
About two years ago, I took a position as a freelance correspondent for Reuters in the West African nation of Sierra Leone. As I am now preparing to leave, I think there is value in laying out the practical aspects of operating as a journalist in one of the world’s poorest countries. Sierra Leone emerged from a bloody civil war in 2002; six years later, it still held the last place among 179 countries in the UN’s human development index. By 2011, it had risen off the bottom but was still ranked 180 out of 187. Gross income per capita remained just $340 per year.
In Britain, my home country, Sierra Leone is still widely considered a conflict zone. Tony Blair deployed British troops there in 2000, searing the civil war onto the British consciousness. Today, though, Sierra Leone is astonishingly safe. That is not to say it is absolutely safe; one night, men cut their way into my house in Freetown, the capital, with bolt cutters, and I awoke with them in my bedroom. They made off with a haul of electronics and dropped a knife on the way out. However, such instances are rare. Risk is largely confined to the country’s lethal roads and the what-if scenarios created by the lack of medical resources.
Instead of risk, the reporter in Sierra Leone faces difficulty. For me, Freetown life largely pares down to a continual quest for three commodities: electrical energy, functional telecommunications, and cash.
First, electricity: Sierra Leone has extremely limited grid power. Voltage spikes can blow up irreplaceable laptop chargers, unless bulky anti-surge protectors are used. And with grid power so scarce, you rely on diesel generators, which are prohibitively expensive to run all day.
Second, communications: When I arrived in Sierra Leone the country was one of a dwindling band of nations still lacking fiber-optic connections to the outside world (Chad and Eritrea were others). It was not unusual to spend half an hour trying to send an email. A year later, cable made landfall on Lumley Beach in western Freetown, but more than a year after that, the cable has yet to come online. The consequence is that data communications—required to digitally file copy—are horrifyingly slow.
So my initial months in Freetown were dominated by a perambulation around the few establishments in the city—hotels, mainly—that maintained generator power all day and had Internet connections. After almost a year, I persuaded my masters that this situation was unsustainable. In response, they gave me a satellite phone. For a giddy month, I worked on my veranda, my BGAN Explorer 300 pointed at the eastern sky like theological apparatus used in the veneration of a pre-Christian god. Then the bill came, north of $2000. Reuters promptly decided that the BGAN was only for emergencies. The company instead let me rent a desk in an office—with power and Internet, albeit a temperamental connection.
The office could not solve the third Freetown scarcity, cash. Sierra Leone’s currency, the “leone,” retails at around 4,400 to the dollar. The highest denomination note remains the 10,000. Such devaluation renders the wallet ineffectual for the carriage of serious wealth (you can carry $30 worth, not $300). For substantial sums, I favor instead the black plastic bag.
The bigger problem is not the bulk of the currency but the difficulties in obtaining it. You can pay for almost nothing with a credit card in Sierra Leone; all transactions are cash. I befriended Titus, the operator of the Visa cash-advance machine in Ecobank’s Freetown branch. Titus is a good man. But his contraption, like all electromechanical devices in Sierra Leone, is routinely broken. (And now Ecobank has abandoned the service altogether.) And so, all too often, I reverted to Freetown’s semi-functional fleet of ATMs, constantly jamming themselves on wads of near-worthless paper. You can spend hours traversing the capital, searching for a working ATM to get money to buy supper.

Your piece made me think of brief times I have spent in Uganda with students -- though certainly Kampala is very developed. The struggles to do the most simple of tasks can be mind-boggling and eye-opening. Thanks for writing it and for covering Sierre Leone.
#1 Posted by Carol Zuegner, CJR on Fri 4 Jan 2013 at 12:14 PM
Simon Akan is an enemy of Sierra Leone. You have never reported anything positive about Sierra Leone because SLPP is not the one in power. The country of Sierra Leone will never forgive for tarnishing her image. The memories of your bias reporting will ever remain to hunt you all the days of your life on planet earth.
#2 Posted by Amadu Bangura, CJR on Mon 7 Jan 2013 at 01:57 AM
Well said Amadu Bangura. I have read a lot lot of articles written by this so-called journalist and he has always written negative and biased articles about our beloved country. Good riddance to him. The likes of him have nothing good to say about Africa but yet the countries where they come from is not perfect either. Why not write about the homeless people sleeping on the streets in London and also those who are living in abject poverty in the western world. That will make good reading for his audience. Sierra Leone is a better place without people like Simon Akran. So Good riddance.
#3 Posted by Isha Sesay, CJR on Mon 7 Jan 2013 at 02:37 PM
Simon Akam would have transformed himself into a hero had he only been in step with the type of journalism practiced by the likes of Sylvia Olanyinka Blyden, our fearless and most Independent journalist in Sierraleone. I am sick of the hyprocricy and sycophancy that has become a trade mark of many of our fellow citizens. I have visited Sierraleone on numerous ocassion and can relate to a lot the the struggles noted in Mr. Akam's article. To say that he is tarnishing the good image of our country is not only far from the truth, but an attempt to ignore the stark realities of the situation our people face on a daily basis. I guess it would have been ok with his critics if he had recommended that we no longer need malaria treatment before visiting Sierraleone.
#4 Posted by Noorudin KaiKai, CJR on Tue 8 Jan 2013 at 01:37 PM
The Foreign & commonwealth offices in th UK had this in it's travel advice to Sierra Leone:
"Transport infrastructure is poor. None of the options for transferring between the international airport at Lungi and Freewtown is risk-free. Water shortages are frequent. Networked power is rare. Rental accommodations and hotels rely on generators and imported fuel supply.There are ferw healthcare facilities in SL and medical care is poor." I guess the UK, the biggest donor to SL who ended the civil war dislike the country. Stupid!
Read the US advice, same difference.
#5 Posted by Baldwin, CJR on Tue 8 Jan 2013 at 05:43 PM
It's disappointing when prestigious websites like this allow journalists like Simon to misrepresent places they go to. If i were sierra Leone i would sue him for defamation!
#6 Posted by sulakshana gupta, CJR on Wed 9 Jan 2013 at 10:12 AM
I also live in Freetown. My experience is very different.
I cannot turn a corner without someone offering to change USD into Leones (the local currency), they even come to my office if I text them. I also get 3g internet on my mobile, sending emails couldn't be easier.
Perhaps Simon was living in a different Freetown. I find it relaxing and fun. I do sometimes put my feet in cold water of an evening but wouldn't write a two page article about it.
I would have preferred to read about all the positive things that Simon learnt during his time here. Perhaps he enjoyed the ability to get your favourite shirt copied at a tailor for $4 or the benefits of having a lady selling delicious fresh fruit calling round your house every day - neither of which I seem to get back home in the UK. That we be a more intersting article to me rather than another one reminding me that in very poor countries the power is not reliable!
#7 Posted by Living in SL, CJR on Thu 10 Jan 2013 at 09:16 AM
Totally agree with "living in SL". Simon has shown a very unbalanced and negative view of SL. Why not write about the amazing beaches, the $10 fresh lobster, the stunning geography (the only place in west Africa where the mountains meet the sea), or the wonderful and friendly locals?
This is a typical example of lazy western journalists looking to talk up how bad Africa is and ignoring the reality. Yes Sierra Leone has problems, like every country in the world but the ones Simon mentions are so minor as to make it incredible that anyone would print his list of moans. If he thinks unreliable electricity and poor internet are such a big deal I suggest he looks for a job in the home counties for a local rag
#8 Posted by Jonathan L-H, CJR on Fri 11 Jan 2013 at 01:01 PM
While I don't disagree with the kind of stories "Jonathan L- H" and "Living in SL" would like to see, I don't believe anyone should venerate Simon for the type of story he wrote. It's his experience and the truth. As a Sierra Leone in the diaspora it hurts to hear what Simon wrote about, but its the truth which is all I want to read about on my homeland. Not some "good" story that's written with lies or what Simon correctly calls "sycophantic discourse".
#9 Posted by Murray Town Boy, CJR on Fri 1 Feb 2013 at 08:45 PM