A clear theme is emerging: Americans bought into the Dream (home ownerships and college educations) without realizing how the reality of those dreams has changed. In combination with a competitive, machine-aided, global workforce, Americans have lost ground and found themselves unable to catch a break—much less a bootstrap. And I think we are only seeing the beginning of the stories.
Carmen Wong Ulrich Social mobility is tied to access to education—affordable, non-crippling-debt college education. Granted, we need even better high-school graduation rates and grades from black/Latino kids, too, but once these kids get into college, the dropout rates are higher for poor minorities, and rates of “bad” student loan debt (read: private loans) are too high. I’d love more education for minority students on how to manage the college system/process, personally and culturally, as well as how to pay for it in a smarter way. While mentoring and working with Latino and black students going into college for the past 15-plus years, the lack of clear, informed strategies to get that degree is frightening. I get the question, “Is this degree worth it?” Hell yes. [But the process] needs to be directed, treated like what it is: an investment, and a business/economic/life strategy.
To Vivek’s point about entrepreneurism, keep in mind that many of us have/had no financial safety net or support, should a business fail, and education is key to economic growth in a less risky way. When there’s no net, you’re more likely to not swing so high.
Farai Chideya How are we supposed to describe class stratification in a country that claims not to have class?
I loved the recent piece by [Salon staff writer] Mary Beth Williams, “On not being middle class in New York City” [which appeared on her personal Tumblr]: “a classically tunnel-visioned New York Times feature about what it means to be middle class in Manhattan. The Times would have you believe that to live in the Apple, you’re going to need about $235K a year. . . . [W]hen the Times runs a feature like that, it treats the millions of New Yorkers who are somehow getting by and raising families and living with basic human dignity like they’re invisible. That pisses me off.”
Carmen Wong Ulrich Silly of us not to realize that “class” exists, but its definition depends greatly on who’s doing the talking, and what about. How someone speaks could have you deem them of a lower “class” even if he/she is a self-made millionaire. Professionally, some deem those with no college degree (or even no grad degree) as of a lesser “class.” However, there is a real discussion about the ability of Americans to maintain a solid middle class and what middle means. Does that mean home ownership? Two cars and cellphones? How much money you make, or what you do with it?
Monica Guzman I’ll echo Mary Beth Williams and say that tone deafness with regard to class—writing about people in a certain place in a certain situation in a way that seems out of touch to those people—is a problem. But it’s a tricky problem. Who else, after all, is talking about class? It’s one of those burdens media must carry, figuring out how to talk about something there’s really no language for, no agreed-upon codes, and little consensus across regions. They’re bound to get hammered when they try. But at least we try. Class is a force in American culture. The denial of class, too, is a particular feature of American self-perception, where it exists.
Maybe it’s one of the many areas in journalism where we have to take risks—where, for the sake of informing the public, we have to pick words and phrases and concepts, do our darnedest to make sure they reflect reality, and put them to the ultimate test—publication. If we’re off, we’re off, and rather than shy away from it, we should own the conversation about why, and how to make future coverage better.
Coverage of race and immigration in America
Farai Chideya If we were to write the mea culpa of race coverage for 2050, what would it be? What are we missing now? And how do we deal with what we missed before?

No newsroom's coverage of the issues and concerns discussed here is good enough, but I'd put WNYC's up against anyone's with similar resources. People in New York and New Jersey who listened to us during Sandy - and people did, in enormous numbers, what with power out and the web and TV unavailable - heard stories about people of all colors and classes who were struggling, or helping one another, or organizing to demand government action.
Our staff covers topics like poverty and public housing on a regular basis, so that experience influenced our storm coverage - and continues to, because (not unlike in New Orleans post-Katrina) the reporting on a giant storm's aftermath, and the issues exposed, is a long-term commitment.
Maybe it's a public radio thing, but just about every one of our reporters seems to weigh issues of color and class in defining his or her beat coverage. A good example is "In Harm's Way," Kathleen Horan's reports on every child in New York City who's killed by gunfire. Talking the other day about why we're doing these stories, Kathleen and I agreed it's in part so that those in our audience who don't live amid poverty and violence are challenged to value an inner-city child's life on the same terms as their own children's.
I don't really think that mindset is so rare in the Mainstream Media that take such a beating in this roundtable. It helps to have a polyglot, diverse staff, of course - and as our newsroom grows (yes! It is!) we have to stay deeply committed to diversity. But isn't the most critical thing that we be curious and empathetic in our reporting and assigning and editing? We're all capable of that.
#1 Posted by Jim Schachter, CJR on Sat 2 Mar 2013 at 06:01 PM
Hey Jim:
It sounds as if you may have taken the article as an attack, which it wasn't. It's a brainstorm about the future with people who are all inventing the future, which is the kind of conversation I like to have. Public radio, for example, tracks well with income levels but less well across demographics less educated. That means there are racial and geographic schisms in listenership... and as any good reporter knows, the people who feel you inform them often can give new leads and new perspectives. Sometimes the manifestation of the diversity of a newsroom is cultural fluency and also some b.s. detection when it comes to self-appointed leaders of "minority" communities.
I'd love to hear more about what you read in the article that sparked your comment, as well as any thoughts on my words above.
Thanks for reading,
Farai
#2 Posted by Farai Chideya, CJR on Wed 6 Mar 2013 at 07:53 PM
The lede on this story is somewhat misleading and merits clarification.
The quote cited was followed by this sentence: "John Carroll, the editor of the Los Angeles Times, who edited this newspaper from 1979 to 1991, recently proposed a correction like this one during a speech on journalism ethics."
It became the set-up quote to a lengthy piece that examined the Lexington papers' coverage of the civil rights movement, or lack thereof. It was pulled out in larger type in the display and garnered much attention.
Tim Kelly
President & Publisher (retired)
Lexington Herald-Leader
#3 Posted by Timothy M. Kelly, CJR on Wed 3 Apr 2013 at 12:37 PM
Can't say enough good things about this intelligent, insightful discussion, which will hopefully spark many more in newsrooms (and exec suites) across the country. Kudos to CJR for making it cover story and then giving it so much space inside.
#4 Posted by Blue Heron, CJR on Mon 8 Apr 2013 at 02:57 PM
How much of a role do the politics and overall financial interests of the owners of the various national media outlets play in determining which news and other stories will receive coverage in the national media?
For example: If covering the news on a particular issue is likely to have an adverse impact on their overall financial holdings, will the owners of those media outlets forbid their media outlets to cover the news related to those stories in an effort to protect their financial interests?
#5 Posted by Ginny Webster, CJR on Sat 13 Apr 2013 at 02:28 PM