We’ve all seen it and cringed: The sign advertising “Antique’s for Sale,” the one in the supermarket boasting about it’s “fresh cucumber’s,” or the sign on the neighbor’s house saying “Welcome to the Smith’s.” Few among us (or so we hope) don’t know that those are wrong.
Yet its showing up everywhere, even in “edited” copy. Can anyone explain it? Perhaps there’s a bad grammar textbook somewhere, or one teacher incorrectly taught thirty students, who taught thirty more …
The phenomenon is sometimes called “the grocer’s apostrophe,” because it seems most prevalent at the grocery store, though it’s spreading faster than the swine flu. The disease seems to particularly affect words ending in vowels. Nonetheless, lets try to stamp this out. Tell a friend, and ask that friend to tell a friend: Apostrophe’s are not used to form plurals.
Except, of course, when they are.
Yes, there are a few rare cases when an apostrophe is used to form plurals. For example, an apostrophe is needed in the plural of a single letter or number, as in “mind your p’s and q’s” or “digital binary code uses only 0’s and 1’s.” Without the apostrophe, it would be almost impossible to read “ps and qs“ or “0s and 1s.” The plurals of acronyms and initialisms sometimes take apostrophes (as in CD’s), but that use varies by style. And, again depending on style, apostrophes may be used to form plurals of numbers (her salary was in the low 100’s), or so-called “words as word’s” expressions (there can be no if’s, and’s, or but’s about it).
Apostrophes are primarily used to indicate possession (Sharon’s book) or to indicate omission, as in a contraction, where the apostrophe replaces letters (I can’t ever remember the difference between its and it’s). Apostrophes may also be used, depending on style, to indicate the contraction of a number: “2009” becomes “’09.” In fact, since the possessive apostrophe is really replacing the word “of” (the book of Sharon), you’ll rarely go wrong if you remember that an apostrophe almost always indicates that something has been dropped.
If you remember that last sentence, you’ll also never have the “it’s/its” problem, which is also endemic. If you can’t replace “it’s” with “it is,” your “it’s” is a possessive personal pronoun and should be “its.” And that’s probably the crux of much apostrophe confusion, since possessive personal pronouns—mine, yours, his, hers, theirs—are just about the only possessives that don’t take apostrophes.
One more little apostrophic quirk: Because the possessive apostrophe effectively replaces “of,” you need one in such phrases as “I could use two weeks’ rest” (two weeks of rest) or “he was sentenced to twenty years’ imprisonment” (twenty years of imprisonment). But you’d never say “she’s six months of pregnant,” so you don’t want an apostrophe in the phrase “she’s six months pregnant.”
Now that you know it all, how many apostrophe errors did you spot in this column?*
* There are five intentional apostrophe errors, not counting the examples of erroneous use. (Write languagecorner@cjr.org if you need a key.) If you counted “grocer’s apostrophe,” make it six, because you’re assuming “grocers” is an adjective, not a noun, the way “teachers union” doesn’t need an apostrophe—but that’s another column.





You used it's in the first paragraph and it should have been its.
Posted by Terry on Mon 10 Aug 2009 at 03:46 PM
Don't forget proper names! I'm always cringing at mail addressed to, e.g., "The Smith's" or "The Thompson's." And you see that kind of error all the time on professionally printed signs and "personalized" products like welcome mats.
Posted by Mollie on Mon 10 Aug 2009 at 05:52 PM
MErrill, great post. Do you think the development of the Internet and emails has led to more writing and spelling mistakes, or less? And should internet be Capped or lowercased? we don't say Radio or Television, but why do we write Internet, the Brits write it as internet. who is right? and WHY is an apostrophe CALLED an apostrophe, what does that word MEAN? AND LAST QUESTUON: are you screening this on a screen or reading this on paper? is there a difference?
Posted by danny bloom on Tue 11 Aug 2009 at 11:46 PM
According to the OED, the word comes ultimately from Greek ἡ ἀπόστροφος [προσῳδία] (hē apóstrophos [prosōidía], "[the accent of] 'turning away', or elision"), through Latin and French.[1]
Posted by danny bloom on Tue 11 Aug 2009 at 11:57 PM
Smart Quotes
To make typographic apostrophes easier to enter, wordprocessing and publishing software often converts typewriter apostrophes to typographic apostrophes during text entry (at the same time converting opening and closing single and double quotes to their correct left-handed or right-handed forms). A similar facility may be offered on web servers after submitting text in a form field, e.g. on weblogs or free encyclopedias. This is known as the smart quotes feature; apostrophes and quotation marks that are not automatically altered by computer programs are known as dumb quotes.
Such conversion is not always done in accordance with the standards for character sets and encodings. Additionally, many such software programs incorrectly convert a leading apostrophe to an opening quotation mark (e.g., in abbreviations of years: ‘29 rather than the correct ’29 for the year 2029; or ‘twas instead of ’twas as the archaic abbreviation of it was. A quick way to get the correct result in Microsoft Word is to type two apostrophes (sometimes using a space as well, as required), and then delete the first. Smart quote features also often fail to recognise situations when a prime rather than an apostrophe is needed; for example, incorrectly rendering the latitude 49° 53′ 08″ as 49° 53’ 08”.
In Microsoft Word it is possible to turn smart quotes off (in some versions, by navigating through Tools, AutoCorrect, AutoFormat as you type, and then checking the appropriate option). Alternatively, typing CONTROL-Z (for Undo) immediately after entering the apostrophe will convert it back to a straight apostrophe.
[edit] Typewriter apostrophe and ASCII encoding
The typewriter apostrophe ( ' ) was inherited by computer keyboards, and is the only apostrophe character available in the (7-bit) ASCII character encoding, which is the original basis for the computer representation of the Latin alphabet.
As such, it is a highly overloaded character. In ASCII, it represents a right single quotation mark, left single quotation mark, apostrophe, vertical line or prime (punctuation marks), or an apostrophe modifier or acute accent (modifier letters). (The separate ASCII grave accent ( ` ), intended as a modifier and assigned its own key on many keyboards, has sometimes found a non-standard role as a single opening quote.)
Posted by danny bloom on Tue 11 Aug 2009 at 11:58 PM
’ or '
Posted by danny bloom on Wed 12 Aug 2009 at 12:00 AM
By your metric, "teachers union" requires an apostrophe. It's shortened version of "a union of teachers".
Posted by Graeme on Thu 13 Aug 2009 at 10:16 PM
Once upon a time grammar was taught in primary school and publishers employed proof-readers and editors. Nowadays grammar has been edged-out of the curriculum by technology, and publishers, more worried about their bottom-line than quality, have been cutting all the checks an balances. Not to mention the pressure to get the news up on the internet as fast as possible.
Posted by MargB on Thu 13 Aug 2009 at 10:22 PM
Graeme: It's annoyingly subtle, but that's a different sense of "of". The "of" that is replaced by the apostrophe in "Grocer's apostrophe" (if you were to use one) is in the sense of "belonging to" (the possessive), whereas the "of" in your "a Union of Teachers" means "made up of". Similarly, "Writers Festival" should not have an apostrophe (although they sometimes do), because it is not "the Festival that belongs to Writers", but "a Festival comprising Writers".
Posted by Daniel on Fri 14 Aug 2009 at 04:26 AM
Thank you, Daniel. (For saving me from having to write THAT column.) It's one of (the many) annoyingly subtle things that seem to have gone missing from grammar education. -- merrill
Posted by Merrill Perlman on Fri 14 Aug 2009 at 06:37 PM
"MErrill, great post. Do you think the development of the Internet and emails has led to more writing and spelling mistakes, or less?"
Ah, but it should say fewer, not less!! Mistakes can be quantified, and therefore, the sentence should read: Do you think the development of the Internet and E-Mails has led to more writing and spelling mistakes, or fewer?
You don't call it an amount of mistakes, but a number of mistakes, right?
Posted by Katja on Sun 6 Sep 2009 at 05:03 PM
It's always risky to post corrections as a grammar pedant. One can often find usage mistakes by even solid writers, let alone typos and misspellings. (I fancy I may have made a few here.) Bryan Garner takes quiet glee in finding mistakes by Safire, Buckley, the New Yorker, Lynne Truss, etc. So my suggestion, if you feel compelled to do so, is to think carefully, check a few outside sources, then re-read your message before pointing out another's grammar mistakes.
Posted by Marco on Sun 15 Nov 2009 at 04:36 PM
In reference to "possessive personal pronouns—mine, yours, his, hers, theirs"
I once got into a tussle with a linguistics teacher over morphemes because she marked one of my answers wrong.
The assumption was that morphemes are units of meaning and that some units of meaning do not stand alone. Therefore we cannot use the term 'pre' by itself because it needs to refer to an object like 'history'. These morphemes are bound to the object and are thus called bound morphemes. 'History' can be by itself, so therefore it is a free morpheme.
So when I was asked whether 'my' was a bound morpheme or not, I said it was because you can't say "This is my."
Yes, it stands alone as a word, because we put spaces around it, but not as a unit of meaning. 'Mine' is the free morpheme version of the possessive.
And I got an X for my thoughtful answer.
This heart of mine did crack that day :'(
(It's okay to use the apostrophe as a emoticon's tear, no?)
Posted by Thimbles on Mon 16 Nov 2009 at 12:01 AM