Ordinary hockey mom, ordinary woman, ordinary American! And like ordinary folks on Main Street, she has had trouble buying health insurance. Twice in the past week, Sarah Palin told us that she and Hubby Todd were just like everyone else, sitting around the kitchen table figuring out whether to pay for catastrophic coverage or crossing their fingers and hoping that nobody would get hurt or sick. In an interview with conservative talk show host Hugh Hewitt, Palin said: “We’ve gone though periods of our life here with paying out-of-pocket for health coverage until Todd and I both landed a couple of good union jobs.”
During last night’s debate, she told the audience that there were times in her marriage where “we didn’t have health insurance and we know what other Americans are going through as they sit around the kitchen table and try to figure out how are they going to pay out-of-pocket for health care. We have been there also so that connection was important.”
Journalists—and voters—need to make the connection between all those families at the kitchen table trying to buy out-of-reach coverage and John McCain’s health reform proposals, which are unlikely to help many of the people with whom Palin says she wants to connect. It’s ironic that Palin realizes life was easier when she and Todd got union jobs with health benefits while touting a health plan that will weaken and perhaps destroy the system that provided those good benefits. We at CJR have repeatedly pointed out that McCain’s plan would force people who have health insurance from their employers to pay taxes on the value of those benefits. Also, the tax credits proposed as an inducement to buy coverage in the expensive individual market might ultimately encourage companies and unions to get out of the health insurance business altogether.
It’s a good bet Palin won’t make those connections, and it’s doubtful her handlers will put her in a position where a good reporter can ask some pointed follow-up questions on the issue. So we urge the media to connect those dots on their own. And while they’ve at it, they should take note of a couple of other Palinisms that crept into the debate. She said that McCain’s tax credit plan was budget neutral, adding:
That doesn’t cost the government anything as opposed to Barack Obama’s plan to mandate health care coverage and have universal government run program and unless you’re pleased with the way the federal government has been running anything lately, I don’t think that it’s going to be real pleasing for Americans to consider health care being taken over by the feds.
Yipes! Obama proposes mandating coverage only for children and his plan is not—we repeat—is not a government-run program. No federal takeover of health care—no government seizure of Aetna and Blue Cross. Joe Biden didn’t challenge the errors, instead using his time to hammer away at McCain’s proposed tax on health benefits. Okay, journalists, it’s time for you to connect these dots too.
"We at CJR have repeatedly pointed out that McCain’s plan would force people who have health insurance from their employers to pay taxes on the value of those benefits. Also, the tax credits proposed as an inducement to buy coverage in the expensive individual market might ultimately encourage companies and unions to get out of the health insurance business altogether."
Curious . . . perhaps I am misreading previous posts (see below), but it sounds like people "may" have to pay taxes on health care, NOT "forced" to pay. I would love to be turned on to your sources so that I can read more about this.
Also, based on the tone of your post, I take it that you are not convinced there are any possible benefits to McCain's plan that could outweigh the negatives. Having personally been in this situation, I do have to admit that I am intrigued by the option of not being tied to an employer just because I need their healthcare plan. I would love to get your thoughts on this issue (as a comment to this posting).
Thanks. :-)
http://www.cjr.org/campaign_desk/mccains_health_proposals_under.php
"Given this history, it was hardly surprising when John McCain made the attack on employer-provided insurance his health-care centerpiece. He would eliminate the tax exclusion workers get for health benefits their employers provide; in other words, he would require workers to pay income taxes on the value of their health insurance, while companies would still get to deduct the costs for providing that coverage. In its place, McCain would offer families a tax credit of $5000—and individuals a credit of $2500—to buy their own insurance. (They’d get the credit even if they didn’t pay taxes.) So far, the press has failed to examine what’s at stake here for workers and their bosses—that, in the long run, employer coverage could disappear, and that, in the short run, they may have to pay taxes on some portion of their health benefits, no matter who wins in November. In effect, it’s an unspoken tax increase which has yet to surface in campaign conversation."
Posted by whysoharsh on Sat 4 Oct 2008 at 12:14 PM
i should be president
Posted by micheal jackson on Wed 15 Oct 2008 at 01:01 PM
HI EVERYONE
Posted by person on Wed 15 Oct 2008 at 01:04 PM
I don't understand politics.
I VOTE ME FOR PRESIDENT!!!!
Posted by Bubbie on Sun 26 Oct 2008 at 07:48 PM
Wonder what Sarah is doing about health insurance since she doesn't have her "public option" government or union plans anymore... Is Down's syndrome a pre-existing condition?
Posted by Cindy Morus, Online Business Manager on Sat 21 Nov 2009 at 11:33 AM