The actual “power” at PMK rested in the partners, who all worked in LA: Pat Kingsley, Michael Maslansky, and Neil Koenigsberg. Michael and Neil came often to the office for meetings, but Pat never did during the short time I worked there. She was the one who signed and handled Goldie Hawn and Lindsay Crouse. Hawn was red-hot at the time, having just broken out with Private Benjamin. When the media wanted to interview her, they called Bill Murray of Celebrity Service (no, not that Bill Murray) and asked who Hawn’s New York contact was; Bill would give them my number. I would call Pat up, my voice chirpy with excitement, and say, “The Sunday New York Times wants to do Goldie!” and she would cut me off and say that no, Goldie didn’t have a movie coming out and there was nothing to sell. This was something I’d never heard before. The purpose of media coverage is to fulfill our client’s needs?
I quickly figured out how the game was played: We had a bucketful of stars and a reasonable number of superstars, and anybody who wanted to regularly fill a magazine cover had to cross swords with us (or people like us) or head back to their previous job at Weekly Reader. We made our biggest clients available only when we wanted to, and making them inaccessible increased their allure. Pat also served our clients by offering the kind of sage advice that prevented publicity debacles (indeed, milliseconds after Tom Cruise fired Kingsley, he was mid-flight over Oprah’s settee). When disaster did strike, we were around to sweep up the mess with blandly manicured statements, Clintonesque dodgeball, and even the truth, if it was expedient.
The majority of what we did at this publicity firm was to strategically turn down most of the requests for our clients. Still, the relationship that agency publicists had with the media in those days was generally congenial. If you are booking The David Letterman Show, you know who is right for the show, and so does a first-rate publicist; in fact, it wasn’t unusual for publicists to move over to top jobs in the media, and vice versa. The greatest misunderstandings were with publicity executives at some studios and distribution companies who pursued one-size-fits-all approaches to publicity, unlike our more strategic method. For each release, they created a phone-book-sized memo to show their superiors that every media outlet had been approached, and no stone had been left unturned. These documents are chock-a-block with hilarious boilerplate comments like “Claire promises to watch her screener soon,” or “left several messages for Bernie,” or my favorite, “Sarah is thinking it over,” which usually means, “no, but I don’t want to tell you that yet.” After such time-consuming mishegas, the studio publicists were bewildered and stressed when they secured assignments and then the mean old personal publicists turned them all down.
Simply passing requests for Goldie Hawn to Pat Kingsley imbued me with a synthetic muscularity that lured top editors and talk-show bookers into my clutches. Once I had them on the phone, I’d ask if they’d seen the side-splitting new comedy Under the Rainbow, starring Chevy Chase, Carrie Fisher, and Billy Barty. As I said this, I felt like I had eaten a 50-pound bag of snot. Actually, I always felt like this. I was a midwestern rube who had fallen down a wormhole into an alien world I found shockingly cynical. I lacked the skills and emotional constitution for the job, and this caused me to be fearful and make mistakes. At the same time, I didn’t want to be the kind of loser who quit after a few days, so I chose to be the kind of loser who accepts that every day will be a living hell.
As a witness to the period and you in it, I liked your piece alot, Reid. Why is it that every preceding age becomes a golden one? All the folks you mention, with an exception here or there, were pretty straight shooting, classy folk, and make me-- if not long for the day--at least appreciate it more than perhaps I did at the time. Only one observation: that managed, targeted, hand-crafted, conceptual publicity that came out of PMK in the 80s and replaced the wheelbarrow variety has been since over-done and over-thought in its application by the grandkiddy publicists, who've learned the new rules but don't know what makes sense and what doesn't. It's very nearly turned into anti-publicity, as in how can we not publicize except to The Today Show (oh, whoops, they're over, so scratch them) and the NY Times (which is never over). And because it's all so tightly managed now, Viral is the Volf at the door--for good or verboten.
#1 Posted by Harlan Jacobson, CJR on Thu 1 Nov 2012 at 05:57 PM
Harlan, it means a lot to me that you liked my piece. I think the internet is not just the wolf at the door... it has devoured the door and the whole house. There was the age of the studio publicists who could invent anything they wanted and keep stuff out of the papers, followed by the pre-internet age I worked in, and there's now. .. The word snarky didn't exist back then and that kind of says it all.
#2 Posted by Reid Rosefelt, CJR on Sat 3 Nov 2012 at 11:58 AM
Great article Reid. I'll be passing on what you wrote about mystery and intrigue - mystery is at the heart of the creative process, and it's a relief to hear you encourage artists to value it. So many of my generation of artists are overwhelmed by the promotional demands of the era; I think it's because they feel a demand to be aggressively self-revealing. It's a lot more powerful to offer fascinating work, yet remain intriguing. Thanks for the sagacity!
#3 Posted by Zoe Greenberg, CJR on Sat 3 Nov 2012 at 08:39 PM
Thanks, Zoe. Revealing and not revealing might seem a paradox but I know you can navigate it. I hope you're well. Reid
#4 Posted by Reid Rosefelt, CJR on Tue 6 Nov 2012 at 04:07 PM
Reid, I remember dealing with you in your start-up office and how cool and indie you were, the anti-PMK (not that I didn't have some favorites there, like Ms. Smith). Journalists always appreciated publicists who were actually film-literate and not bullshit artists, and we knew damn well we weren't getting the whole story but were just trying to bring enough to the table that it wasn't a glorified press release. Part of why I ended up stopping was that access got so dwindly it didn't feel genuine.
Now the culture seems divided between people who tweet and do every magazine cover and people who don't do any, but I'm just not as interested in reading about them, maybe the mystery is gone or the artistry is too hard to accomplish in a town that makes fewer and fewer pieces of art.
I hadn't seen Lois in years but she remains enshrined in my heart as not just a great publicist but as one of the people who make working in or covering the business feel a little less grubby. never met Pat in all those years but you have painted such accurate portraits of everyone else I trust you. I remember Peggy letting me in to some screening with the proviso, "Are you gonna be NICE?" With daggers in her eyes. I remember nicer dealings with Catherine, Leslee Dart, Alan Einhorn, Mara Buxbaum, it was like its own studio.
I was ready for this piece to go on much longer -- I hope this is part of a book proposal.
#5 Posted by David Handelman, CJR on Sun 11 Nov 2012 at 08:49 PM