Richard Darling is a homeless vet with no place to go. Darling said he lost his wife and his house when Katrina hit the coast of Mississippi four years ago. After the hurricane, he continued to work building warships down there, but then a year or so ago he got laid off. After losing a construction job a couple months later, he came back to New England to look for work. Darling, a fifty-five-year-old master electrician, says he has never been out of work before.
The conversation turned to health, and he laid his Mass Health card on the table. Mass Health is the state’s expanded Medicaid program, one of the building blocks of reform. Because he has no income, Darling qualifies. “It’s not worth a bean,” he said. “Not the plastic it’s written on.” He had tried to find a dentist to pull a bad tooth. One dentist said he wouldn’t do it, and sent Darling to another one who would accept his Mass Health card. The wait was at least ninety days.
Darling had run into smack into the state’s doctor shortage, and he didn’t like it one bit. Doctors look at you differently with Mass Health, he told me. “The guy who has regular insurance versus the guy who has Mass Health is going to be seen first.” He found the wait to see a doctor can be two or three months.
So he uses emergency rooms. He’s diabetic with high blood pressure, but did not appear overweight—one of the two percent of diabetics who don’t have a weight problem, he told me. Recently he waited hours in the ER at the University of Massachusetts Hospital in Worcester. They gave me a pill for the blood pressure, Darling said. “The streets have taken a toll on me.”
Christine Arentz was smoking a cigarette outside Borders Books. She works for the state Department of Public Health. “I don’t pay attention to the law,” she admitted. “I know it’s selfish.” She said that the department discourages employees from talking about the reform law anyway. “It’s not really about censorship,” Arentz explained, adding that they are worried people will say the wrong things.
Rocco LaMonica, age fifty-two, was standing inside the door at Borders. He works in loss prevention and customer assistance at the store, a job he has had for a year. Two years ago he was tending bar at a Boston food chain, but got laid off. “I was too fat, too ugly, and too old,” he said.
“I came here for the health insurance,” LaMonica explained. “I had to use it a couple of times. It’s a pretty good deal. He wasn’t sure how much he pays each month, but knows that it costs $25 for a doctor visit. I asked if he knew much about the reform law. “Not too much,” he said. “I know Uncle Ted was trying hard to push it through.”
Dao Nguyen, a twenty-seven-year old who works in finance at a wealth management firm, said she didn’t know much about the reform law. Nor did she know much about her own coverage from her employer, a Blue Cross Blue Shield policy: “I imagine it’s $100 a month, but I really haven’t kept track of it. Is that crazy? I mostly focus on what’s going into my account.”
She did know that, in Massachusetts, people are penalized if they don’t buy insurance. “From my understanding, it’s a pretty big fine for not having it—like $400 for not having it. It would be $400 a month.” (Actually, it’s about $1000 a year.) She did know there was something called Comm Care. A lot of her laid-off friends were turning to that.

Nicely done post! Really shows how there has been no leadership to explain the law or why health care for everyone is important. Keep up the good work!
#1 Posted by Kirsten Eiler, CJR on Thu 5 Nov 2009 at 09:08 AM
Christmas Outdoor Nativity Set nativity set
#2 Posted by nativity, CJR on Thu 5 Nov 2009 at 07:00 PM
Kristen and others; here's a link to a great summary of Mandated Healthcare Massachusetts; http://masshealthlawtruth.org/mass_health_mandate_truth_vs_spin_index.htm
#3 Posted by Scott, CJR on Fri 6 Nov 2009 at 06:31 PM
I'm watching the debate right now and its pretty depressing how little everybody seems to know about this bill. Trudy, you bring up a most important point, nobody can expect change until they are willing to fund it. This 'reform' is going to run into a brick wall unless they fund it far better. The insurance companies will figure out a way to weasel out of any obligations, they will simply jack up prices on everybody. They know this, of course.
By the way, the abortion crap is really all about ensuring that there is no interruption in the taking of poor young women's babies, and the big profits churches make brokering adoptions.
Women can keep their children in nations with universal health care.
#4 Posted by Charles, CJR on Sat 7 Nov 2009 at 08:11 PM
"abortion crap... [all about] the big profits churches make brokering adoptions."
Sorry Charles, but that has to be one of the sickest comments I've seen. Absolutely disgusting.
I'm not anti-abortion, but I respect others' viewpoints about the sanctity of life.
#5 Posted by JLD, CJR on Sat 7 Nov 2009 at 09:42 PM
Excellent article--thank you. It's truly appalling that the mainstream media nor "progressive" bloggers with a broad audience do not provide coverage and analysis that comes anywhere close to what your series does.
You provide an invaluable public service in helping the public to understand the Mass. Insurance law and its impact ( and its lack of impact!).
The absence of in-depth coverage by other media (print, tv, radio, internet) is particularly disturbing since the "Mass. Plan" is, in essence, the national "Heath Insurance Reform" legislation writ large.
I'm glad you talked with "folks on the street" in Boston. Next will you please go to Western Mass. and Cape Cod where very large numbers of people remain uninsured despite passage of the state's "landmark law" (the number of uninsured in MA is now 5% and rising due to lay-offs, reductions in hours, while we spend $11,000 per capita annually on health care in the state!! source: Alan Sager, PhD, Health Reform Project at BU).
These folks who remain uninsured are unable to afford the purchase prices of the mandated private insurance, especially if you're over 40 yo where the price is really jacked up. So they are forced to either hide from the state tax department or to pay the fine (up to $1,000 a year, as you say) as part of their tax returns, simply due to the fact that they remain uninsured and are not quite poor enough to receive state permission to remain uninsured.
I am ashamed that my state has created such a wasteful, largely ineffective, and mean-spirited law. The fact that the Massachusetts law lacks any type of public option or any cost controls makes me very angry, especially since they are getting away with calling the law "reform". To be honest, I am somewhat panicked that the Massachusetts Plan--which is essentially an individual mandate forcing people to purchase private insurance with no cost controls--seems likely to be wrought on the entire country in the guise of "reform".
To clarify, this is the definition of reform:
1 : amendment of what is defective, vicious, corrupt, or depraved
2 : a removal or correction of an abuse, a wrong, or errors
source: Merriam-Webster online dictionary
#6 Posted by Ann Malone, RN, CJR on Tue 10 Nov 2009 at 03:50 PM
A wonderful snapshot of society. I particularly relate to the unemployed electrician as I'm one of the doctors who sees Medicaid patients (in Orange County, CA), and can't find specialists (of quality, or in some cases, any specialist, of any quality) who will see the same patients that I offer my services to in the field of nephrology.
Should health care reform not include Medicaid reform, we are simply herding people into another stockyard and giving them a card to chew on, when they need health care.
Single Payer is the answer! An d as this survey shows most people don't know, and don't care, until they seek health care without resources.
#7 Posted by Laurence Lewin, CJR on Tue 17 Nov 2009 at 09:47 AM