Trippi, a veteran Democratic campaign strategist, was then helping organize what would soon become a national, if short-lived, political earthquake: the technology-fueled, anti-war end-run around Democratic Party politics as usual by a previously obscure Vermont governor named Howard Dean. Here’s how Klein described his unusual new relationship in the October 2004 issue of The Washington Monthly:
As our correspondence continued, my initial, tentative support gave way to full-blown enthusiasm. . . . Trippi slowly drew me in. Each time I opened my email or checked my messages and found a Dean campaign official inside, my interest intensified. Soon I was selling Howard Dean online, then organizing for him around my Southern California hometown. Finally, I accepted Trippi’s invitation to spend the summer in Vermont, working for the campaign. I had barely noticed, but Trippi had turned me from a nominal supporter of his candidate into a die-hard Deaniac.
Sounds like a Paul Begala or James Carville in the making, right? Think again. The Dean experience actually pushed Klein away from party activism and toward what would become his career. “It turned out I hated working for a campaign,” he says now. “I have strong opinions about American public policy, and the nature of working on a campaign is that you have to sublimate your opinions to somebody else’s. It’s really around that time that I began taking journalism more seriously.”
Klein became part of an emerging “Netroots” phenomenon: left-of-center political junkies, native to the Web, who tilted at windmills during the dark reign of George W. Bush and would eventually help refashion Democratic politics and political media. These young grassroots bloggers were basically functioning as political columnists without a mainstream-media platform: among them, Markos Moulitsas (founder of the innovative and high-trafficked community site Daily Kos), Duncan Black (the dour, acid-penned proprietor of The Eschaton Blog, known by his pen name, Atrios), and Matthew Yglesias (well-known even before graduating from Harvard in 2003).
During President Bush’s second term, the left’s newly energized bloggers developed a wry shorthand to mock the political-media bubble they saw enveloping Washington. Morally pompous Iraq war supporters (especially on The Washington Post op-ed page) were tagged “Very Serious People,” since “un-serious” was a frequent slur on the allegedly ill-informed anti-war left. Above-it-all Beltway paeans to bipartisan comity were dubbed “High Broderism,” in anti-tribute to David Broder, still considered by many to be the dean of the DC journalism establishment. “Even The New Republic” became a favored sardonic phrase. As National Review’s David Frum wrote in May 2007, “If even The New Republic finds more to praise than to blame in the left blogosphere, then the brakes are truly off the Democratic machine.”
The Netroots crowd reserved its harshest critique for what it dubbed “The Village”—that unreal political island in the District of Columbia where absurdly powerful people treat important policy like frivolous sport and pretend to disagree with one another on cable chat shows. Connecticut Senator Joe Lieberman—sanctimoniously pro-war and favorite of The New Republic—always seemed to be the only Village “liberal” allowed in places like NBC’s Meet the Press, where he would wallow in host Tim Russert’s High Broderism and cluck his tongue at the uncivil rabble to his left.
“I think a lot of blogging was founded on a very particular critique of the media,” Klein says. “During this period of the Iraq war, there was a broad feeling that the media hadn’t done its job, that it had been hampered by this requirement to pretend the truth always was in the middle. And I was part of that critique.” (Klein was originally in favor of the Iraq war on liberal-hawk grounds that he would soon repudiate.)
Still an undergraduate, Klein found himself attracted to Matthew Yglesias and the older, left-of-center blogger Kevin Drum, both of whom were more journalistic and amiable than the typical bomb-throwing diarist at Daily Kos. “If you wanted to tell the story of my coming up, Matt Yglesias is the key figure,” Klein says. “Matt’s blog was a major inspiration for me, because he was a college student and he did this kind of data-driven, very careful work that appealed to me.”
I see that the ostensibly libertarian author is increasingly burnishing his establishment credentials. Good for him, and savvy too: CJR is a great place to solicit brownie points from the statist elites.
#1 Posted by Dan A., CJR on Tue 4 Sep 2012 at 05:00 AM
I've been an admirer of Ezra Klein's work since the early days of the debate on health reform. As a proponent of the single-payer Canadian system, I hope I can be counted among those who urged him to study the health care systems of other nations.
But having done his homework on health systems that are both cost effective and humane, Ezra joined the "political feasibility" gang, allowing Obama and Baucus to keep single-payer off the table, accepting the insurer-dominated and hopelessly inadequate ACA. Would Ezra, the objective, even-handed reporter, have used the political feasibility argument against the suffragists, against the civil rights movement? Let's hope not.
Given his smarts and current megaphone, I wish he'd stand up and holler, "We Americans are paying twice as much for health care as taxpayers in other countries, yet we tolerate poorer outcomes, and leave millions uninsured. How can we be so dumb?"
#2 Posted by Harriette Seiler, CJR on Tue 4 Sep 2012 at 10:37 AM
Hollering "We (Americans) tolerate poorer outcomes" would be a fabrication. I don't think fibbing should be encouraged.
#3 Posted by KP, CJR on Tue 4 Sep 2012 at 11:46 AM
Matt's "libertarian" readers at Reason.com skip the time-consuming words in this article and get right to the Klein-bashing, journalist-hating, obscenity-laced, envy-riddled screeds for which narcissistic, "libertarian" commentators are infamous. Eschewing thoughtful, on-topic commentary for adolescent tantrums, they continue to wonder why so few Americans take them seriously, and why libertarianism, as a political movement, is moribund.
#4 Posted by Ed, CJR on Tue 4 Sep 2012 at 12:09 PM
INTERESTING STORY, but I wonder if there are not some folks, like Willie Geist, originally from the middle of the country, Vanderbilt, who would also serve as 'star profile' journalist fodder..
#5 Posted by Howard M. Romaine, CJR on Tue 4 Sep 2012 at 02:21 PM
Welch: Keep your head up and ignore the anti-libertarian slights. Kudos on a solid and balanced writeup that, even for one who has worked in same newsroom as Klein, gives shape and an informative context to the trajectory of his career. yours - anonymous pinko-liberal news editor
#6 Posted by pyetrovich, CJR on Tue 4 Sep 2012 at 03:50 PM
Hear hear, pyetrovich. I read every word of the article and I agree: Welch bent over backward (forward?) to balance the article on that phony left-right fulcrum. Well played, Mr. Self-styled Libertarian Magazine Editor guy. Well played.
#7 Posted by Dan A., CJR on Wed 5 Sep 2012 at 08:30 AM
Here's something funny: Todd Aiken is a very, very stupid man. However, he has more real power than 100 Ezra Kleins.
Ezra Klein is the most important journalist in Washington. That's very faint praise.
#8 Posted by oodoodanoo, CJR on Fri 7 Sep 2012 at 07:51 PM
Thanks for an excellent summation of what makes Ezra Klein one of our better policy advocates and analysts. What I find so refreshing about Klein is his dedication to full understanding of the matters he discusses, without indulging in the greatest downfall of most politicos with little life experience outside of academic circles -- he avoids the personal and anecdotal in favor diving into research. Unlike so many other bloggers and columnists whose reliance on self-reference and occasional (Googled?) pithy quotes, Klein takes the time to build his case, present complex issues effectively, and provide plenty of references and links to back up his assertions.
#9 Posted by Jeffrey, CJR on Fri 7 Sep 2012 at 08:01 PM
This is a fine article, but as an outsider to progressivism Welch is confused about the significance of "The New Republic" and the slogan "even the liberal New Republic." I'm 41, I've been following politics since I was a teenager, and my first memory of TNR was its full-throated defense of Reagan's Central America policy; the Wikipedia article on the Contras has a long quote from its editor Michael Kinsley defending their attacks on Nicaraguan civilians. It hasn't been progressive for as long as I can remember.
In the 1980s, Michael Kinsley was joking about how TNR was so often cited taking conservative positions that it should change its name to "even-the-liberal-New-Republic." (As in "Even the liberal New Republic says it's OK to shoot up cooperative farms," I suppose.) It didn't originate in the blogosphere, and Frum's joke inverts the classic line. There are liberal journalists who are TNR alumni, but its relationship with liberalism has always been fraught.
#10 Posted by matt w, CJR on Sat 8 Sep 2012 at 02:22 PM
I have been reading Ezra, Daily Kos and Sullivan for years. Not because I always agree with them. but because I thought they were the ones making the best arguments. They seemed to care about facts and used them to create their arguments. When history, facts or conventional wisdom was against them they dealt with that honestly and tried to give you multiple sides of the argument.
I agreed with Ezra that politically a single payer option was not going to happen, but I think Ezra's big fault was in making it too easy to deal away spo without extracting a political cost from Republicans. Consumers should be able to choose a public option. Why are Republicans supporting limiting customer choice?
#11 Posted by Colleen, CJR on Sun 9 Sep 2012 at 11:26 AM
"Consumers should be able to choose a public option. Why are Republicans supporting limiting customer choice?"
Why are they trying to kill the post office?
http://www.esquire.com/_mobile/blogs/politics/the-post-office-lives-8757430
It's what they must do.
#12 Posted by Thimbles, CJR on Sun 9 Sep 2012 at 12:18 PM
this story is an embarrassment. ezra klein is a partisan hack who doesnt even write stories. all he does is link to, and pontificate on, others' work. how is he even a journalist?
#13 Posted by ick, CJR on Mon 8 Oct 2012 at 05:53 PM
Ezra is wonderfully refreshing, extraordinarily smart and in spite of his lisp that so many people talk rudely about (and he has obviously had speech therapy because clearly, it has almost disappeared) Ezra captures the essence of every issue he speaks about, simplifies them to make the complex seem simple and is on the road to having his own show before his 30th birthday. Watching Ezra host The Ed Show with such ease and comfort would make any parent or follower proud. Clearly, I am an Ezra fan and look forward to seeing, hearing and reading more of him.
#14 Posted by David Cohen, CJR on Fri 12 Oct 2012 at 09:32 AM