In May, high above the streets of the city he patrolled for years, often with honor and distinction, the alleged leader of the torture ring, Jon Burge—a burly, first-through-the-door, decorated Vietnam veteran—went on trial in federal district court in Chicago. Burge’s path to the Dearborn Street courthouse was blazed by the more than 100,000 words Conroy wrote over the years about the case.
But Burge, who is sixty-two, lives in Florida on a police pension, and is reportedly battling cancer, is not facing charges of torture. The statute of limitations on that charge ran out long ago. Instead, he is facing perjury and obstruction of justice for allegedly lying in 2003 during a civil suit about his role in the torture ring. Burge has always maintained his innocence. One of his lawyers, Richard Beuke, refused to comment on the case or Conroy. Beuke said Burge would not comment either.
No journalist knows more about Burge, or the band of alleged torturers in blue he is supposed to have led, than Conroy. Yet, on the first day of jury selection in early May, Conroy didn’t have an assignment to cover the trial. He showed up in the twenty-fifth-floor courtroom anyway. Faith and stubbornness made him go. “I’ll probably cover it for somebody, hopefully not full of resentment for what I’m being paid,’’ he says. “Part of me is wondering why I’m doing this. I guess there’s this sense of seeing something through. And I actually think I could cover this case pretty well.’’
Conroy sat about twenty-five feet behind Burge. From behind, Conroy says, Burge looked much the same as he did when they first met in 1989. When Burge slowly got out of his chair and said, “Good morning, ladies and gentlemen,’’ to the prospective jurors, Conroy says he recognized “the same gravelly voice.’’
When the proceedings finished for the day, Conroy lingered, hoping to have a word with Burge. But Burge and his lawyers left too quickly. “I would have said hello,’’ Conroy says. “I don’t know how he feels about what I have done. There are a lot of people out there screaming that Jon Burge is a monster, but I have not portrayed Jon Burge as a monster.’’ In a 2005 piece, for example, Conroy dug into Burge’s army record from the 1960s that described how the eighteen-year-old recruit went on to become a military policeman in Korea, “gathering five letters of appreciation from superiors that praised his loyalty, devotion to duty, outstanding performance, military bearing, appearance, attention to detail, tact, and extra effort.”
In 1968, Burge volunteered for Vietnam. He returned home in 1969 and soon joined the Chicago Police Department. In 1972, Conroy wrote, Burge prevented a twenty-two-year-old woman on the South Side from committing suicide by jamming his thumb into the firing mechanism an instant before she squeezed the trigger.
“I think if you were to look at the press coverage of Jon Burge and look who has written about the heroic things that he did on the job and in Vietnam, I’m pretty much solo,’’ Conroy adds. “If someone else did it too, they took it from my coverage.’’
As a young reporter in the mid-1970s, Conroy was about to leave his job at Chicago Magazine. Both man and magazine were young and raw, and he planned to move to South America to make his mark as a foreign correspondent. But a colleague convinced him to move instead to South Chicago, the land of steel mills and the tough people who worked them—Serbs, Croatians, Latinos, and African Americans. The colleague told him there were great stories to be told about urban politics, union conflicts, race, and the fading American dream. It was the gritty stuff of Upton Sinclair and Nelson Algren. Conroy agreed.

I was/am (not sure really) an aspiring Chicago-area journalist who's interned at the Reader, among other places. When I was deciding whether to pursue the field before graduating last year, I talked to many journalists I admire, all of whom 1) responded to my emails, which was something of a surprise 2) said "no" with varying degrees of emphasis.
I emailed John Conroy, too.
His "no" was the most emphatic. "If you can do anything else, anything at all," he said. "Do it."
Well, I couldn't find a job in journalism--got beat out for an entry-level beat reporting job in rural IL by a laid-off Sun-Times reporter in one case--so I took my liberal arts degree and Did Something Else. It's going well and I really like my job, and I'm still writing for the public good. Conroy's "no" was one of the most disheartening, though. I had hoped that maybe his prospects had picked up since then, but it doesn't seem like it. Thanks for a great piece.
#1 Posted by KB, CJR on Fri 16 Jul 2010 at 02:28 PM
Thanks for sharing this account of John Conroy's predicament. About 10 years ago, I spent a summer in Chicago for the Academy for Alternative Journalism, a program I think was co-sponsored by the Chicago Reader and Medill. John came to speak to our class about public records and research techniques. Since I was introduced to his work, I regard it as the standard to which I always aspire. Besides all the individuals he has helped through his stories, the voiceless for whom he has brought justice, I hope that John also knows that there are journalists and writers out there who are inspired by his lifelong commitment to the fundamental purpose of journalism--to reveal the truth, to tell meaningful stories that make a difference. I know I appreciate the example he has set. I appreciate the life he has chosen and the sacrifices that have come with it. I appreciate his diligence and his persistence, and on some level I hope that he believes it was worth it. Because it was.
#2 Posted by C. Lo, CJR on Fri 16 Jul 2010 at 03:37 PM
Alllowing seasoned investigative reporters like John Conroy to languish is a mortal sin. A sin this society will pay for in years to come. I know of too many good reporters who have been 'laid off' for any number of reasons - mostly because the bosses can be replace them with younger and cheaper writers - with no history or understanding of the elements that can compound a story. His experience is a gift and one that ANY self-respecting news outlet should welcome - Especially in Chicago. Step up to the plate all you publishers and editors in chief -- HIRE THIS MAN !
#3 Posted by Maureen McFadden, CJR on Fri 16 Jul 2010 at 09:49 PM
Conroy was recently interviewed by Bob Garfield for NPR's On the Media. It's worth checking out if his story moves you. And it should.
#4 Posted by Justin, CJR on Sun 18 Jul 2010 at 07:40 AM
I was visiting Chicago about a week ago when I saw the Reader story about Burge’s case with John’s last name in the hed. John and I share a name, a profession, the same struggles, and almost the same ages. I have followed his career since I first saw John’s name printed in a Northern California newspaper listing for a speaking tour he was conducting back in the early ‘80s, I believe. Having spent time in the north of Ireland myself and written about the Troubles for publications such as the Los Angeles Reader and Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, I have long admired John’s work.
Andrea D. Lyon, the defense attorney quoted in the CJR story, is correct. John is an unsung hero, and it’s a cliché now to point out that corruption, torture, and malfeasance will go unchecked because journalists of John’s caliber are now longer on the case. Here in Southern California, two reporters for the Los Angeles Times, Jeff Gottleib and Ruben Vives, recently broke a big story on the outrageous salaries earned by the city manager and council members in the small working-class city of Bell in southeastern L.A. county. Without the hard work of two intrepid reporters backed by the resources of a major newspaper, this story would have remained buried.
To my namesake, hang in there, brother. (Or cousin….)
John Conroy
Los Angeles
#5 Posted by John Conroy, CJR on Wed 21 Jul 2010 at 01:58 PM
Along with John, we owe a great debt to many of the free weeklies around the country for being the last true Journalists left. I read many of them and they almost always feature stories that should be front page news but are rarely even mentioned.
I remember in the Miami New Times a story from about 2000 during the G-8 summit detailing Blackwater and Delta force type thugs dressed up as anarchists and disrupting the protests there in a well coordinated military campaign on American soil. Pictures, interviews, everything. I thought it would at last force the MSM to tell the truth, but nothing, not one word in the Miami Herald, TV or magazines.
Johns story was one of the few that made the mainstream and only because of his persistence. Eat your Lentil soup with pride my friend.
#6 Posted by NortonSmitty, CJR on Mon 16 Aug 2010 at 05:08 PM
I read John Conroy's Belfast Diary; it's one of the classic books from the 30-year war in North Ireland. Over the years, I've recommended it to many and often wondered where he ended up. Now I know, this is a wonderful piece. Good for him and good for CJR.
#7 Posted by Mairtin O Muilleoir, Belfast, CJR on Sat 11 Sep 2010 at 10:32 AM
I would not think it extravagant for Aaron Patterson to offer a man that helped saved their lives to offer Mr Conroy a 5-10% share of their damages as a thank you. Even actor's agents get 10%. I know they are not obligated, but if I were unjustly sentenced to death and his work saved my life, I would be thankful.
#8 Posted by max berry, CJR on Fri 1 Oct 2010 at 12:26 PM