Though the former Pennsylvania Senator has performed well and even been called a “winner” by Iowan and conservative pundits in past debates, something about his performance last night—time for a new storyline? primed by Santorum’s Google debacle?—Santorum got more than a few pundit’s wheels turning last night: since Bachmann is imploding, and Iowa is full of Christian conservatives, Santorum could be the next big thing, in Iowa.
One of Politico’s Maggie Haberman’s six takeaways from last night’s debate was that “Rick Santorum has eclipsed Michele Bachmann.” Citing his challenges to Rick Perry on immigration and the fact that he outshone Bachmann last night, she wrote:
If Santorum can make himself the alternative to Rick Perry for social conservatives in Iowa, he has fuel to keep going.
The Huffington Post’s Jon Ward and Sam Stein agreed:
What was clear is that Santorum gained enormously from another strong performance. He has gathered momentum with every debate—speaking with authority and expertise on policy and with obvious passion on issues in a way that resonates with the conservative grassroots. With Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) fading as voters question her electability, Santorum may be putting himself in a position to make some real noise in Iowa, which goes first in the primary process. Depending on how Perry does over the next few months, that could elevate the Pennsylvanian significantly.
Santorum was also a “Winner” on Washington Post’s “The Fix” blog:
We’ve thought for a while now that the former Pennsylvania Senator is doing better in these debates than he gets credit for. Tonight he owned the first hour of the gathering and his hammering of Perry on immigration was a terrific moment. For a second tier candidate like Santorum, the key to these debates is to be in the mix with the big boys (and girls). He was right there all night.
Nevermind that just two days ago, Politico wrote this story about how he’s struggling to find supporters in his home state. It’s good Santorum no longer has butt-of-the-joke status; he deserves to be taken seriously, but this attention—overdue, and all at once—so far seems as much about enthusiasm for movement in the race, than political reality.
Cheers to Dave Weigel for constructively taking Rick Santorum more seriously, and analyzing what he had to say rather than just his place in the horse race.
5. Likewise, falling for the “surging” Gary Johnson.
We get it. It’s Friday, and everyone loves an underdog, especially a goofy one from New Mexico who scores the “best line of the night” with this reference to dog poop:
JOHNSON: My next-door neighbor’s two dogs have created more shovel-ready jobs than this current administration.
But the stardom Candidate #9 is receiving today for this soundbite—which it turns out was a recycled Rush Limbaugh joke—seems a little excessive. You’d almost think he polls above 1%.
But, as the tech whizzes at Google tell us—and as one might suspect would be the case for the candidate on stage that is barely known—Johnson did “steal the show” Google-wise last night, “as searches for him spiked well above the presumed front runners.” So glad they were on hand to confirm that common sense.
***
And a few final miscellaneous thoughts:
• This time, some members of the audience booed a gay soldier and Rick Perry’s mention of “having a heart” for the children of illegal immigrants. Cue Ryan Lizza’s Twitter parlour game this morning: #peoplelikelytobebooedatnextGOPdebate and a lot of writing about the role of audience in these debates. (See what I wrote on that a couple days ago here.)

Why does Santorum deserve to be taken seriously? Last time he ran for office, Bob Casey beat him like one of those animals he's afraid he'll have to marry if gays aren't stuffed back in the closet. If we're speaking relatively then sure, there's no reason he oughtn't to be taken as seriously as Bachmann or Perry or any homophobic creationist Christian zealot likely to attract the attention of like-minded citizens among the Republican base. But is there anyone, anywhere with a lick of sense who seriously thinks he has more of a shot at the GOP nomination than, say, Caine? I mean, barring a Big Bopper/Buddy Holly/Ritchie Valens tragedy visited upon the "top tier," may the Spaghetti Monster forgive me for demeaning the memory of those legends with this comparison, there's no fricken way he's making it out of Iowa.
#1 Posted by Weldon Berger, CJR on Fri 23 Sep 2011 at 09:50 PM
RE: Perry statment... you don't have a heart. I am a 75 year old woman... never had an accident in my life. Well in 2010 an illegal without driver's license or insurance totalled my car ... rear-end accident. I am out over $15,000. Will Perry cover the costs and reimburse me.
#2 Posted by Ms. Stone, CJR on Fri 23 Sep 2011 at 10:12 PM
http://www.WhoWouldTheFoundingFathersVoteFor.com/
#3 Posted by Dan A., CJR on Sat 24 Sep 2011 at 09:47 PM
Why am I not surprised that the author omitted — or failed to notice — that FOX blatantly snubbed Ron Paul? What else is new. He regularly gets last-place debate time, though he consistently places 3rd or better in polls. http://www.huntingtonnews.net/9920
Tune in to The Daily Show this Monday, 9/26, to see Dr. Paul and Jon Stewart further unclothe the statist establishment and its news media. http://www.dailypaul.com/179795/jon-stewart-ron-paul-to-vivit-daily-show-on-9-29
#4 Posted by Dan A., CJR on Sat 24 Sep 2011 at 10:29 PM