Seen in the context of jealously guarding Somalia’s territorial waters, the pirates seem more like a coast guard than a group of brigands. They are clearly not as benevolent as, say, the U.S. Coast Guard—but then again, there is no real Somali military that could have created one. Piracy is a spontaneous activity, and is driven by many factors beyond ideology and even greed. The same goes for the factional fighting, which can just as often be about Ethiopia’s unwelcome presence in the country as it can a regular internecine war.
The sad part is, Somalia bears a striking resemblance to the site of another internecine war in which the U.S. is currently embroiled: Afghanistan. Years of collapsed, weak, or nonexistent government, combined with a raging factional civil war driven by clan, tribal, or ethnic loyalties, now coming under the sway of an Islamist movement that grows its popularity every time it imposes justice and order no matter how brutal, with security and economic consequences that reach into every neighboring region in a negative way: this could be either Afghanistan in the late 1990s or Somalia today.
That’s not to argue that the same mistakes are being made, or even that the two countries are analogous in anything beyond the vaguest sense. But no expert will ever argue that Afghanistan is an easy place to reduce into sound bytes and op-eds, neither is Somalia. We are better served by recognizing the many factors we cannot control that are currently driving the chaos in the Horn of Africa than by falling into petty, partisan finger pointing. Such behavior simply doesn’t address the real issue.

Its obvious that Joshua Foust has no idea what he's talking abt.
I mean if he is telling us that things are better in somalia under the post ethiopian occupation that he might as well tell us all that Bush was the best president that the United States ever had.
Joshua Foust you are either a liar or a very naive person.
Under the brutal ethiopian occupation 25, 000 somalis were killed by the ethiopian army and 1.5 million were displaced, tens of thousands were raped.
If that is not genocide than i don't know what genocide is.
Today somalia is the worst humanitarian crisis in the world, even more than Darfur.
#1 Posted by Abdi from somalia, CJR on Tue 6 Jan 2009 at 10:09 AM
This article is absolutely horrible and just one more example of Foust attempting to address an issue he is absolutely clueless about. While Foust is quite proficient at attacking others (which he is constantly doing) he likes to think he knows issues that he has no experience with or knowledge of.
#2 Posted by James Foster, CJR on Tue 6 Jan 2009 at 05:14 PM
Abdi, I'm not sure where you think I'm excusing the Ethiopian occupation. In fact, I explicitly call it "unwelcome" and note that it made much of the violence far worse.
James, your critique is pure ad hominem and doesn't address any issues I raised above. Please do so, or refrain from commenting further.
#3 Posted by Joshua Foust, CJR on Tue 6 Jan 2009 at 10:29 PM
The prime cause of the current anarchy and hummanitarian crises in Somalia should be squarely attributed to Bush's blind and ill-conceived policy towards this country. Clan wars might have fuelled anarchy but Washington's labelling the country as terrorist safehaven has created the unintended consequences. CIA's funding of the warlords to pursue islamists was abject failure and in reponse created now the popular monster called Al-Shabab.US again used the poor ill-advised Ethiopians to commit the error the warlords regretted...crush islamists.After the Ethiopians, at the behest of Bush,killed al most 19,000 somalis...the situation is back to square one. Meaning a more sophisticated Al-Shabaab is virtually controlling all of southern and central somalia with the exception of Baidoa and parts of Mogadishu.And Mr.Foust,mind you,despite some similarities,the genesis of the present conflict in somalia has no analogy to that of Afghanistan.
#4 Posted by E.Elmi, CJR on Thu 8 Jan 2009 at 01:50 AM
Hmmm... I wonder about how Islamic terrorism in Ethiopia could have influenced Ethiopia's decision to invade Somalia to the delight of the UN supported government.
Perhaps the money and arms from Eritrea (as well as Eritrean troops in ICU service) could have made a profound effect on Ethiopia...
Naaahhh... that doesnt fit the anti-American narrative. Forget about it.
Fascists and their supporters have an Orwellian method to their accusations. Fascist entities like ICU, which commits human rights abuses by definition, get a free pass... while Ethiopia, the Somalian government and the African Union is convicted in the media of genocide based on hearsay.
You fascist lovers will pay for your lies and unfortunately so will Somalia.
#5 Posted by Freedom Now, CJR on Sun 11 Jan 2009 at 08:02 AM