There were the creative managers at the Ft. Lauderdale Sun-Sentinel who, in 1993, assigned two reporters who had been diagnosed with repetitive-stress injuries to security-guard duty at the paper’s printing plant; and the humorless USA Today bosses who fired without severance three newsroom employees in 2002 after they scratched “Kilroy was here” in the layer of dust on a sculpture in the executive suite of the company’s new headquarters; and the geniuses at KMJ, a radio station in Fresno, California, home to Rush Limbaugh’s morning show, who canned their weatherman in 1995 after he refused to improve his rainy forecast for the day of the annual KMJ-sponsored picnic in honor of the conservative commentator (cosmic justice was rendered, however, when it poured on Rush’s barbecue); and the hapless folks at The Detroit News, who in 1976 rushed to print with a story of “a one in a million biological occurrence”: Siamese twin toads, found in the backyard of a local resident, which turned out to be just two ordinary toads “hell-bent on making more toads.”
Finally, what is arguably the strangest Dart bestowed to date: in 2001, the Logan, Utah, Herald Journal published an editorial headlined, “You Just Never Know,” in which the editors revealed “a situation that we think needs to see the light of day, even if only partially.” It involved “a well-paid public employee” who regularly visits “a reclusive woman in a central Logan apartment,” from “beyond the walls” of which “can be heard hours of loud slapping sounds and blood-curdling screams” that can only be interpreted “as some warped, sadomasochistic ritual.” The journalistic rationale? Not gossip or prurient interest, the editors assured their readers, but rather: “At least now you know our community is not immune to such things, and that they don’t always involve people you would immediately suspect of such behavior.”
Here’s hoping journalism won’t top that one in the next fifty years.

The "hot squat" editorial, by Richard Aregood, is a masterpiece of opinion writing, but it figures that the ninnies at CJR would be outraged.
#1 Posted by Newspaperman, CJR on Wed 2 Nov 2011 at 04:03 PM
Aregood says over at Romenesko that "[t]he odd part of getting that "dart" was that it essentially made my career."
http://www.poynter.org/latest-news/romenesko/151855/most-of-cjrs-darts-have-been-aimed-at-conflicts/#comment-354392761
#2 Posted by Weldon Berger, CJR on Thu 3 Nov 2011 at 12:57 AM
Disappointing to learn that Richard Aregood's classic editorial, "Yes, the Chair," received a dart from CJR back in the mid-70s. Maybe that set the stage for the pallid, stick-up-the-rectum, holier-than-thou blandness that now passes for "civil discourse" on America's vestigial editorial pages.
Dick's "Fry him" editorial, which was very much in tune with the blue-collar values of the Daily News' primary audience, set the stage for something else -- Aregood's much-deserved Pulitzer Prize about 10 years later.
I'd like to see CJR start issuing "darts" to the prudish, Kumbaya-seeking mediocrity of the modern editorial page, and sending more laurels to the bold wordsmiths who keep the form alive and kicking (sometimes kicking AND screaming).
Bill Reader, former editorial writer
">http://www.poynter.org/latest-news/romenesko/151855/most-of-cjrs-darts-have-been-aimed-at-conflicts/>
#3 Posted by Bill Reader, CJR on Thu 3 Nov 2011 at 01:40 AM
I've been a Darts & Laurels reader for decades and well remember when Aregood was on the hot seat, so to speak. Reader (Bill) is spot on about the power of that incendiary editorial, for which Richard really deserved a Laurel! Here's a Dart I was involved in a few years back that was richly and totally deserved, against KIRO7-TV: http://katiabachko.com/clips/m... As the Dart rightly concludes, journalists make mistakes all the time, but it's really disappointing when they fail to own up to them, apologize, run corrections and explain what happened. That erodes credibility and public trust more than anything else.
P.S. -- I'm also a former editorial writer, but never got a Dart. Think I was nominated once when I described animal-rights activists as "Namby-Pamby Bambi Lovers." Is there a statute of limitations? Hope so.
#4 Posted by John Hamer, CJR on Thu 3 Nov 2011 at 02:33 PM
Mr. Reader:
A laurel to Mssrs. Reader and Hamer. Absolutely right.
#5 Posted by Newspaperman, CJR on Fri 4 Nov 2011 at 01:14 PM