There are many, both within Netroots and without, who would object to several of my descriptions and reductionisms, but essentially the movement’s more buttoned-down Klein/Yglesias/Drum wing began to gravitate to The Village—or at least toward its coterie of smallish-circulation magazines of political opinion. Yglesias was nicknamed “Big Media Matt” for getting signed to The American Prospect in 2003. Drum’s blog became the homepage of The Washington Monthly for four years beginning in 2004 (it’s now hosted by Mother Jones). And Klein took his initial plunge as an unpaid intern at The Washington Monthly in the summer of ’04.
(This is as good as place as any to note my numerous conflicts of interest: I edit a monthly, Reason, that competes with the aforementioned magazines; I was one of the first to praise Yglesias’s blog, and also recommended him to the Prospect; I was part of the “warblog” crowd that incensed the Netroots; I’ve tangled with many of these guys publicly, including Klein; and I once enjoyed a cocktail at Drum’s apartment. You can be a relatively minor cog in the wheel of Washington journalism, and be riddled with so many conflicts that the whole Village critique feels inadequate.)
In November 2004, months before Klein headed to DC for his first real journalism gig at The American Prospect, a Q&A with the website LAist.com showed he was starting to realize that his instinct for partisan activism was best served through practicing journalism. “I used to have political aspirations,” he told LAist. “But over time, I found that I enjoy writing far more. More to the point, I think that the creation of a media environment that can sustain and propel progressivism is more important than any single elected official. I’d trade a liberal O’Reilly (or Limbaugh!) for five, 10 congressmen. The media is as effective and important an agent for change as the legislative bodies, and I think it’s where I’m happiest and most effective.”
A wonk is born
There is on MSNBC this newish thing called “The Ezra Klein Challenge.” When Klein guest-hosts The Rachel Maddow Show, producers slap a two-minute timer on the screen and he races the clock to “explain complicated stuff, especially in the economy”—things like Spanish bond yields and why big US banks need to be broken up. Like much of what Klein does, it successfully navigates the terrain between glib and well-informed, whimsical and dead serious, know-it-all and let’s-learn-it-together. Unless you already have strong reason to doubt or dislike him—and few MSNBC viewers do—you leave the experience feeling smarter.
Reading Klein’s similarly expository Washington Post Wonkbook blog, it’s hard to imagine such tart political one-liners as, “He’s like a stupid person’s idea of what a thoughtful person sounds like,” which is how Klein described former House Majority Leader Dick Armey in the Prospect in June 2007. Klein laughs at the memory. “I sometimes feel like I was a better writer years ago than I am now, or certainly a funnier one,” he says. “I probably wouldn’t even write the Dick Armey line now. I try not to be a mean writer. I really do like explaining policy. It’s not a joke; it’s not a stance.”
I see that the ostensibly libertarian author is increasingly burnishing his establishment credentials. Good for him, and savvy too: CJR is a great place to solicit brownie points from the statist elites.
#1 Posted by Dan A., CJR on Tue 4 Sep 2012 at 05:00 AM
I've been an admirer of Ezra Klein's work since the early days of the debate on health reform. As a proponent of the single-payer Canadian system, I hope I can be counted among those who urged him to study the health care systems of other nations.
But having done his homework on health systems that are both cost effective and humane, Ezra joined the "political feasibility" gang, allowing Obama and Baucus to keep single-payer off the table, accepting the insurer-dominated and hopelessly inadequate ACA. Would Ezra, the objective, even-handed reporter, have used the political feasibility argument against the suffragists, against the civil rights movement? Let's hope not.
Given his smarts and current megaphone, I wish he'd stand up and holler, "We Americans are paying twice as much for health care as taxpayers in other countries, yet we tolerate poorer outcomes, and leave millions uninsured. How can we be so dumb?"
#2 Posted by Harriette Seiler, CJR on Tue 4 Sep 2012 at 10:37 AM
Hollering "We (Americans) tolerate poorer outcomes" would be a fabrication. I don't think fibbing should be encouraged.
#3 Posted by KP, CJR on Tue 4 Sep 2012 at 11:46 AM
Matt's "libertarian" readers at Reason.com skip the time-consuming words in this article and get right to the Klein-bashing, journalist-hating, obscenity-laced, envy-riddled screeds for which narcissistic, "libertarian" commentators are infamous. Eschewing thoughtful, on-topic commentary for adolescent tantrums, they continue to wonder why so few Americans take them seriously, and why libertarianism, as a political movement, is moribund.
#4 Posted by Ed, CJR on Tue 4 Sep 2012 at 12:09 PM
INTERESTING STORY, but I wonder if there are not some folks, like Willie Geist, originally from the middle of the country, Vanderbilt, who would also serve as 'star profile' journalist fodder..
#5 Posted by Howard M. Romaine, CJR on Tue 4 Sep 2012 at 02:21 PM
Welch: Keep your head up and ignore the anti-libertarian slights. Kudos on a solid and balanced writeup that, even for one who has worked in same newsroom as Klein, gives shape and an informative context to the trajectory of his career. yours - anonymous pinko-liberal news editor
#6 Posted by pyetrovich, CJR on Tue 4 Sep 2012 at 03:50 PM
Hear hear, pyetrovich. I read every word of the article and I agree: Welch bent over backward (forward?) to balance the article on that phony left-right fulcrum. Well played, Mr. Self-styled Libertarian Magazine Editor guy. Well played.
#7 Posted by Dan A., CJR on Wed 5 Sep 2012 at 08:30 AM
Here's something funny: Todd Aiken is a very, very stupid man. However, he has more real power than 100 Ezra Kleins.
Ezra Klein is the most important journalist in Washington. That's very faint praise.
#8 Posted by oodoodanoo, CJR on Fri 7 Sep 2012 at 07:51 PM
Thanks for an excellent summation of what makes Ezra Klein one of our better policy advocates and analysts. What I find so refreshing about Klein is his dedication to full understanding of the matters he discusses, without indulging in the greatest downfall of most politicos with little life experience outside of academic circles -- he avoids the personal and anecdotal in favor diving into research. Unlike so many other bloggers and columnists whose reliance on self-reference and occasional (Googled?) pithy quotes, Klein takes the time to build his case, present complex issues effectively, and provide plenty of references and links to back up his assertions.
#9 Posted by Jeffrey, CJR on Fri 7 Sep 2012 at 08:01 PM
This is a fine article, but as an outsider to progressivism Welch is confused about the significance of "The New Republic" and the slogan "even the liberal New Republic." I'm 41, I've been following politics since I was a teenager, and my first memory of TNR was its full-throated defense of Reagan's Central America policy; the Wikipedia article on the Contras has a long quote from its editor Michael Kinsley defending their attacks on Nicaraguan civilians. It hasn't been progressive for as long as I can remember.
In the 1980s, Michael Kinsley was joking about how TNR was so often cited taking conservative positions that it should change its name to "even-the-liberal-New-Republic." (As in "Even the liberal New Republic says it's OK to shoot up cooperative farms," I suppose.) It didn't originate in the blogosphere, and Frum's joke inverts the classic line. There are liberal journalists who are TNR alumni, but its relationship with liberalism has always been fraught.
#10 Posted by matt w, CJR on Sat 8 Sep 2012 at 02:22 PM
I have been reading Ezra, Daily Kos and Sullivan for years. Not because I always agree with them. but because I thought they were the ones making the best arguments. They seemed to care about facts and used them to create their arguments. When history, facts or conventional wisdom was against them they dealt with that honestly and tried to give you multiple sides of the argument.
I agreed with Ezra that politically a single payer option was not going to happen, but I think Ezra's big fault was in making it too easy to deal away spo without extracting a political cost from Republicans. Consumers should be able to choose a public option. Why are Republicans supporting limiting customer choice?
#11 Posted by Colleen, CJR on Sun 9 Sep 2012 at 11:26 AM
"Consumers should be able to choose a public option. Why are Republicans supporting limiting customer choice?"
Why are they trying to kill the post office?
http://www.esquire.com/_mobile/blogs/politics/the-post-office-lives-8757430
It's what they must do.
#12 Posted by Thimbles, CJR on Sun 9 Sep 2012 at 12:18 PM
this story is an embarrassment. ezra klein is a partisan hack who doesnt even write stories. all he does is link to, and pontificate on, others' work. how is he even a journalist?
#13 Posted by ick, CJR on Mon 8 Oct 2012 at 05:53 PM
Ezra is wonderfully refreshing, extraordinarily smart and in spite of his lisp that so many people talk rudely about (and he has obviously had speech therapy because clearly, it has almost disappeared) Ezra captures the essence of every issue he speaks about, simplifies them to make the complex seem simple and is on the road to having his own show before his 30th birthday. Watching Ezra host The Ed Show with such ease and comfort would make any parent or follower proud. Clearly, I am an Ezra fan and look forward to seeing, hearing and reading more of him.
#14 Posted by David Cohen, CJR on Fri 12 Oct 2012 at 09:32 AM