What a delight it must be to be a columnist for a major American newspaper. When traveling to distant, war-torn lands, you can enlist America’s top generals to show you around. That’s what David Ignatius of The Washington Post did on Sunday. He was shown around Baghdad by no less a figure than Centcom commander David Petraeus. Or, rather, he was shown it from the air. The two flew over the city in a Black Hawk helicopter. The general pointed out all the signs of recovery below. “See, the houses are occupied again,” he said as they passed over a neighborhood that several years ago had been largely abandoned. He pointed to the schools, police stations, parks, markets, and a traffic jam, which, he said was “good to see.”
It was only after Petraeus and Ignatius landed in the Green Zone that they learned that, while they’d been aloft, two massive bombs had gone off in the heart of the city, killing more than 100 and wounding more than 500. “I guess that tells you something about the difference between life, close up, and what you see from several hundred feet,” Ignatius wrote in his column Monday (“A Resilient Baghdad on a Day of Horror”). Rather than try to examine that life up close, however, Ignatius repaired to the Al-Rashid Hotel in the Green Zone for lunch with two Iraqi friends. (Ignatius does not tell us who they are nor what their background is, but they’re clearly members of the elite.) Despite the bombings, Ignatius observes, his friends are “surprisingly upbeat about the future.” “In every sector, Iraq is coming back to its normal mode,” one says. “There is no way it will slip back,” the other insists.
As night falls, Ignatius joins Petraeus for another helicopter ride, to Camp Victory, near the airport. Though he had just warned us a few paragraphs earlier about the limits of the view from above, he draws more conclusions. “Baghdad can be a cruel place,” the general tells him, but “you have to keep a grip on your hopes.” And, Ignatius writes, “as the Black Hawk skimmed over the city, Baghdad seemed to be teeming again, despite the morning’s events.” “People are back out in the parks,” Petraeus observes, surveying the landscape. “All the lights are on, cars are driving around.”
The view from the ground is left to the Post’s Arabic-speaker Middle East expert, Anthony Shadid, whose report the same day captured the shattering and traumatizing effect the bombings had on local residents:
Sunday’s attack, cutting through snarled traffic during the morning rush hour, was the worst in Baghdad since 2007. With an attack Aug. 19 that killed about 100 people, insurgents have now wrecked an array of pillars of the state’s authority: the Foreign, Finance, Justice, and Municipalities and Public Works ministries, along with the Baghdad provincial headquarters, which are all gathered in a fortified swath of downtown….
The smell of diesel still mixed with the stench of burning flesh when Maliki visited the scene of the destruction Sunday. Cars idling in traffic had been turned into tombs, their passengers incinerated inside….
“Bodies were hurled into the air,” said Mohammed Fadhil, a 19-year-old bystander. “I saw women and children cut in half.” He looked down at a curb smeared with blood. “What’s the sin that those people committed? They are so innocent.” …
At the hospital’s overflow morgue, a frigid trailer, people looking for relatives inhaled deeply before stepping into the darkened facility to look at bodies and fragments of flesh laying on stretchers. Nearby, Saif Sattar, 30, sobbed while sitting on a slab of metal, rocking back and forth. His 37-year-old brother, Faris, was among those killed, he said.
Their father was killed in a recent bombing in Baghdad as well, he added.
“All Iraqis will die,” he said quietly.
The full extent of the devastation is graphically and gruesomely conveyed in the remarkable photo gallery accompanying Shadid’s article. It provides a stark contrast to Ignatius’s above-it-all account.
- 1
- 2
Note that Max Boot appears to have been on a similar itinerary, and was similarly detached from the bombing atrocity despite being in Baghdad when it happened.
http://www.commentarymagazine.com/blogs/index.php/boot/141832
#1 Posted by P O'Neill, CJR on Wed 28 Oct 2009 at 10:34 PM
How better to report the 'good news'?
#2 Posted by Strangely Enough, CJR on Thu 29 Oct 2009 at 12:50 PM
Bravo for this article!
Whatever Ignatius did in Iraq, it was not "journalism." It told us nothing we couldn't learn from other sources, and it misdescribed the situation because it represented that it was telling us about "the situation in Iraq," whereas what it really did was tell us about "what the US military leadership and several well-connected Iraqi acquaintances want to tell us about Iraq."
It is elitism in print.
#3 Posted by Dollared, CJR on Thu 29 Oct 2009 at 03:00 PM
Apparently having the facts isn't important when conducting a Journalism Review. Having personally been on the flight, which would have taken place whether Mr. Ignatius was with us or not, I can assure you that the bombings happened prior to our arrival in Iraq. Not during the subsequent helo overflight assessment.
With regard to his choice to have lunch in the Green Zone, you have to understand that he didn't have the ability to "enlist" anyone to motorcade him around town or the green zone, because that was not the intent of his trip, nor were the resources available.
To be unfairly critical of Mr. Ignatius' article, which was merely to offer additional perspective, seems to me to be purely self-serving and somewhat vindictive.
Tell us, what comfortable desk location are you "reviewing" from?
#4 Posted by LT McCormick, CJR on Thu 29 Oct 2009 at 03:21 PM
Lt. McCormick: In his column, David Ignatius writes, "Around the time the bombers struck, I was flying over the city in a Black Hawk helicopter with General David Petraeus." Perhaps he was using "around" loosely, but I hardly think you can charge me with not having the facts. As for his decision to have lunch in the Green Zone, I'm not questioning that--I'm questioning his readiness to offer such sweeping opinions about the state of the Iraqi mood without getting out of the Green Zone. The Washington Post's reporters based in Baghdad routinely travel around the city without a military escort. I know because I was in Baghdad last year, staying with a news bureau outside the Green Zone. I met with Post reporters and heard their accounts of what it was like to move about the city. It wasn't easy, but they did it, with security provided by the bureau. I did that, too, to the best of my ability. That, I think, is a much more reliable way of sampling the mood in the country than embedding with the military--especially if one does that embedding in a helicopter. How much do you think you can see from a Black Hawk, lieutenant? But maybe that wasn't the intent of the trip. If so, I'd like to know what was.
And thanks to P O'Neill for providing that Max Boot clip. It helps drive home the point.
#5 Posted by Michael Massing, CJR on Thu 29 Oct 2009 at 04:50 PM
LT McCormick, can you tell us if you are responding as a citizen, or are you patrolling the internets looking for inaccuracies in a public affairs function?
We need to understand General Petraeus' resource deployment model. How much "helo overflight assessment" resources, and how much patrolling of the internets to insult professional journalists as "desk jockeys", is required to stabilize the Afghan situation so we can leave and resume devoting our national resources to our national needs?
#6 Posted by Dollared, CJR on Fri 30 Oct 2009 at 12:02 PM
Thank you for your comment, Dollared. On reflection, I, too, have found it very odd to receive such a comment from a military officer.
#7 Posted by Michael Massing, CJR on Fri 30 Oct 2009 at 04:10 PM
LT McCormick, are you a public affairs officer, or some other sort of info war operative?
#8 Posted by Jeff Huber, CJR on Sat 31 Oct 2009 at 03:01 PM
Excellent, disturbing piece. It's upsetting that after all these years of war in both Iraq and Afghanistan, the view from the helicopter still enjoys prestige in top media.
#9 Posted by Todd Gitlin, CJR on Sun 1 Nov 2009 at 08:55 AM
And to think back in J-School helicopter journalism used to refer to Africa.
#10 Posted by Mark York, CJR on Sun 1 Nov 2009 at 10:37 PM
The view from the helicopter expresses the view from "comfort", the truths we are comfortable with, the ones that will not fill us with remorse, anxiety or self doubt. The truths that are disturbing are always stemming from the dirty ground not the blissful sky.The area on the ground that contradicts everything the areal vision glorified.
#11 Posted by sailorgirl, CJR on Tue 10 Nov 2009 at 12:36 AM