The letter is signed by journalists and editors from all journalistic walks: the right, the left, the blogosphere, talk-back radio, the national public broadcaster, network and cable news, and the nation’s big legacy papers—with the exception of national broadsheet, The Australian. There is the News Director of talk-back station 2UE Clinton Maynard, the editor-in-chief of Murdoch-owned national site news.com.au David “Penbo” Penberthy, editors-in-chief and editors of each daily covering Sydney and Melbourne and the single dailies covering Brisbane and Adelaide, director of News and Programs for Sky News, Ian Ferguson, and Eric Beecher, chairman of the brilliant Crikey, among others. Aside from The Australian, I see no significant opt-outs. This is a statement virtually on behalf of the Australian media. (I am an Australian, have worked for The Sydney Morning Herald, whose editor-in-chief, Peter Fray, signed the letter, and was a subscriber to the Walkley’s monthly magazine.) And it’s a brave move; something akin (fashioned to scale) of the editors or chiefs of the Times, the Post, NBC, NPR, PBS, CNN, Salon, Slate, the New York Post, etc., teaming up to publish a statement challenging the government’s posturing on WikiLeaks, with only the Journal not signing on.
The note echoes in parts an open letter sent to PM Gillard—who has walked back a statement in which she called WikiLeaks’ actions “illegal” but who has not made any supportive statements of the country’s most hunted citizen—by various academics, artists, and activists on December 7. In many ways, the new letter could be more powerful and persuasive than that letter, and even the one sent by the Columbia faculty members, because it represents such a united front. Every corner of the Australian media landscape is covered here, and the PM, whose honeymoon period was blip-length following her rise to power in a June leadership challenge and her artless fumbling through the August election, would be wary of putting the press further offside.
It will be interesting to see if a similar move is made on this side of the Pacific.
*Note: The Sydney Morning Herald began publishing the “Canberra Cables” last week. Reporter Philip Dorling has an interesting piece on how he came to obtain the papers from the once elusive Assange, with links to the paper’s full WikiLeaks coverage.

Common sense:
If it takes the government a year to determine if you did something illegal, then you didn't do anything illegal.
#1 Posted by Drake Sherpa, CJR on Wed 15 Dec 2010 at 02:58 PM
Thank god SOMEONE has a conscience. And balls. Predictably, it's the Aussies. Your UK and US media brethren are bought and sold by the government and corporate indluence to such an exent that even in private talks many kowtow to the fake official rhetoric.
So there's no HOPE that the US or UK papers will follow the Aussie lead. But what about other countries? This story affects them ALL. And most certainly not just the English-speaking ones either.
Will NO ONE dare follow these brave souls from Down Under?
#2 Posted by Paul Sedkowski, CJR on Wed 15 Dec 2010 at 04:49 PM
WikiLeaks is doing the job the rest of the news media should be doing.
#3 Posted by Joel Martin, CJR on Fri 17 Dec 2010 at 11:23 PM
A lot of women feel ashamed of their looks simply because of their breast size. Even more will do anything under the sun to have a breast that will make them stand out.
http://breastenlargementwarning.com/tips-for-breast-enlargement-workouts/
#4 Posted by Tips of Breast Enlargement, CJR on Thu 23 Dec 2010 at 10:49 PM
I saw a tabloid headline the other day. It was claiming that Falwell's last, dying, words were "I am sorry, Tammy Faye."
I was almost home before the full meaning of how ridiculous that was sunk in.
I have no love for what the Bakkers were or what they did while they were grabbing televangelist gold. The greed and corruption were one thing, but the spreading of intolerance and prejudice were something else.
In her later years I think she actually managed to make up for it. Especially with all of the good she did for the gays.
Serving prison time seems to have had a good effect on her ex husband as well.
Too bad we don't send more of the televangelists to jail.
#5 Posted by Lucas Forbes, CJR on Fri 24 Dec 2010 at 11:37 PM
I think most people would agree that Julian Assange from Wikileaks is a dirt bag for releasing sensitive military and government documents to twist to suit his own narcissistic ego and political beliefs.
http://enhancexl.org/
#6 Posted by Feliciasmith smith, CJR on Tue 15 Feb 2011 at 03:29 AM
I think Julian Assange is correct & I agreed with you but the whole world wide accept it ! I hope that It will be solved out soon !
http://www.naturalherbalsreviews.com/xtreme-no
#7 Posted by stevecarton, CJR on Thu 22 Sep 2011 at 04:58 PM