Bob Jenks, executive director of the Citizens Utility Board, a consumer group in Oregon, said that coverage of utilities exposes a bias in news coverage that favors corporate interests. But when readers tell newspapers they want news that helps them keep their heads above the rising water, smart publishers and journalists listen. When the economy stands on the brink of what some warn could be a major downturn, possibly even a depression, readers are eager to know what went wrong, and what they can do to limit the collateral damage to their finances. And save their skins. Newspapers have ended nearly all beat coverage of consumer agencies that are supposed to make sure salmonella does not get into salads, E. coli does not infect hamburger meat, toys will not kill children and prescription drugs are effective.
When you are seen as a valuable ally of your readers in their daily struggles, they will more likely subscribe, and in turn help keep the vital newsrooms afloat. The Internet is, without doubt, slowly weakening the newspaper as we have known it by siphoning off much advertising revenue. But the Internet can also engage new readers and build audiences, without which there is no reason for advertisers to return.

I'm partial to the theory that the driving force behind the MSM is no longer selling subscriptions to their readers, but selling readers to their advertisers. Through that lens, this story is not surprising.
Posted by Micah Sittig on Tue 2 Sep 2008 at 02:17 AM
I agree whole heartedly. There is a significant gap between reality and what is reported as reality. A lot of effort is required if a reader wants to read accurate, reality based reporting. I find myself surfing news sites for hours trying to decipher what is real news and what is junk news. I would pay to have a service dedicated to filtering out junk news from real news. It would save me a tremendous amount of time.
Posted by Jonathan Rocha on Tue 2 Sep 2008 at 01:33 PM
Not all that needs to be talked about this way is news.
Sometimes a very old idea -- such as that the earth belongs to all of us, and its resources should be paid for, in the form of royalties -- at current values, not 1872 or 1972 or 2002 values -- to the commons.
Not news, but vitally important to TCMITS (the common man in the street), if only he was conscious of it.
Investigative reporting on all the little corruption stuff is sort of pointless when we let the earth's resources be treated as the private treasure of a few of us. Diverting us from the big corruption inherent in how we currently do things.
If we corrected this, that water would not be rising, and most of us would no longer be struggling to keep our heads above it.
Posted by Wyn Achenbaum on Wed 3 Sep 2008 at 04:54 PM