[The day the suit was filed,] we chipped in to fly our youngest researcher on the staff, Sunde Smith—because she could qualify for the student fare on the Eastern Airlines shuttle to Washington—to deliver a letter explaining why we were suing to Katharine Graham, who was the owner of The Washington Post, which owned Newsweek. Unbeknownst to us, Katharine Graham was vacationing in the Bahamas, so later that morning, after we announced our suit, Oz Elliott and the chair of Newsweek, Fritz Beebe, called Kay Graham in the Bahamas to tell her that the women had filed suit. And Kay Graham famously said, as she reported in her own book, “Which side am I supposed to be on?”
It just shows the confusion that was happening with women at that time. Suddenly, women had to challenge everything we had been raised to believe was a woman’s place in the world. And some of us had a hard time really doing it. Some of us were angry enough to be happy to do it. I wasn’t one of them. I wasn’t the first to get it, but I did see the injustice of how women were treated at Newsweek.
I have to say, there were a lot of women who came to Newsweek, saw the lay of the land right away, and left, and became very successful writers. Nora Ephron, who was hired as a mail girl—she left right away. Jane Bryant Quinn, personal finance writer; Ellen Goodman, columnist for The Boston Globe; Susan Brownmiller—they all left within a year, knowing that they would never be writers at Newsweek.
Describe the Mad Men-style office environment. That’s something people who are starting out today cannot believe.
The thing about newsmagazines [in those days] is, you have a class of young women who are coming in, and then you have all these guys: married, single, whatever. It naturally sets up this sort of “office wife” situation, because all these women are checking stories for these guys—the “holy writers,” as one of the women said. It was very tempting, and I must say, whether they were married or single, there was a lot of sex in the office. There just was. And of course, after the sexual revolution of the mid-’60s, even more so. Because there are a lot of people in their twenties, and hormones are raging, and the Pill had come, and the sexual revolution was on, so…
And there was no AIDS yet.
There was no AIDS. And most of it was consensual. It wasn’t sexual harassment, you know. As Nora Ephron said, they wanted to sleep with you, and if you said no, you didn’t have to. Nobody was really pushing you. So, on the one hand, there was a lot of sex, and people were having affairs all the time.
On the other hand, there were things that happened that today, you would say, really crossed the line. There were bosses who were having affairs with their direct reports. One of the senior editors who was having an affair with a researcher who reported to him, asked for her to get promoted, and she got promoted. Now, who’s to say why she got promoted? There was an editor who was stalking one of his researchers and said, “If you don’t marry me, you’re going to have to leave Newsweek.” Ultimately, she left.
So what happened after the suit was filed?
[The company] immediately decided to negotiate an agreement and settle; they certainly weren’t going to go to court! They would promise to hire and promote and give women writing tryouts and send some women to the bureaus. They did send some women to the bureaus, and that was successful—the women who had already been doing a lot of reporting in New York did well. The women who tried out as writers—three or four staff women—all failed, for various reasons.

What a great read. Although I'm a late twenty-something female, I'm proud to call myself a feminist and try to educate my own girlfriends on women's history. It's sad that most career women today don't even know who Gloria Steinem is and it's not like the women's liberation movement of the late 1960s and 1970s was that long ago either.
PS: I wish we learned about this case in J-School.
#1 Posted by TaraMetBlog, CJR on Fri 6 Jul 2012 at 10:11 AM
WHY is it still the woman's responsibility to be in charge of the kids? "Every woman in her thirties right now is concerned about having it all and doing it all". How about we focus on SHARED parenting where the sole burden is NOT put on the mommy but daddy -or second parent- takes half of the responsibility. How about changing the quote to "Every COUPLE in their thirties are concerned about having it all..."
#2 Posted by Maria Karlsson, CJR on Fri 6 Jul 2012 at 01:47 PM
This story is welcome. But as a non-New Yorker (and one who worked several decades at newspapers on the East Coast, West Coast and in between) I am surprised that you omitted Al Neuharth. As head of Gannett (love it or hate it), he did more to get more women into responsible management positions than anyone I know -- and earlier, to boot. Faced occasionally with gentlemen editors and corporate officials who tried to defer, claiming they couldn't find qualified women, he directed them to redouble their efforts. Some who benefited from this owe him a lot. Some who tried to get in his way probably would like to punch him out. In any case, though, the industry owes him a lot. While other chains were talking about opening opportunities for women, he was doing it. For the record, I never worked full-time for a Gannett paper, I am not in Mr. Neuharth's will and I do not owe him any money. Rather, I'm just a retired newsman.
#3 Posted by Westerner, CJR on Wed 11 Jul 2012 at 04:26 PM
Gloating about women in journalism denies a growing reality of this and other professions. Within a relatively short time span there will not be many men in newswork. The same holds true for medicine where 80 percent of med school students are women.
But you can count on that govt. mandated HR slogan to remain on job ads...women and minorities are encouraged to apply...Of course HR is probably less diverse than nursing...90 percent women, HAVE A PLEASANT TOMRROW.
You may say so what? So what....generations to come of men dispossed from their traditional roles becoming more frustrated and even violent. Rather than gloating you should begin thinking about the future in a declining society.
#4 Posted by dan ehrlich, CJR on Thu 12 Jul 2012 at 04:34 AM
As a former Newsweek Research Assistant and Ms. Magazine Circulation Marketing Manager, it is so refreshing to be reminded of our accomplishments yet much needs to be done. The title of Ms. was just the beginning and not much has changed since then. Take a look at who is running the magazines and web sites, and there is your answer. It's not just about the visual images being touched up but also about the business. Practically all of the editors, pubishers, managing directors, etc., at these teen and fashion magazines are all green, twenty-thirty somethings and at a size 2, present a very TOXIC, anorexic image for young aspiring girls to aspire.
#5 Posted by Gloria Buono-Daly, CJR on Thu 12 Jul 2012 at 03:44 PM
Thank you for an awesome article. we are trudging our way through the men to release a national publication. THATmag for women. I am a mother of 3 girls and publisher. We are proud to say our women writers are amazing!!
#6 Posted by Rebekah Sweeney, CJR on Fri 27 Jul 2012 at 02:48 PM
Wow - thanks for this. As a mid-20s female founder & CEO of a tech startup, this really resonated with me. I went through university thinking that gender discrimination was a thing of the past, and weren't-we-all-lucky-that-men-and-women-were-now-treated-equally. It was a hard shock when I entered the corporate world and discovered that wasn't necessarily the case, and pitching VCs as a female founder has only been more intense. Now that I have a small taste of what the attitudes in the early 70s must have been, I'm even more grateful for women like Ms. Povich. Thank you for publishing this great interview!
#7 Posted by Kathryn Minshew, CJR on Mon 27 Aug 2012 at 10:40 PM