“The thing about Abramoff was that the president was saying he’s never met the guy,” says Weissman.
So what’s the issue?
“Are they doing it because they want the ability to deny it when it really matters?” says Weismann.
One wonders what the DNC, circa 2006, would have to say about that.
UPDATE 7/23: Late last night, shortly before the President’s prime time press conference on health care reform, White House Counsel Gregory Craig released a letter (available as a pdf) purporting to list the dates of visits by CREW’s targeted executives. CREW, while pleased with the disclosure, writes at its website that the letter “in no way satisfies” their FOIA request, in part because the law requires the release of the actual records. Craig tellingly closes his letter with a promise to continue to review “the White House’s general policy governing the discretionary release of visitor records.” (Emphasis added.)
As long as the White House claims that access to these records is only on a “discretionary” basis, they are denying that the records are FOIAable as a matter of law, and are reserving the right to deny any or all requests for visitor logs, for any (or no) reason at all.
Ends today: If you'd like to help CJR and win a chance at one of
10 free print subscriptions, take a brief survey for us here.