The bulk of The Great American Railroad War is dedicated to Bierce, but Drabelle also details the efforts of another respected writer, Frank Norris, to settle the railroad’s hash. Norris’s 1901 novel The Octopus is a thinly fictionalized account of the Central Pacific and its misdeeds; the book rivals the best of Emile Zola in its melodramatic fervor and political punch. That said, Norris departs from reality in his account of the crimes of the Central Pacific Railroad and its sister line the Southern Pacific, such as perpetuating the myth that the latter encouraged the infamous massacre of protesting settlers at Mussel Sough. Drabelle shows where Norris went astray for the sake of panache, thankfully without undercutting the value of his accomplishment. The Octopus remains, after a century, an enormously entertaining expose of American corporate greed and strong-arm chicanery.
Near the end of the book, Drabelle argues that, despite their successes, Norris’s and Bierce’s efforts against the Central Pacific Railroad suffered from “bad timing.” If only their crusade had come a decade earlier, the author argues, it could have done more lasting good, because it might have led to a reform of the “basic political structure,” rather than a momentary slap-down of a hubristic company. Those who believe that robber barons will always be with us will be left unconvinced. Still, the overall impression left by the enjoyable The Great American Railroad War is one of possibility rather than despair: here’s a model from journalism’s past that might be of use today. Perhaps a Kickstarter campaign to send Bill Maher and a team of reporters to Washington, DC with a specific target of corporate/congressional malfeasance to dispatch?
Click here for a complete Page Views archive.
- 1
- 2
It's called political entrepreneurship, the opposite of market entrepreneurship.
Monopolies exist by way of political entrepreneurship.
Greed drives both forms of entrepreneurship, to some extent. But market entrepreneurs do not use the indomitable coercion and violence of the State to crush competition and dominate their industries. Greed is a constant and a generally benign thing; govt-industry "partnership" is neither.
Your last paragraph gets to the gist: the root of the problem is the govt's excessive and unconstitutional power to subsidize, cartelize, monopolize.
#1 Posted by Dan A., CJR on Thu 23 Aug 2012 at 07:10 PM
Is it too much to ask publishers of railroad books to use cover art that reflects the content of the book? I am not sure a mid 20th century Pennsylvania Railroad locomotive does much to convey the drama of 1860's railroading on the frontier.
When I see a cover like this (even though I try not to judge) I have to wonder what other innacuracies dwell inside.
Rob
#2 Posted by RJD, CJR on Sun 26 Aug 2012 at 12:52 PM