Social Security was a different story. “That’s what I have to live on. It has to pay most of my bills,” she said. She gets about $1000 a month, and she thinks the benefit is based on her husband’s income. They were married for fifty-six years. He was a factory worker and died four years at age ninety-three. The daughter of a coal miner, Rose said she worked doing housework for others, but said she “never made big money. It wasn’t easy.”
“If I didn’t have Social Security, they would have to keep me,” she said referring to her niece and her niece’s father. Rose got up and wiped a few tables. She came back and looked me squarely in the eye. “I hope they don’t take Social Security away. That’s all I have to live on. It’s hard. Everything costs so much.” Dry cleaning bills in particular, she said.
Janet Spencer, age seventy-five, was munching a Philly cheesesteak on a street corner when I asked her to talk. She was from Lexington, Kentucky, and visiting the city with her daughter, who was attending a conference. She had worked twenty-seven years as an administrator in a school system and had a pension from the school district. She did not pay into Social Security, which some public employees did not do, so the program was irrelevant to her, financially speaking.
At first Spencer claimed not to worry about Medicare. “I don’t know if these changes will affect me or not,” she said. But the more we talked, the more I learned that she did have some concerns. She told me she “had heard all kinds of things that they are going to privatize medicine. That’s the most scary one,” she said. “If you have a heart attack but are too old, you won’t get a procedure. They will have a priority, and if you’re too old, you won’t get it.”
Spencer continued: “I don’t think privatized medicine will work.” When I asked how she thought it might work, Spencer replied. “Like I said, they will pick and choose who will get care and who won’t, and I don’t know who the “they” are. I don’t think privatization will ever happen.” Then I realized she was confusing privatization with rationing and the death panel arguments. Perhaps that’s what she heard from her news sources—mostly Fox News and her friends who heard about this on the radio.
Our conversation dipped into politics. Spencer said she was an independent although most of the time her candidates did not win. She did not vote for Rand Paul. “I like Rand Paul, but he is not a Kentucky person. He’s not going to be nearly as scary as people thought he was.” By then, Spencer had finished her sandwich and hurried off to the bus stop.
The wind was coming up, and I tucked into the lobby of Wells Fargo bank to get warm. A woman with longish red hair was selling March of Dimes raffle tickets to bank employees on their lunch break. Forty-one-year-old Kelly Murray, a bank clerk, stopped to buy a ticket. She said she works nine and a half hours a day, six days a week, and doesn’t have a lot of time to read or listen to the news. She knew about Social Security and Medicare, in broad strokes. “The Republicans want to cut and the Democrats want to keep them,” was her summary. She did have a couple of other thoughts. “From what I hear Social Security is running out of money, and it won’t be there when I am ready for it.” As for Medicare, she said: “From what I hear about privatization, it would be a huge mistake.”

I fully aggre with everything you have said. I worked wit a company for aqbout 9 years that had a retirement benfit and after the owner died the company was sold and then resold and the second company went bankrupt and the courts let our pension go to the credit holders so I lost what was promissed and now I am trying to get by on Social Secirety. After doctors visits and prescripitons copay and cost of living and may have to compleaty park my car and it is 70 miles roundtrip for doctor I don;t know how will be able to make it
#1 Posted by Joe Beverly, CJR on Tue 26 Apr 2011 at 09:01 PM
Quick note, this:
"He was a factory worker and died four years at age ninety-three"
needs an 'ago' somewheres.
Other than that, good survey of what people are thinking based on what they're watching on the tv news.
#2 Posted by Thimbles, CJR on Tue 26 Apr 2011 at 09:08 PM
This article points out that very little has been said about how the Ryan plan would work. Some very big questions are left unanswered, and uncovered by the media. For example, given that the Republican party wants to turn edlerly healthcare over to private insurance, what provisions in the plan will guarantee (or even encourage) private insurers to sell health insurance to elderly sick people? The lack of affordable coverage for the elderly was one of the main motivators for Medicare in the first place. Do the Republicans propose some sort of mandate? Will private insurers be required under law to provide policies to elderly sick people? If so, will there be premium caps? It's hard to imagine that there would be mandates, given how bitterly the Republicans have complained about them in Obama's Affordable Care Act. If there are no mandates, then what is to become of the elderly who cannot obtain insurance?
From my perspective, these are all CRITICAL questions that have not been addressed anywhere in the media.
#3 Posted by Rick Sullivan, CJR on Wed 27 Apr 2011 at 06:28 AM