“It got off to a slow start and I’m thinking this is really a missed opportunity on a number of levels. I didn’t know immediately, I found out subsequently, that Washington had been led to believe that there would be wider broadcast of this event within China than what happened. So that was a disappointment. But I thought there was something pretty astute about the way the [U.S.] ambassador [to China] lobbed that question about the Great Firewall and censorship in China to Obama. I thought that was good footwork on their part. So they walk into this thing and they’re getting questions of the order of, ‘So what’s your favorite color?’ and ‘Are you happy to be in Shanghai?’ These students had basically been prepped, with the exception of the Taiwan arms question, to give no opening for anything that would be troublesome from the official Chinese perspective. So they asked the most boring, milquetoast questions you could imagine.
“So [the ambassador] says, I’ve got a question; this one comes from the Embassy web site.’ That might not even be true—which would make my point even better; ‘Okay, you’re fixing your questions, we’re fixing our questions too.’ So the ambassador asks, ‘Have you ever heard of the Great Firewall and what do you think about censorship?’ I thought that was really clever. I don’t think Obama’s answer made the absolute most of the opportunity but he did make some interesting points there. The most interesting of which was, ‘You know, it’s important to hear unpleasant news.’ Here he’s walked into this setting where everything is fixed so that there could be nothing unpleasant. And he’s saying to this group of students and presumably to anyone who manages to follow this within China that setting yourselves vis a vis access to information so that anything that’s inconvenient gets filtered out or blocked, is a bad idea. That was a very good answer and it was very much appropriate to the circumstance, too.”
The wrong storyline
“To the extent that the American media embarks on this trip with some version of this very familiar storyline—that Obama, this great celebrity, this great speaker, this media star, this grand personality, is going to stroll through China and win the day—to the extent that they bought into that storyline and expected it to function, at any meaningful levels shows an extraordinary misunderstanding of China. You can fault that storyline on many other levels, but it shows a total misunderstanding of China. The Chinese doesn’t want to be part of our storyline. Everything about China is set up so that Chinese people don’t have foreign heroes. They do not wish for their culture to adopt foreign idols and to be subjected to foreign narratives. It’s not simply a question of accepting foreign political ideas. It’s a question of building up a Chinese nation and a Chinese sense of identity and a Chinese sense of destiny and of strength and of cultural depth. So everything about that society is arranged deliberately, from education to propaganda to censorship to the workings of nationalism to policing a kind of membrane between China and the outside world.

A bunch of the 100,000 should be our journalism students. Even though we will never let China become the dominant power one of the best ways to stay ahead of the competition is to know them well.
#1 Posted by kevin, CJR on Tue 24 Nov 2009 at 12:29 AM
James Fallows had an impressive series on the horrible, disastrous White House press coverage of this Asian trip as well. His latest, with links to his prior posts, is here: Manufactured failure #6: the wrapup - James Fallows
I guess Chuck Todd was feeling the heat on his abysmal performance and started with the typical cry-baby whining over twitter this weekend. "Waaaa! You "bloggers" don't understand how HARD it is!!!" As if Ms. Fenwick and Mr Fallows were some obscure "bloggers."
You have done a great service in your interviews and your analysis, Ms. Fenwick, as Mr. Fallows has, in your very open and very specific criticism of the abysmal performance of the American press. We really need more of this. I'm a harsh press critic, but of course I'm a nobody and therefore my opinions are easy to dismiss. It's different coming so eloquently and specifically and in such detail from professional peers. If these excellent criticisms have an incremental impact on how the American press reports on important foreign policy issues, then we all come out ahead. Again, thanks for your work here.
#2 Posted by James, CJR on Tue 24 Nov 2009 at 02:23 AM
People (bloggers/reporters whatever) keep commenting about how the students in the "town hall meeting" were prepared or prearranged by the Chinese gov't. Uhhh duhhh...this is China. Does anyone really find that a shocker?
#3 Posted by dave, CJR on Tue 24 Nov 2009 at 08:28 PM
I guess that the Australian Prime Minister who spent 5 years in China as a diplomat may have had some input?
#4 Posted by Peter, CJR on Wed 25 Nov 2009 at 06:12 AM