If Mehlman came to terms with his sexuality sooner than his discussions with Ambinder or Politico’s Mike Allen suggest, then he did have the opportunity to reach out to the gay community while in power. And his timing now—unshackled by a (slightly) more tolerant GOP, spurred by the Prop 8 debate and his new work for gay rights—is as political as was his decision to stay mum while at the top of the GOP. His apology is dishonest.
Of course, that’s a lot of ifs. And one can’t blame some mainstream outlets for playing up the impact of a prominent gay GOP-er on the gay marriage debate. It’s a very interesting shift. And Mehlman has as much right to privacy to as Clay Aitken or anyone else who chooses their own time to come out. But we have a right to ask questions that arise in his story when he chooses to make it public. A responsibility to do so in this case, which is about the future of more than pop music or tennis.
“Exactly when did you realize this about yourself?” is a legitimate question here. The whole premise of Mehlman’s public regret hinges on it. As does the LGBT community’s new embrace of him. “Fairly recently” might not cut it as an answer. He should have been pushed. Before Mehlman is emblemized as an agent of tolerance today, we should hold him fully accountable for yesterday.

Emblemized? Even if this is correct English (an my spell program doesn't think so), it's ugly, and doesn't belong in CJR.
#1 Posted by Larry Maxcy, CJR on Thu 26 Aug 2010 at 05:47 PM
He reached 43 without knowing his sexuality? Was he a 43-year-old virgin? Did he have sex with other men but tell himself it wasn't really gay? That seems to be commmon with conservative men. I don't see why that would be any more forgiveable than working to oppress gays while "knowing" (admitting to yourself) that you're gay.
#2 Posted by OD, CJR on Fri 27 Aug 2010 at 11:42 AM
Before this Mehlman's coming out becomes a "game-changing political force in the gay marriage debate" "at a time when the Republican party remains deeply opposed to same-sex marriage"...
We'll have to deal with the opposition to gay marriage by Barack Obama, Joe Biden and Hillary Clinton.
And it is (un)surprising to see CJR fail to mention Dick Cheney's support of gay marriage.
#3 Posted by padikiller, CJR on Fri 27 Aug 2010 at 12:48 PM
In the spirit of good (‘ol boy) form; Mehlman did what any repressed homosexual conservative politician does during his time in the national political spotlight; he bashed the gays. Hmm, looks like Mehlman may continue to have trouble finding a place to stick his pickle.
http://scallywagandvagabond.com/2010/08/ken-mehlman-former-chair-of-the-republican-national-convention-wants-you-to-know-hes-gay-and-a-virgin/
#4 Posted by carouser, CJR on Mon 30 Aug 2010 at 10:22 AM
Oh, how we love a good, public coming out story.
In the spirit of good (‘ol boy) form; Mehlman did what any repressed homosexual conservative politician does during his time in the national political spotlight; he bashed the gays. Hmm, looks like Mehlman may continue to have trouble finding a place to stick his pickle.
http://scallywagandvagabond.com/2010/08/ken-mehlman-former-chair-of-the-republican-national-convention-wants-you-to-know-hes-gay-and-a-virgin/
#5 Posted by carouser, CJR on Mon 30 Aug 2010 at 10:26 AM
Oh, how we love a good, public coming out story.
In the spirit of good (‘ol boy) form; Mehlman did what any repressed homosexual conservative politician does during his time in the national political spotlight; he bashed the gays. Hmm, looks like Mehlman may continue to have trouble finding a place to stick his pickle.
http://scallywagandvagabond.com/2010/08/ken-mehlman-former-chair-of-the-republican-national-convention-wants-you-to-know-hes-gay-and-a-virgin/
#6 Posted by carouser, CJR on Mon 30 Aug 2010 at 10:29 AM