be covered in a totally different, more sensitive way: the pursuit of the ‘facts’ has forced the human aspect of the tragedy to the back seat,” says the blogger. “That annoys me.”
A post on What’s left at the end of the day questions how much is too much when it comes to coverage. “As an aspiring journalist, I’m torn,” says blogger Em. “What do journalists do? The names of the dead should be released so anyone who knew them will know what happened. The same goes for the injured list. But where is the line? Everyone gets an obituary, does that negate the publicity these obits are getting? Technically, the journalists are just doing their jobs and reporting the news. But at what point does the news stop and the dramatization begin?”
On The World of Cash, blogger Christina acknowledges her internal struggle as a young journalist. “I am told to be as unbiased as possible, to give both sides of the story, to be neutral and objective,” she writes. “What is wrong with being passionate about a story that you are reporting or writing about? I’m sure more people were moved to action when Anderson Cooper freaked out on Senator Mary Landrieu then any other report on the Hurricane Katrina fiasco. Isn’t that the point of journalism? To make people care?”
Kimmie Dunn, too, is questioning her motivation. “Emotionally I just don’t know that I can keep dealing with some of this,” confesses Dunn, a self-described aspiring DJ and journalist, on her blog. “It’s so sad and it’s the responsibility of a journalist to remain impartial and report on the facts without any emotion creeping in. I’ve talked to some ex-journalists who said they got out of the field because of what I’m describing. They say they mentally burned out because of things like this. I don’t want to do that because I seriously love what I’m doing.”
But the young journalists closest to the fray continue to report the story. Describing herself as a reporter on Words ‘n’ Such, a blogger lauds the student journalists in Blacksburg. “I looked at Virginia Tech’s own student newspaper and it was, beyond a doubt, the best front page I’ve seen in a while,” writes the blogger. “Kudos to the staff for getting it right in the midst of such tragedy.”




It would be nice to see a "professional journalist" follow-uo on the religious motivation Cho indicated in his writinggs..
There are reports that he ranted against Christianity... And reports that he had the words "Ismail Ax" written on his arm (Ismail, according to the Koran, is the legendary prophet who was the father of the Arabs.. Ismail's father Ibrahim used an ax to smash the idols of infidels in a temple...)
There are reports that Cho had a Muslim girlfiend in Indonesia and there are even possible photos on Flickr of Cho in Indonesia (naming him as "Ismail")
It sure would be nice to see some reporter somewhere trying to nail down this story...
But we won't see it... Don't even go there....
Because tracking down (whether to verify or refure) this angle offends the liberal sensibilities of our narrow-minded press... Hands off Islam...
Posted by padikiller on Wed 18 Apr 2007 at 05:08 PM
Wow. Yeah, how about the way he compared himself to Moses and Jesus, pretty Islamic of him huh? Nothing is more anti-christian than referring to yourself as "like Jesus on the cross". Way to be divisive, stupid, and exploit a tragedy all at once, D!CK.
Posted by ummmmmmm on Thu 19 Apr 2007 at 09:46 AM
Once again, padikiller goes astray to make his idealogical point.
According to NPR, Cho's parents were devout Christians and raised him in their church. According to other church members, he embarrassed his parents by rebelling against the strict upbringing.
No one has determined the meaning of "Ismail Ax". There are multiple theories. Perhaps padikiller can understand Cho's motivation to use the name better than most since his screenname advocates the slaughter of the Irish. They may be kindred spirits.
Posted by not the senator on Thu 19 Apr 2007 at 10:19 AM
Not the Senator Wrote
No one has determined the meaning of "Ismail Ax".
padikiller responds
THIS IS PRECISELY MY POINT!...
We need an "I N V E S T I G A T I O N" by some uncowardly "professional journalists" to delve into Cho's motivation...
The "idealogical point" I am making here is that journalists should (GASP!) track down leads... Without cowtowing to liberal PC doctrine...
I am NOT saying that Cho was Muslim... But I AM saying that he may have been, and it MAY be that he was driven, at least in part, by religious belief...
What does the evidence show?... It shows that Cho ranted against Christianity... That it appears that he may have had a Muslim girlfriend in Indonesia... That he adopted the name of a man Muslims consider to be a prophet and the father of the Arabs...
There is ALSO evidence of a possible political motivation - He appears to have been a Bush-hater... And this lead should ALSO be followed...
This process of tracking down leads and investigating them has a name... It's called "J O U R N A L I S M"
But when an investigation is made and EITHER confirms or refutes the notion of a religious motivation, this investigation will occur in the blogosphere (do you see that word "refute" there, Not the Senator? - It was in my intial post.. Why don't you read my posts BEFORE you accuse me of making some sort of ideological point?)
The vast majority of the "professional journalists" of the world are simply too scared to risk offending Islam to even explore the facts... Just like they were too scared to publish the Mohammed cartoons...
That's just how it is...
That's the reality, here...
Deal with it...
Posted by padikiller on Thu 19 Apr 2007 at 12:56 PM
Some idiot wrote
Yeah, how about the way he compared himself to Moses and Jesus
padikiller wroteThe idiot babbled on
Way to be divisive...
padikiller notes the word choice
And THERE we have it...
We can't have "professional journalists" being perceived as "devisive", by asking uncomfortable questions, now can we...
So we all just stuff our heads into the sand and let the blogosphere sort out the reality, right?..
Posted by padikiller on Thu 19 Apr 2007 at 01:01 PM
Welcome back, Padi. We've missed you, what with you having been relatively quiet lately.
Let's take your lead for a moment. Let's hypothetically take the idea that he had a tendencies toward Islam and there was a religious and political reason for the shooting spree.
So what? What difference could that possibly make? Even if it were plausible that religious and political motivation were more likely than the likelihood that the man was batsh*t crazy, what would it change?
We're much more likely to find that your motivation is religious and political. Cheers.
Posted by AhmNee on Thu 19 Apr 2007 at 02:31 PM
AhmNee wrote
Let's hypothetically take the idea that he had a tendencies toward Islam and there was a religious and political reason for the shooting spree.... ....So what? What difference could that possibly make?
padikiller responds
What the HELL are talking about?... Are you on drugs?....
Some of the "differences" that could possibly be made in tracking dowm Cho's motivation are:
1:Identifying Cho's associates (if he had any) and investigating them to make sure that there are no conspirators or copycats among them
DIFFERENCE = Potentially saved lives
2.Identifying websites Cho visited and other sources of his information to monitor them and/or shut them down.
DIFFERENCE = Potentially saved lives
3.Identifying other individuals, possibly unknown to Cho, who may be planning other attacks...
DIFFERENCE = Potentially saved lives
4. Analyzing Cho's history to learn from it in order to identify and prevent similar behavior paterrns elsewhere from others
DIFFERENCE = Potentially saved lives
Posted by padikiller on Thu 19 Apr 2007 at 05:37 PM
I happen to live near Blacksburg and today I took my two sons to a National Forest Service firing range just outside of town to practice with an antique Montgomery Ward bolt-action .22 that they just inherited...
A trio of "professional journalists" were there in the parking lot asking the people shooting on the range if any of them had seen Cho practicing there before the massacre... (I'm not criticizing them for being there or for tracking down Cho's activities-that's their job)
Upon seeing my sons, one of the reporters asked me why I wasn't afraid to take my sons there after the attack...
I'm afraid he asked the wrong question to the wrong guy...
I told him that EVERY single recent gun massacre I could think of.. Va Tech... Columbine... Georgia School shooting... Courthouse shootings... Post office shootings...
EVERY ONE OF THEM...
Occured in a supposedly "gun-free" zone where weapons were ABSOLUTELY PROHIBITED....
If guns are the cause of these massacres, I asked... (Instead of the shooters who load the guns, aim them, and pull the triggers)... Then WHY do we not see gun massacres in the places where we see the most guns?... Like shooting ranges.... Gun shops.... Gun shows.... NRA meetings...
HUH?....
He blinked... A lot.... Then he pretended like I hadn't said anything and changed the subject...
He asked me if I thought that a "gun culture" could inspire someone like Cho to violence...
I told him that since Cho used hammers in his sick video as well as guns, that I thought it more likely that the guns he recently purchased were likely just tools to him... And that his "culture" (a.k.a. plain insanity) was probably influenced by other social factors...
Then it got REAL interesting...
I told the reporter (a nice guy, even if he was a card-carrying moonbat) that I thought it was more likely, given the fact that Cho ranted against Christianity and changed his name to Ismail, that religion inspired him.... And that since Ismail is, according to the Qu'ran, the father of the Arabs, that it could well be that Islam at least partially motivated the attack, and that I thought some reporter should really work this angle hard....
I'll tell you one thing....
If you ever need to get rid of Sky Channel 8 team, try suggesting that they investigate a possible Islamist link to violence...
The whole bunch of them literally backpedalled to their van... It was like shining a light on a pack of cockroaches (nice cockroaches to be sure... no personal swipe intended by the analogy)...
By the way...
It was my first time at this range, and I told the reporter that. I don't know if Cho practiced there or not, but the range is only a few miles down US 460 from the Tech Campus, and is free and relatively secluded... Today (a BEAUTIFUL Saturday) there were only about a half-a dozen groups on the range (one guy had a $2700 .50 caliber sniper rifle shooting tennis balls at 200 yards-WAY COOL)
The range is open dusk-to-dawn... And on weekdays, I bet it is mostly empty...
I'd be surprised if Cho DIDN'T practice there, if he had a car...
I'm just amazed it took so long for the journalists to get there...
Posted by padikiller on Sun 22 Apr 2007 at 12:14 AM
Padi spews some conspiracy BS.
1:Identifying Cho's associates (if he had any) and investigating them to make sure that there are no conspirators or copycats among them
Which the police will investigate and really has little bearing on his religious views.
2.Identifying websites Cho visited and other sources of his information to monitor them and/or shut them down.
If we indulge your fantasy that this was part of some larger jihad the sites would undoubtedly be out of the country. How do you propose they be shut down? Bomb the host?
3.Identifying other individuals, possibly unknown to Cho, who may be planning other attacks.
Ah, I see. Bogeyman conspirators. Check.
4. Analyzing Cho's history to learn from it in order to identify and prevent similar behavior paterrns elsewhere from others
Still not seeing how this has any bearing on his religion.
Padikiller blatantly rips off Penn & Teller.
I told him that EVERY single recent gun massacre I could think of.. Va Tech... Columbine... Georgia School shooting... Courthouse shootings... Post office shootings...
EVERY ONE OF THEM...
Occured in a supposedly "gun-free" zone where weapons were ABSOLUTELY PROHIBITED....
If guns are the cause of these massacres, I asked... (Instead of the shooters who load the guns, aim them, and pull the triggers)... Then WHY do we not see gun massacres in the places where we see the most guns?... Like shooting ranges.... Gun shops.... Gun shows.... NRA meetings...
Yea, that was really interesting the first time I heard it. On Penn & Teller's Bullsh*t.
I doubt this pretty little scene you paint ever happened. Not just because you've ripped off a popular television show almost word for word, but because it paints you as cool and collected ... and able to string together a comprehensible sentence.
The only thing that speaks to the credibility of this post ... well ... is the lack of any original material. That follows your M.O. at least.
Posted by AhmNee on Tue 24 Apr 2007 at 03:39 AM
AhmNee Wrotepadikiller reponds
You are a paranoid little man....
Your ad hominem adds NOTHING to the debate... The fact that you don't believe what I wrote because I supposedly ripped off "word for word" some TV show (THIS I'd LOVE to see... I don't even have cable) doesn't provide any substance...
"Liar, liar, pants on fire" does not belong in an adult debate... Why don't you take it over to the romper room, Sport?..
Returning to Realityville...
1. "Bogeyman" conspirators (like Zacharias Moussaoui) cannot be discovered without investigation...
PERIOD...
2. The FACT is that the media is all over the gun angle in the VT massacre, but deliberately ignoring any possible religious link... You can babble all you want to the contrary, but I've seen it with my own eyes..
3. Ignoring the prossible religious motivation is dangerous... Islam is a legalist faith that requires specific behavior at specisic times... It is VERY possible that if Cho procaticed Islam, even for a brief period, that he encoutered others at a mosque or an Islamic center... And these people, if they exist, need to be tracked down..
4. If Cho had been motivated by a Christian or a Jewish faith, his religious beliefs would have been plastered ALL over the news... The MSM has a "hands off" policy with regard to Islam....
WHY?..
Posted by padikiller on Tue 24 Apr 2007 at 08:42 AM
Forgot how to close a bold tag or did I hit a little close to home? Whether you have cable doesn't matter as that particular episode I've seen embedded on anti-gun control websites.
It's alright, Padi. It just amuses me that you'd actually plagiarized a show that's that recognizable and popular. Good show, it's just one more reason why not a word from you should be taken seriously.
I also find it highly amusing that you're ready to start a witch hunt because Cho supposedly had a Muslim girlfriend in Indonesia. Yet you call me paranoid. I bet Cho was the one who hid the Iraqi WMD's, too.
Posted by AhmNee on Wed 25 Apr 2007 at 02:29 AM
AhmNee Wrote
It just amuses me that you'd actually plagiarized a show
padikiller responds
You need to lay off the crack, Sport...
I haven't plagiarized anything...
And I never even heard of the show you're talking about...
Posted by padikiller on Wed 25 Apr 2007 at 07:07 AM
That's exactly what I'd expect a plagiarist to say.
Cheers.
Posted by AhmNee on Wed 25 Apr 2007 at 01:55 PM
It's easy to defame someone by making baldfaced accusations of plagiarism without providing any proof...
Any idiot can do this,even the most ignorant of the ignorant...
Such nastiness makes a nice dodge from the facts... It's good liberal strategy...
However...
Reality is reality....
I haven't plagiarized anything, despite the libel of the whiny, wounded juvenile moonbat...
Posted by padikiller on Wed 25 Apr 2007 at 06:18 PM
Ich verstehe die äusserung sehr gut. Kauft doch für eure Frauen ein schönes Geschenk aus Shiva Eye Muschel, das macht Glücklich.
http://schmuck-links.de
Posted by john on Thu 11 Jun 2009 at 07:15 AM