
I’ve always regretted that I never thanked Goldie Hawn for launching my career as a publicist. Goldie became my client when I was hired as an account executive at PMK in 1981, a movie PR firm in New York. (It is now called Pmk*Bnc.) I knew I didn’t want this job and had already turned it down when my friend Anne took me to lunch. I’d set up a few interviews by that point in my life, but publicity was only a fraction of my professional and personal activities, which ranged from designing posters to composing music. In fact, at lunch I handed Anne my Walkman so she could hear some music I had written for the soundtrack of a Super-8 Adam Brooks feature called Ghost Sisters (the cinematographer was Jonathan Demme!). And yet she somehow talked me into taking her spot in this obvious hornet’s nest. She said that this job would give me “power.” I truly had no idea what that meant.
Anne was the New York contact for Hawn and Lindsay Crouse (an actress I loved). Anne took me to Circle Rep, where Crouse was appearing in a production of Childe Byron opposite William Hurt. Hurt introduced himself to me, as did John Lithgow, who had come to see the play. Maybe what Anne meant by “power” was that people I was in awe of would come over and say hello to me? Crouse was married to David Mamet, and later that night, it was the same deal—David Mamet giving me a firm handshake and saying, “David Mamet.” Like I hadn’t seen his plays and read every fricking word he’d written. Years later, I would rep three of his movies.
All this was cool, except I had no clue how to do the job. My little coffin room in the PMK office had a great view of the city that Anne had probably enjoyed, but when I got there they were building a skyscraper a few floors down that within a few weeks walled in my view. Down the hall were the more palatial offices of Peggy Siegal and Harriet Blacker and, at the other end, in a junior suite like mine, Catherine Olim—now a powerhouse publicist but who then had only just been promoted. Everybody had an assistant whom presumably they had hired and could fire, but I was stuck with Anne’s assistant, a voluptuous young woman whose golden globes were always peeking out of blouses that would have made Jessica Rabbit blush. She was extremely popular with the men on the client list, which made her far more important to the company than I was, even if I had been able to do my job, which I wasn’t.
Before this, I had worked for a small but prestigious distributor of foreign movies called New Yorker Films. I was hired because I had some graphic-design skills, and the ultra-cheap boss Dan Talbot realized that I could do their posters and catalogs in addition to threading projectors and filing. When I was hired, he said that I was going to have to work with the critics. As he saw my face light up at the prospect, he looked at me with pity. If you loved foreign cinema, New Yorker Films was a surreal place to be: It was a “Bertolucci on Line One” kind of place; it was a “pick up Fassbinder at the airport” kind of place. I set up press for Isabelle Huppert, Gerard Depardieu, Fassbinder bombshell Hanna Schygulla, and directors like Claude Chabrol, Werner Herzog, Joseph Losey, and Eric Rohmer. I had no idea how to manage publicity. All I did was show the films, which were really good. Editors came and requested interviews, and I made the arrangements. This kind of experience hardly qualified me to work at PMK.

As a witness to the period and you in it, I liked your piece alot, Reid. Why is it that every preceding age becomes a golden one? All the folks you mention, with an exception here or there, were pretty straight shooting, classy folk, and make me-- if not long for the day--at least appreciate it more than perhaps I did at the time. Only one observation: that managed, targeted, hand-crafted, conceptual publicity that came out of PMK in the 80s and replaced the wheelbarrow variety has been since over-done and over-thought in its application by the grandkiddy publicists, who've learned the new rules but don't know what makes sense and what doesn't. It's very nearly turned into anti-publicity, as in how can we not publicize except to The Today Show (oh, whoops, they're over, so scratch them) and the NY Times (which is never over). And because it's all so tightly managed now, Viral is the Volf at the door--for good or verboten.
#1 Posted by Harlan Jacobson, CJR on Thu 1 Nov 2012 at 05:57 PM
Harlan, it means a lot to me that you liked my piece. I think the internet is not just the wolf at the door... it has devoured the door and the whole house. There was the age of the studio publicists who could invent anything they wanted and keep stuff out of the papers, followed by the pre-internet age I worked in, and there's now. .. The word snarky didn't exist back then and that kind of says it all.
#2 Posted by Reid Rosefelt, CJR on Sat 3 Nov 2012 at 11:58 AM
Great article Reid. I'll be passing on what you wrote about mystery and intrigue - mystery is at the heart of the creative process, and it's a relief to hear you encourage artists to value it. So many of my generation of artists are overwhelmed by the promotional demands of the era; I think it's because they feel a demand to be aggressively self-revealing. It's a lot more powerful to offer fascinating work, yet remain intriguing. Thanks for the sagacity!
#3 Posted by Zoe Greenberg, CJR on Sat 3 Nov 2012 at 08:39 PM
Thanks, Zoe. Revealing and not revealing might seem a paradox but I know you can navigate it. I hope you're well. Reid
#4 Posted by Reid Rosefelt, CJR on Tue 6 Nov 2012 at 04:07 PM
Reid, I remember dealing with you in your start-up office and how cool and indie you were, the anti-PMK (not that I didn't have some favorites there, like Ms. Smith). Journalists always appreciated publicists who were actually film-literate and not bullshit artists, and we knew damn well we weren't getting the whole story but were just trying to bring enough to the table that it wasn't a glorified press release. Part of why I ended up stopping was that access got so dwindly it didn't feel genuine.
Now the culture seems divided between people who tweet and do every magazine cover and people who don't do any, but I'm just not as interested in reading about them, maybe the mystery is gone or the artistry is too hard to accomplish in a town that makes fewer and fewer pieces of art.
I hadn't seen Lois in years but she remains enshrined in my heart as not just a great publicist but as one of the people who make working in or covering the business feel a little less grubby. never met Pat in all those years but you have painted such accurate portraits of everyone else I trust you. I remember Peggy letting me in to some screening with the proviso, "Are you gonna be NICE?" With daggers in her eyes. I remember nicer dealings with Catherine, Leslee Dart, Alan Einhorn, Mara Buxbaum, it was like its own studio.
I was ready for this piece to go on much longer -- I hope this is part of a book proposal.
#5 Posted by David Handelman, CJR on Sun 11 Nov 2012 at 08:49 PM