Time to Start Thinking: America in the Age of Descent | By Edward Luce | Atlantic Monthly Press | 291 pages, $26.00
Is America in decline? Almost since America established its hegemony over the rest of the world in the aftermath of World War II we’ve been worried about this question. The recent proliferation of books about the diminution of the American empire—Cullen Murphy’s Are We Rome? (2007), Morris Berman’s Why America Failed (2011), Daniel Gross’s Better, Stronger, Faster: The Myth of American Decline (2012), Fareed Zakaria’s The Post-American World (2008), for example—indicate that the question is starting to become more intense. But, then, we were worried about falling to Japan in the 1980s. We worried about falling to the Soviet Union in the 1960s. Are things any different this time around?
In Time to Start Thinking: America in the Age of Descent, Edward Luce argues that, this time, the decline is real. Luce, the British-born Washington bureau chief of the Financial Times and former speechwriter to former US Treasury secretary Lawrence Summers, musters extensive evidence and anecdotes to show the reader what real decline looks like. Using recent trends in economics, education, innovation, and politics, Luce argues that, politically and economically, America is indeed deteriorating—and that we ignore the evidence at our own peril. Luce makes a solid argument that America is in decline, but ultimately he’s written a pretty shallow book, one that fails to capture what that decline might really mean.
Luce explains that the declining power and wealth of the American middle class saps the country’s influence. The low test schools of America’s students demonstrate the poor quality of our schools, despite spending more per pupil than our European competitors. We’re no longer leading in innovation and business creation. The large size of our bureaucracy, coupled with increasingly bitter, partisan politics, prevents Washington from effectively governing the country.
The evidence is pretty convincing, and Luce presents it well. At one point he explains the decline of American entrepreneurship through a single story about storage units. The storage business has grown ten-fold in the last decade, and now generates almost $25 billion a year. These storage units are almost entirely filled with the possessions of formerly middle class people who’ve been kicked out of their houses after defaulting on their mortgages. They put their possessions into storage so they can retrieve them once they “get back on their feet.” What often happens, though, is that they simply stop making payments and the storage company auctions the contents off.
Stories like this make the book stand out. The way Luce tells it, the decline is real, and Americans can see examples of it everywhere. (Note also the various reality TV shows about storage-unit pickers; we’re seeing an economic and cultural decline.)
Luce offers lots of Tom Friedmanish interviews with CEOs and other masters of the universe—normally a tedious exercise. But here it seems to work, in part because Luce has found business leaders and statesmen, like Sen. Don Riegle, Bill Gates, Michael Mullen, and General Electric CEO Jeff Immelt, who provide more than just buzzwords; they demonstrate a real grasp of how the world is changing.
Even so, it’s unclear if Luce’s ultimate point is that the statistics he cites represent a simple series of downward trends that can be corrected and addressed through prudent (if difficult to implement) government policies, or if this decline is an inevitable historical trend we are powerless to correct.
Psst! Here's an idea: DRAW BACK THE ____ING EMPIRE! STOP THE WARS! SAVE TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS, MILLIONS OF LIVES! FOLLOW THE CONSTITUTION! Seriously. Are "we" NOT seeing the common-sense remedies? Or are "we" such state-worshiping "liberal progressives" that "we" devilishly OMIT politically unacceptable truths? Everything is Control & Command for the we" crowd: Gosh! What can the govt ("we") do? Spend more! Tax more! Borrow more! Print more! Govern more! More, more more! Dupes... accomplices.. journalists.
#1 Posted by Dan A., CJR on Thu 28 Jun 2012 at 11:01 AM
Re: Dan A.: read the review. The fact that our politicians don't do such such things is a symptom of decline. The unwillingness to take such actions is what happens when empires lose power. Always has been. Always will be.
#2 Posted by del2124, CJR on Thu 28 Jun 2012 at 11:17 PM
Either Daniel Luzer should take a basic course in grammar, spelling, and punctuation, or he should find himself a good proofreader. It's difficult to take seriously the criticisms of a reviewer whose writing contains so many errors.
#3 Posted by Daniel Bratton, CJR on Fri 29 Jun 2012 at 12:31 PM
Daniel-
"If the means be just, the conduct true, praise despite trivial faults is due"
Alexander Pope- Essay on Criticism
I'd note that editorial oversight has largely vanished along with journalism. Blame Craigslist for that. Alternatively you might consider watching a vapid but polished news source such as CNN. The writer probably lives at the poverty line.
This was a good review.
#4 Posted by J Masters, CJR on Fri 29 Jun 2012 at 01:20 PM
"Re: Dan A.: read the review. The fact that our politicians don't do such such things is a symptom of decline. The unwillingness to take such actions is what happens when empires lose power. Always has been. Always will be."
The review suggests that the govt is inept because the feds have not properly or adequately gathered and "invest[ed]" revenue in order to sustain national greatness. I'd say that the feds are thus too active, and too active generally: Congress and the president should undo things. They should cease to act, for a change. A nation with ever more laws and ever more-active leaders will be ever less-free and ever more-impoverished.
#5 Posted by Dan A., CJR on Fri 29 Jun 2012 at 06:16 PM
This reviewer desperately needs some tidying. Was the copy-editor asleep?
#6 Posted by Sarah KT, CJR on Sat 30 Jun 2012 at 10:24 AM