The Internet has eliminated geography as a measurement of what kind of news you receive. News from Moscow can come to you in an instant. News from down the street can come to you in an instant. The question is, Who will collect it and how will it be delivered? The “local, local, local” I would emphasize would not be focused on stories occurring within a 200-mile radius of Tribune Tower. Instead, “local” would mean your ad market, your news market, your challenge, which is Chicago, Cook County, Illinois, and the Midwest. Provide the people who live there and the businesses operating there with the news coverage they need. Don’t leave an opening for a national or international newspaper or website to become a necessary “second read,” to supplement incomplete Tribune coverage, because then they also become a necessary “second advertising venue,” hurting your business. You can make this work by reasserting Tribune’s place as the gold standard for news.
Most of all, you have to learn how to win again.
You should own news in Chicago, no matter what development it covers.
This will take a commitment to be so connected to the strengths of technology and what it can do for news that Tribune becomes a test bed for innovation and product creation. Your news websites should be constantly evolving creatures, full of interactivity, video, and the certainty that if something happens, it will show up on one of your websites first.
Where will the revenue come from? It is by no means clear that the sale of Tribune’s assets will add money to the news pot. There are creditors lined up from Chicago to the moon waiting to get cash once the company emerges from bankruptcy. It will take a powerful vision and strong execution to become a news leader given that reality.
Think of your company as a great vertical machine. News is poured in the top by aggressive staffs on all your media platforms and then tailored for customers on each level as it moves toward the ground floor. In the process, it goes everywhere and it carries your brand.
Don’t make the mistake of thinking there is a single source solution to the challenge you face. People are not yet born with iPads. Your news customers live in a variety of worlds easy to reach with old and new technology. That being the case, make certain you are on the cutting edge, even as you pay close attention to existing customers.
What you are telling them is more important than how you reach them.
Don’t make the mistake of asking the question, “What do people want?” at your level. The answer is “Everything.” There are two more important questions:
“What is news?” and “How do I become the dominant source of that news?”
First, embrace perhaps the biggest change in the news landscape of them all. “News” used to be whatever You said it was. Now “News” is whatever the People say it is.
The “Gaza versus Gaga” argument is another false either/or that you should reject. Editors need to be smart about both Middle East news and pop culture sensations. You have to create news products that recognize that fashion, music, art, culture, food—an array of subjects that were once thought of as “features”—are now actually news to the people who want to know about them.
To be the dominant source of that news, you have to put it where people want to find it: newspapers for people who want their news that way. Internet for people who want it that way. Television for people who want it that way. Radio for people who want it that way. Each option presents a great array of revenue potentials, but only as long as you send the message to everyone in Chicago that Tribune is the place for news again.
Sincerely,
Charles M. Madigan

One small not:. In my understanding, Sam Zell did not "cobble together$12 billion" to leverage his purchase of Tribune; he borrowed $12 billion from employees' retirement funds in an ESOP arrangement. If I am wrong on this, please correct me.
#1 Posted by abg, CJR on Tue 11 Jan 2011 at 03:19 PM
I believe in the late 80s and early 90s the Tribune stock hovered at $100/share. Not bad for legit work. The call letters of WGN stood for something. All assets and entities that developed derived from the broadsheet. That's amazing! The news is the people and the people make the news.
If there is a ozone-burning spotlight or multiple ones, i.e. one for the Middle East and one for Lady Gaga, no one has addressed that issue separately or correctly.
It would be a great thing to select a "natural fit" for the next Tribune CEO/Chairman: someone who is focused on operations and finance but would want to continue to advance media while keeping it a clean and honest business.
Unfortunately the recent past reveals a slow torture on the emotions.
The Tribune is on the verge of a transformation. It is capable of improving the city of Chicago greatly or just reporting on Chicago's man-made financial disintegration.
#2 Posted by Anonymous, CJR on Wed 12 Jan 2011 at 11:09 AM
The only worse than current management is former management. I used to buy and use equipment for a Tribune-owned TV station in California. I could find some pretty nice, user-friendly, lower-cost gear, but was overridden on major purchases by corporate's Chief Engineer in a tower in Chicago.
We spent thousands on terrible equipment, and the training and overtime to try to work with it. That Chief Engineer hadn't edited videotape in years, but was somehow more qualified to make major decisions than I, an actual manager/user was.
#3 Posted by Former Employee 1, CJR on Wed 12 Jan 2011 at 11:26 AM
Mr. Madigan is right on. Local newspapers need to be owned locally and their mission should be to earn the role as the dominant source of news for that region. It breaks my heart when I read a sports story in the LA Times written by someone in Chicago. Bring it back home.
#4 Posted by Shelly Schraff - former LA Times ad sales exec, CJR on Wed 12 Jan 2011 at 05:40 PM
In light of recent events, it appears as if Charles Madigan has either been used or is making sarcastic commentary.
#5 Posted by Anonymous, CJR on Fri 21 Jan 2011 at 04:25 PM