The press agent’s reason for being is the art of persuasion, and there are as many ways to practice persuasion as there are human beings. It was my belief—and it still is—that few do it well, and I studied the best to find the way that suited me. Over time, I discovered that I was willing to turn down business (hundreds of thousands of dollars’ worth, as it turned out) if it involved movies I didn’t personally like. Not that I was noble; I simply couldn’t, for the life of me, figure out how that would work—calling a journalist I respected and saying that a piece of crap was good? I would have enjoyed spending the money, but what would happen the next time I called? Of course I did like a lot of movies that the media hated, but if somebody got a call from me over the decades, they had a reasonable expectation that I might be calling about something decent. At PMK, I worked on a lot of great movies, but there were many occasions when I had to fib, and I didn’t like the unpleasant taste it left in my mouth. After I was fired at PMK, I went back to my apartment and in no time, people were calling me to represent films. Having been schooled at PMK, I was ready.
Since I was a small child, I have worshiped actors and movies, and when I got older, filmmakers. It has been a great honor to have helped them in any way. As I look back over my career, I realize how much this work has given me and how lucky I have been to have fallen into it. Being a publicist has taken me all over the world and allowed me to hang out with a lot of fascinating people, and it’s given me a fly-on-the-wall look at the world of fame and celebrity that very few people have. Journalists always think they know more than I do, but they never get to see what happens after their interview is over and they leave the hotel room.
The big secret of celebrity isn’t that some famous people are meaner than the rest of us—although pampering does spoil you—it’s that they are more likely to be unhappy. Maybe it’s because insecurity and hurt fueled their drive to get famous, and when they get up the hill, they realize it hasn’t solved any of their problems and the only way to go from that point is down. Then again, if they have pursued acting or directing purely for the love of it, rather than the desire to get famous, celebrity is generally as wonderful as you’d imagine it would be, with some occasional nuisances, like the paparazzi and annoying fans. Singer-actor Ruben Blades once told me, “Power doesn’t corrupt—it reveals,” and that’s what I’ve seen my whole life. Many people take the opportunity that success provides to crack up or die with greater velocity than those of us who have never been profiled by People. No matter how hard you try, some people just won’t allow you to help them.
The biggest irony of my life is that I am against the idea that artists should have to do publicity. If we lived in a world in which people could discover movies without publicity, I think it would be a better world. The thing I love about movies in particular and art in general is that they contain things that are ineffable, and journalists want to ruin it by demanding that everything be explained, down to the tiniest detail. When asked by someone I trusted, I always advised them to treat the interview as a performance in which many words are spoken but nothing is ever given away. I’m not suggesting “talking points,” because that is a very tedious way to get through a publicity junket. No, you have to be actively open and alive to the process of holding onto the mystery: That is the most essential thing an artist can ever possess, infinitely more precious than fame.
As a witness to the period and you in it, I liked your piece alot, Reid. Why is it that every preceding age becomes a golden one? All the folks you mention, with an exception here or there, were pretty straight shooting, classy folk, and make me-- if not long for the day--at least appreciate it more than perhaps I did at the time. Only one observation: that managed, targeted, hand-crafted, conceptual publicity that came out of PMK in the 80s and replaced the wheelbarrow variety has been since over-done and over-thought in its application by the grandkiddy publicists, who've learned the new rules but don't know what makes sense and what doesn't. It's very nearly turned into anti-publicity, as in how can we not publicize except to The Today Show (oh, whoops, they're over, so scratch them) and the NY Times (which is never over). And because it's all so tightly managed now, Viral is the Volf at the door--for good or verboten.
#1 Posted by Harlan Jacobson, CJR on Thu 1 Nov 2012 at 05:57 PM
Harlan, it means a lot to me that you liked my piece. I think the internet is not just the wolf at the door... it has devoured the door and the whole house. There was the age of the studio publicists who could invent anything they wanted and keep stuff out of the papers, followed by the pre-internet age I worked in, and there's now. .. The word snarky didn't exist back then and that kind of says it all.
#2 Posted by Reid Rosefelt, CJR on Sat 3 Nov 2012 at 11:58 AM
Great article Reid. I'll be passing on what you wrote about mystery and intrigue - mystery is at the heart of the creative process, and it's a relief to hear you encourage artists to value it. So many of my generation of artists are overwhelmed by the promotional demands of the era; I think it's because they feel a demand to be aggressively self-revealing. It's a lot more powerful to offer fascinating work, yet remain intriguing. Thanks for the sagacity!
#3 Posted by Zoe Greenberg, CJR on Sat 3 Nov 2012 at 08:39 PM
Thanks, Zoe. Revealing and not revealing might seem a paradox but I know you can navigate it. I hope you're well. Reid
#4 Posted by Reid Rosefelt, CJR on Tue 6 Nov 2012 at 04:07 PM
Reid, I remember dealing with you in your start-up office and how cool and indie you were, the anti-PMK (not that I didn't have some favorites there, like Ms. Smith). Journalists always appreciated publicists who were actually film-literate and not bullshit artists, and we knew damn well we weren't getting the whole story but were just trying to bring enough to the table that it wasn't a glorified press release. Part of why I ended up stopping was that access got so dwindly it didn't feel genuine.
Now the culture seems divided between people who tweet and do every magazine cover and people who don't do any, but I'm just not as interested in reading about them, maybe the mystery is gone or the artistry is too hard to accomplish in a town that makes fewer and fewer pieces of art.
I hadn't seen Lois in years but she remains enshrined in my heart as not just a great publicist but as one of the people who make working in or covering the business feel a little less grubby. never met Pat in all those years but you have painted such accurate portraits of everyone else I trust you. I remember Peggy letting me in to some screening with the proviso, "Are you gonna be NICE?" With daggers in her eyes. I remember nicer dealings with Catherine, Leslee Dart, Alan Einhorn, Mara Buxbaum, it was like its own studio.
I was ready for this piece to go on much longer -- I hope this is part of a book proposal.
#5 Posted by David Handelman, CJR on Sun 11 Nov 2012 at 08:49 PM