Yet there was still enduring criticism of the way HuffPost went about its work, especially from those whose stories were aggregated on HuffPost; over time, those pieces appeared at ever greater length on the site, diminishing the likelihood that readers would follow a link back to the source. Google News was, in comparison, a generous aggregator; it was essentially a headline and first-graph operation. Archrival Drudge consisted entirely of links back to the source. HuffPost, on the other hand, was far greedier about holding onto its readers. While it never stopped supplying links, it made them just a little harder to find. It seemed the sharing was to be one-sided.
No wonder there was gloating in media accounts of the 2010 demise of HuffPost’s self-congratulatory, yearlong foray into investigative reporting—one that Arianna had proclaimed was launched to “save” that honored, expensive, journalistic form. The Investigative Fund’s executive editor, Larry Roberts, whom HuffPost had snagged from The Washington Post, left after less than a year, and HuffPost’s attempts to have the enterprise incorporated as a nonprofit ran into a legal thicket, given that HuffPost itself was a decidedly for-profit venture that, as Gawker took great pleasure in pointing out, was the chief beneficiary of the dispatches the unit produced. The Investigative Unit, along with its funding, ended up being absorbed by its partner, the Center for Public Integrity.
And yet, despite the occasional misstep, the story of Huffington Post began to assume a relentless familiarity: month after month, year after year, the metrics moved in only one enviable, and northerly, direction. More and more verticals appeared—Style, Technology, Green, Sports, College, Books. HuffPost readers, comScore reported in 2008, were younger than those of Politico and Drudge. And when, in the fall of 2009, HuffPost’s 10 million monthly unique visits hurtled it past The Washington Post’s traffic, Hippeau took note, in an interview with paidContent.com.
“We are now,” he said, “in the big leagues.”
Exclusive CJR interview: Arianna Huffington on what makes a good “gatherer.”
5. Voracious
A week shy of the first anniversary of their February 2011 union, Arianna Huffington and Tim Armstrong arrived at an already crowded television studio at AOL’s lower Manhattan offices for yet another display of their capacity to command attention.
The ostensible reason was the formal announcement of the latest in a series of ventures undertaken by the Huffington Post Media Group, now a property of Armstrong’s AOL: 12 hours a day, five days a week of live video streaming. The press corps nibbled on lamb crostini with rosemary aioli while several staff Huffington had poached from the Times joined her in working the room.
The gathering was called to order. Armstrong spoke first. He recalled the first time he had met Huffington, in November of 2010, and how that led, many months later, to halftime at the 2011 Super Bowl, when AOL announced that it had agreed to pay $315 million in what was widely regarded as a desperate move to salvage its declining fortunes by buying Huffington Post and handing control of its editorial operation to Huffington herself. “We believe that content is king,” he said. “We also believe that brand is king.”
With that he yielded the floor to Arianna Huffington.
Huffington Post, she said, had evolved from “a fast-moving train to a supersonic jet.” One hundred and seventy journalists had been hired since the purchase—even as AOL laid off close to 2,500 people and shut down its own journalistic ventures, among them Politics Daily.* Even now, she continued, 20 reporters and six editors were at work on what promised to be a 75-part series on the hard times facing the middle class, a potentially dispiriting portrait that would mercifully be offset by HuffPost’s “Good News” vertical—“Man recovers wallet after 35 years!”
The video rolled. An actor playing a host brought a reporter from the On Celebrity vertical into a discussion about divorce, while ads rolled across the bottom of the screen and make-believe viewers were invited to join in the discussion via Skype. “We’re not creating a new brand,” said Roy Sekoff, now the project’s director. “We’re just doing what Huffington Post already does.”

Wow, how did you manage to spell the subject's name wrong in the photo caption?
#1 Posted by Gladys, CJR on Sun 22 Apr 2012 at 12:35 AM
Thanks, it's been fixed.
#2 Posted by Alysia Santo, CJR on Tue 24 Apr 2012 at 12:27 PM
This is a good article but I think you forgot to include the rest of the history of time and all living things...
Seriously, I perhaps spent half an hour reading through this story, and only got half way! I mean, sure it's good to be thorough and provide a bit of background context et cetera, but I feel like there's so much context swimming around I actually know what these people ordered for lunch when they met.
In saying that though I did actually enjoy the first half of the piece and you should be proud of writing such a fine and comprehensive work.
Warmest regards,
Square.
#3 Posted by square, CJR on Thu 26 Apr 2012 at 09:55 AM
Fantastic article with a lot of interesting background information. I feel more educated for reading it; thanks for writing it.
#4 Posted by Sam, CJR on Sun 29 Apr 2012 at 02:00 PM
Many thanks Sam
#5 Posted by Michael Shapiro, CJR on Tue 1 May 2012 at 10:39 AM
So, is the Huff Post brand stronger than the AOL brand now?
Also, what is behind the folding of sites like Black Voices and AOL Latino into what are essentially just channels on Huff Post....just cost-cutting moves?
#6 Posted by Carlos, CJR on Wed 2 May 2012 at 11:41 AM
I really enjoyed this piece, from the incorporation of the sociologist's book to the descriptions of Arianna Huffington's apparent charisma. Not only did I learn a great deal about the history of The Huffington Post, but I also got some excellent pointers about how to improve and maximize my own blogging presence.
Thank you for your work.
#7 Posted by Britney, CJR on Fri 15 Jun 2012 at 03:16 PM
Great article by my journalism mentor Michael Shapiro.
As a reporter I try never to manipulate my readers, to respect them. As a reader I want the same. This quote by Isaf the Huff Post manager "People will do anything for recognition" -- that's why I won't comment or jump on board huff post to be part of the conversation, I feel like I'm being tricked, used, like I'm online and there are all these sleazy carnys trying to get me to play their rigged games for little stuffed animals (badges, ironic tokens from reddit, etc)
Isaf and all web media will learn people will do anything for respect, anything for money, anything for ego, anything to get quoted in an article and on and on. We're complex -- the best bet is to be nice and honest, just like they taught you in 2nd grade -- the old tricks, even if they're dressed up in html or seo or engagement or vertical blah blah will fail just like the old tricks have failed since biblical days.
#8 Posted by Kevin Heldman, CJR on Mon 18 Jun 2012 at 10:27 AM
Aha, so influence is only next door to power in Arianna's house of fickle. But in the end she can't expunge history, viz., the fact that she and Republican then-husband Michael did spend $28 million on that failed attempt to unseat Democrat Feinstein in '94.
Btw, anything in HuffPost today about the 1 billion people who went to bed hungry last night?
#9 Posted by diannesteinfein, CJR on Fri 13 Jul 2012 at 03:50 PM
As someone who covered both Mike Huffington's 1994 Senate race during Arianna's conservative Republican phase and her 2003 run for governor for the San Francisco Chronicle, I enjoyed the piece. But when you say that in 2004 Jonah Peretti flew to Sacramento "for a rally in support of the Senate candidacy of Phil Angelides," there's a problem. Since 1992, California has had two Democratic senators, Dianne Feinstein and Barbara Boxer, and Angelides, as former head of the state Democratic Party, certainly never ran against them. In 2006, however, he did run for governor against Republican Arnold Schwarzenegger.
#10 Posted by John Wildermuth, CJR on Sat 14 Jul 2012 at 09:19 PM
If you run an online business in the UK andAdidas Angry Birds Shoes Black 3D Toy Shoes online
are experiencing increased performance in your site in terms of the visitors you are getting, you have probably thought about enlisting for a dedicated server hosting service. In such a case it would be better to Adidas AR 2.0 Animal Black Gold Trainers online
choose a UK dedicated server solution over a dedicated server solution in another country. The advantage of doing so is the fact that since you are in the same geographical region, you can be able to ascertain that the UK dedicated server hosting company you are thinking of using or have enlisted with have quality infrastructure. Also, in case your company’s web servers have been collocated, you will have more control over the servers since your experts can be able to easily access them.
#11 Posted by adidasaustralia2012, CJR on Tue 4 Sep 2012 at 11:01 AM
A good alternative for rss news aggregation is http://www.todaynews.info
#12 Posted by John, CJR on Wed 26 Sep 2012 at 05:18 AM
Media and journalism both go side by side almost in all niches of the world. Here is better to say that Media is 3rd eye of society in which different circumstances happen and every kind of people live.Clickhere for further detail and obviously you will view a number of rich articles on Journalism and its overall worth throughout the world.In short, the journalists are actual commanders and essential entities of societies which play magnificent part in displaying difference between reality and imagination.
#13 Posted by Android, CJR on Tue 9 Oct 2012 at 07:17 AM
What you have here is about three chapters of a biography. Keep going.
#14 Posted by Carolina, CJR on Wed 10 Oct 2012 at 10:31 AM