One evening in February 2009, the artist Shepard Fairey spoke at the New York Public Library. He was discussing his famous silkscreen poster Hope, which bore Barack Obama’s face, shadowed by swirling red and blue patterns. At the event, Fairey sat with legs akimbo, artfully slouched before the gilded, packed room, still retaining his old skate-punk persona. Speaking in a skater’s staccato pidgin, he said he was “stoked” about the poster and had “diligently perpetuated” the image on his own dime, putting it up on Facebook and MySpace and e-mailing it far and wide.
Fairey had been an haute graffiti artist for two decades. He borrowed from existing images in order to create silkscreens that mocked American corporate culture or extolled rock stars. He plastered these images across cities and towns, in what could be called anti-advertising advertising campaigns, testing the boundary between thievery and homage. All in all, he was pretty appealing, with his tufts of hair, drolly subversive demeanor, and images-must-be-free stance. I found myself nodding along as he spoke that night, in discussion with that chic legal scholar Lawrence Lessig, a founding father of “free culture.”
Complete access to this article will soon be available for purchase. Subscribers will be able to access this article, and the rest of CJR’s magazine archive, for free. Select articles from the last 6 months will remain free for all visitors to CJR.org.




The word "akimbo" refers to a body position with the arms on the hips, elbows bowed out at a right angle. You cannot sit with "legs akimbo" (second sentence). If that's nit-picking, so be it, but I'm fed up with this style-over-substance way of writing and I quit reading right there.
Posted by Jake on Fri 10 Jul 2009 at 02:39 PM
Jake, after reading both Hothouse Kids and Branded (the later I gave up on half way through) I quickly learned that Quart is style-over-substance because her work lacks substance.
Posted by Mike H on Fri 10 Jul 2009 at 03:38 PM
From Merriam-Webster's entry on akimbo:
1 : having the hand on the hip and the elbow turned outward
2 : set in a bent position (a tailor sitting with legs akimbo)
Posted by Justin Peters on Fri 10 Jul 2009 at 04:50 PM
Well played, Mr. Peters, well played. Away I go, a wiser man, determined to make my point in a smarter fashion next time.
Posted by Jake on Fri 10 Jul 2009 at 09:23 PM
Hm. I had high hopes that this article might mark a turning point in CJR's coverage of the media collapse, but no. Instead of trying to figure out a way to pay me, I will now be attributed. Gee! I'll be sure and spend my "attribution currency" at the supermarket for "real food."
Look, I'm a freelancer. I want to get paid. In dollars. (Or euros.) I'd prefer to be attributed as well. But given a choice, I'll take the former every time, thank you. Why is this so hard for new media pundits to understand?
Also, lost in this idea that people will somehow monetize their work by reputation, marketing, public showcases, etc., is the fact that all of that takes away time from the actual _work_. I already spend one-third of my time as a freelancer in what might be considered "marketing." Now I'm expected to spend even more time on non-money-making activities in the hopes of monetizing my reputation? No thanks.
Posted by Christopher Allbritton on Mon 13 Jul 2009 at 01:39 PM
Nice essay. As an illustrator I get the attribution bait on a daily basis, but I didn't get Googles latest bait (they have asked us, illustrators, for free work recently- this has created quite a stir). I would've like this article to concentrate more on the technical aspect of what is or isn't wrongdoing here. This would mean exploring the idea of precedent in an art or illustration context. Illustrators like Sean McCabe and John Ritter have been Zeroxing photos for The New Yorker for years with no photo attribution. Isn't this a "progessive" publication? Was there a legal "appropriation" precedent set with Koons, Warhol, etc?
Note to Kirkland Ellis/ Brenden Kho: I will not be representing you in Fairey v AP. There was no malicious intent by Fairey in this adventure. Get over yourselves.
Posted by felix sockwell on Wed 15 Jul 2009 at 11:40 AM
When I use Shepherd Fairey's poster in the book I'm writing on glamour, can I pay in attribution currency?
Posted by Virginia Postrel on Wed 22 Jul 2009 at 01:12 AM
How fascinating to be lectured on the dangers of free content by a publication that doesn't allow us to pay for their online content...
Posted by Jonathan on Sat 22 Aug 2009 at 03:01 AM