On See It Now, Murrow gave the audience what Rather likes to call “added value”—his high standard for depth and originality. But Murrow was, more essentially, a television pioneer, and a central attraction of Rather’s show is seeing a former stalwart of the establishment, a millionaire and an icon of a decidedly different era, recast in similar terms, on HDNet, a boutique cable channel and with a fraction of his former audience (HDNet has around ten million subscribers, but won’t release numbers for how many watch Reports; when Rather left the anchor chair at CBS Evening News, he had nearly eight million viewers nightly). Playing Rather’s William Paley in this improbable sequel is Mark Cuban, the billionaire Internet entrepreneur who co-founded HDNet hoping to cash in on the high-definition technology craze, and who, in the summer of 2006, plucked Rather from the purgatorial aftermath of his 60 Minutes II report on Bush, offering him carte blanche to develop an investigative news show that would function as a counterpoint to the superficial inclinations of network news. While the analogy isn’t perfect, the show is, surely, a throwback. Many of the twenty-five staff members are exiles from big media companies, happily untethered from the burden of ratings, and the productions have an anachronistic bent: long, sober, and largely advertisement-free documentaries thoroughly devoid of excessive sentiment and the “gets” and “money shots” of prime-time TV. “Cuban deserves a lot of credit. I had my doubts,” Rather told me. “But the only thing he ever said to me was, ‘Have guts and do excellent work.’ ” The effect, Rather claims, has been rejuvenating. “This is sheer joy for me. I’ve never been happier or more satisfied. One reason I’m talking to you is to spread the word.”
It was interesting, given the degree of animus surrounding Rather, to hear him talk about happiness and satisfaction, neither of which has ever been considered indispensable to the Rather brand. One reason I was talking to him was that there was something intriguing about the notion of Dan Rather at peace, even though I had never fully bought the various simplistic characterizations that he had been saddled with over the years, from “bizarro Rather” to “liberal Rather” to “folksy, sentimental Rather.” He dodges most questions that attempt to get at his place in history, but Wayne Nelson, his executive producer on Reports, told me that Rather is “enjoying life for the first time,” and I thought maybe he’d open up and talk candidly about his departure from CBS, and about his most dramatic career moments, many of which are among his most contentious. I wanted to reconcile all the ideas that people have about him with the ideas that he has about himself. I also thought that sooner or later he might revert to form. In June, he’d indicated the possibility of getting exclusive interviews with the presidential candidates for what he called “a sit down, not a debate—a talk about things not normally talked about, like crumbling national infrastructure and schools.” Given his notorious run-ins with politicians—he once publicly mocked President Nixon at a press conference in Houston during the Watergate crisis, and later sparred with vice president George H. W. Bush during an interview about the Iran-Contra scandal—I wondered what might happen if he sat with, say, John McCain, and dug into the senator’s positions on the war in Iraq.

yes, lets hope Dan tracks down the famous fugitive that gave him the phony documents, and lets hope there are still naive pups like this fool that will ignore the obvious - RATHER IS A JOKE - in public, in private, to all, but the MOST WISHFUL LEFITES which this writer is a charter member of the club.
gene wiley
Posted by gene wiley on Wed 10 Dec 2008 at 09:08 AM
Dec. 10, 2008
Interesting story about Rather - but somewhat old hat. No real new ground here.
Rather wants to know what Murrow would have done. Why? No one can possibly know what someone else would do or have done under similar circumstances. Any way, why burden oneslf with something like that.
Ed Murrow was a great journalist, and considered important enough in his day to be asked to the White House to dinner. Journalists just don't get that kind of treatment any more.
They are seen as, and generally wish to be watchdogs. If journalists are not opponents, they are also not chums or cheerleaders of government and politicians. It's the adversary nature of journalism and politics that tends to govern journalism's relationship to society at large.
Posted by Paul Kellogg on Wed 10 Dec 2008 at 11:27 AM
I heard Rather speak at Boston University recently.
His biggest problem is that he can't get out of Dan Rather's way.
Posted by Annie on Wed 10 Dec 2008 at 06:09 PM
Maybe if Dan Rather was writing for CJR his story and his workmanlike history as an reporter and anchor would be more respected. TV expectations are fairly low nowadays and many are true believers in the government's side of things. A problem. And, oh, yes, the smugness of the above comments illustrates this problem.
Pugnacity is good in investigative journalism, perhaps not in and of itself but certainly in the company of journalistic skills and mastery of strategy. Perhaps Dan needs to work on that a little more if he wants to stay on TV. But, wherever you go, Dan, I'll be watching, listening, or reading.
Posted by Stuart Fischoff on Wed 10 Dec 2008 at 06:33 PM