Conroy was often one of the few, if not the only, reporters in the courtroom. The proceedings ended in a mistrial, followed a short time later by a second weeks-long trial, in which Wilson won a mixed verdict. The jury found that his constitutional rights had been violated and that the city had a de facto policy of allowing police to abuse people suspected of killing police officers. But the jury also found that Wilson had not been subjected to excessive force as a result of that policy. (Wilson appealed and won a third civil suit in 1996. The city was ordered to pay $100,000 to the family of Officer Fahey, which had filed a wrongful death suit against Wilson, and another $900,000 to Wilson’s attorneys. Wilson did not receive a dime and died in prison of natural causes in 2007, about three weeks before Conroy was laid off.)
Conroy sat through the first two trials but did not publish a single word until the final verdict was in. His story in the Reader hit the street on January 25, 1990. The headline was, “House of Screams, Torture by Electroshock: Could it happen in a Chicago police station? Did it happen at Area 2?’’ He thought his work was done. Now the downtown dailies would jump all over the story and the house of screams would come tumbling down. “John really was kind of waiting around for the lid to blow off and nothing happened,’’ says Mike Lenehan, his former editor and still a close friend. “He was disillusioned. John has this strong streak of Irish Catholic to him. He’s just as upright as a guy can be.’’
If the press didn’t immediately see the import of Conroy’s story, the inmate population in Illinois certainly did. Soon, Burge and his detectives were facing dozens of accusations of torture. In 1993, after an internal police department investigation and as the accusations against him continued to pour in, the city’s Police Board fired Burge. He was never charged with a crime, though, and a number of men remained in prison, some on death row, as a result of the confessions they gave inside the interrogation room at Area 2. Conroy stayed on the story.
In 1996, the Reader published his second long article on the case, “Town Without Pity, Police Torture: The courts know about it, the media know about it, and chances are you know about it. So why aren’t we doing anything about it?’’ Michael Miner, a Reader editor who writes a popular media column for the paper, edited most of the seventeen stories Conroy wrote about police torture. They often worked at Conroy’s kitchen table in suburban Chicago, poring over documents and eating homemade scones.
The men knew they were treading in sensitive political territory. Every fact or assertion was double- and triple-checked. “John’s a fastidious guy,’’ Miner says. “He holds himself to a higher standard than anyone I know. He was extremely cautious in what he reported.’’ They also knew they had “a terrific’’ story on their hands. “It seemed to be our franchise,’’ Miner says. “One story suggested another. It was just a bottomless well of material.’’
One day in early December 2007, Miner was in the Reader office just north of the Loop when Alison True, the editor, said she wanted to talk to him. True has been the Reader’s editor since 1994. She proudly had given Conroy the time and the space to tell his incredible stories. Some of them ran close to 12,000 words. What True wanted to talk to Miner about was layoffs. It broke her heart, she told Miner, but Conroy and three other feature writers had to be let go. The paper, its editorial budget cut nearly in half, could no longer afford what Conroy did best. “The investigative reporters who remain on staff,’’ she says, “are the ones who are in the paper every week.’’

I was/am (not sure really) an aspiring Chicago-area journalist who's interned at the Reader, among other places. When I was deciding whether to pursue the field before graduating last year, I talked to many journalists I admire, all of whom 1) responded to my emails, which was something of a surprise 2) said "no" with varying degrees of emphasis.
I emailed John Conroy, too.
His "no" was the most emphatic. "If you can do anything else, anything at all," he said. "Do it."
Well, I couldn't find a job in journalism--got beat out for an entry-level beat reporting job in rural IL by a laid-off Sun-Times reporter in one case--so I took my liberal arts degree and Did Something Else. It's going well and I really like my job, and I'm still writing for the public good. Conroy's "no" was one of the most disheartening, though. I had hoped that maybe his prospects had picked up since then, but it doesn't seem like it. Thanks for a great piece.
#1 Posted by KB, CJR on Fri 16 Jul 2010 at 02:28 PM
Thanks for sharing this account of John Conroy's predicament. About 10 years ago, I spent a summer in Chicago for the Academy for Alternative Journalism, a program I think was co-sponsored by the Chicago Reader and Medill. John came to speak to our class about public records and research techniques. Since I was introduced to his work, I regard it as the standard to which I always aspire. Besides all the individuals he has helped through his stories, the voiceless for whom he has brought justice, I hope that John also knows that there are journalists and writers out there who are inspired by his lifelong commitment to the fundamental purpose of journalism--to reveal the truth, to tell meaningful stories that make a difference. I know I appreciate the example he has set. I appreciate the life he has chosen and the sacrifices that have come with it. I appreciate his diligence and his persistence, and on some level I hope that he believes it was worth it. Because it was.
#2 Posted by C. Lo, CJR on Fri 16 Jul 2010 at 03:37 PM
Alllowing seasoned investigative reporters like John Conroy to languish is a mortal sin. A sin this society will pay for in years to come. I know of too many good reporters who have been 'laid off' for any number of reasons - mostly because the bosses can be replace them with younger and cheaper writers - with no history or understanding of the elements that can compound a story. His experience is a gift and one that ANY self-respecting news outlet should welcome - Especially in Chicago. Step up to the plate all you publishers and editors in chief -- HIRE THIS MAN !
#3 Posted by Maureen McFadden, CJR on Fri 16 Jul 2010 at 09:49 PM
Conroy was recently interviewed by Bob Garfield for NPR's On the Media. It's worth checking out if his story moves you. And it should.
#4 Posted by Justin, CJR on Sun 18 Jul 2010 at 07:40 AM
I was visiting Chicago about a week ago when I saw the Reader story about Burge’s case with John’s last name in the hed. John and I share a name, a profession, the same struggles, and almost the same ages. I have followed his career since I first saw John’s name printed in a Northern California newspaper listing for a speaking tour he was conducting back in the early ‘80s, I believe. Having spent time in the north of Ireland myself and written about the Troubles for publications such as the Los Angeles Reader and Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, I have long admired John’s work.
Andrea D. Lyon, the defense attorney quoted in the CJR story, is correct. John is an unsung hero, and it’s a cliché now to point out that corruption, torture, and malfeasance will go unchecked because journalists of John’s caliber are now longer on the case. Here in Southern California, two reporters for the Los Angeles Times, Jeff Gottleib and Ruben Vives, recently broke a big story on the outrageous salaries earned by the city manager and council members in the small working-class city of Bell in southeastern L.A. county. Without the hard work of two intrepid reporters backed by the resources of a major newspaper, this story would have remained buried.
To my namesake, hang in there, brother. (Or cousin….)
John Conroy
Los Angeles
#5 Posted by John Conroy, CJR on Wed 21 Jul 2010 at 01:58 PM
Along with John, we owe a great debt to many of the free weeklies around the country for being the last true Journalists left. I read many of them and they almost always feature stories that should be front page news but are rarely even mentioned.
I remember in the Miami New Times a story from about 2000 during the G-8 summit detailing Blackwater and Delta force type thugs dressed up as anarchists and disrupting the protests there in a well coordinated military campaign on American soil. Pictures, interviews, everything. I thought it would at last force the MSM to tell the truth, but nothing, not one word in the Miami Herald, TV or magazines.
Johns story was one of the few that made the mainstream and only because of his persistence. Eat your Lentil soup with pride my friend.
#6 Posted by NortonSmitty, CJR on Mon 16 Aug 2010 at 05:08 PM
I read John Conroy's Belfast Diary; it's one of the classic books from the 30-year war in North Ireland. Over the years, I've recommended it to many and often wondered where he ended up. Now I know, this is a wonderful piece. Good for him and good for CJR.
#7 Posted by Mairtin O Muilleoir, Belfast, CJR on Sat 11 Sep 2010 at 10:32 AM
I would not think it extravagant for Aaron Patterson to offer a man that helped saved their lives to offer Mr Conroy a 5-10% share of their damages as a thank you. Even actor's agents get 10%. I know they are not obligated, but if I were unjustly sentenced to death and his work saved my life, I would be thankful.
#8 Posted by max berry, CJR on Fri 1 Oct 2010 at 12:26 PM