Hayes, too, said she voted against the referendum to opt out of the federal law. She supports Obama “whole heartedly, but I knew he was not liberal.”
While at the clinic I stopped by to talk to Thania Fitzgerald, a Brazilian by birth, who came to Missouri as an exchange student and stayed. She is now a research specialist at the university and starting a new program at the clinic to screen patients for substance abuse. Fitzgerald, who is thirty-one, had worked two years as a therapist and saw patients struggling to get health insurance. She isn’t keen on the U.S. system. “Honestly, I wish there was socialized medicine like in other countries.” She said that while the health system in Brazil is not perfect, “nobody dies because they can’t go to a hospital. Everyone in her family is a doctor, she told me, so she knows the system in her native country. “I feel in Brazil people won’t die because of lack of care.”
She has insurance through the university, and, like Paxton and Smale, her health benefits will eventually be cut. She didn’t seem to know about that. She sees some value in the reform law, but adds “I don’t like the mandate. I don’t see how it’s going to work. Everyone has a right to health care but it shouldn’t be forced.” Her solution: allow the state or the federal government to give people the choice of opting into Medicaid. Medicaid is good insurance, she explained. That would, of course, put the system on a path to a national health insurance system, an approach the pols and the stakeholders rejected last year.

Douceur.
Marcher avec
toi est le
tendre cadeu
qui rappelle,
dans le son
du soleil, le
naturel chant
et la docile
doctrine.
Francesco Sinibaldi
#1 Posted by Francesco Sinibaldi, CJR on Thu 26 Aug 2010 at 11:56 AM
Wow. Lieberman goes to Missouri and almost everyone she finds are folks who aren't wild about health-care reform because they don't think it goes far enough -- they want universal care, etc.
Yet polls are showing that most Americans are upset with Obamacare because of the huge pricetag, the incredible strain it will put on federal deficits, the increased regulations that will discourage businesses from putting more Americans to work, etc. And Lieberman doesn't find a single person who feels that way. That's quite a feat.
#2 Posted by frank, CJR on Thu 26 Aug 2010 at 02:00 PM
What Trudy found in general is that people now have a slight idea of how the current non-reform came about and that it is going to be too expensive because insurers are still involved and squandering 33 cents of every one of our dollars we are now MANDATED to give to them-while a medicare for all would have accomplished exactly what democrats were sent to DC to do and for about 4 cents on the dollar. The math is so simple and compelling even tea baggers would vote for it if they only knew of it.
#3 Posted by Scott479, CJR on Sun 29 Aug 2010 at 11:51 PM