In the early hours of New Year’s Day in 2009, a young man named Oscar Grant boarded a BART train bound for Oakland. He was 22, traveling with a few friends and his girlfriend. They had spent the night watching the fireworks in San Francisco.
What comes next is documented in the terrible cellphone videos that circulated in the days immediately after: The BART police arrived and dragged Grant’s crew off the train (there had been a report of black men fighting); Grant sat quietly before being pushed face down and restrained by a knee on his neck; Grant was essentially executed in front of the early morning revelers, hit by single shot fired from the gun of officer Johannes Mehserle, who said he was acting in self defense. Grant had been reaching for a weapon, Mehserle said (Grant had none), and he had been reaching for his Taser.
Since the last week’s release of Fruitvale Station, a movie documenting Grant’s last day and recreating his horrifying death, the press has been drawing the inevitable comparisons to the tragedy of Trayvon Martin. (Filmmakers are counting on such comparisons as part of their marketing campaign.) Though Grant—22 years old, a father, with several drug-related arrests—paints a different picture than the scrawny, 17-year-old football player, the two cases hit at a similar cultural scandal: Both were killed by white men who assumed criminality when faced with a young, black male.
But there’s another big difference between the two cases: If you weren’t living in the Bay Area in 2009, you probably haven’t heard of Grant. Though local publications covered the case and subsequent trial in painstaking detail, Grant’s story never broke into national headlines. The New York Times printed 291 articles and hundreds of blog posts on Trayvon Martin, plastering the front pages during accused shooter George Zimmerman’s trial. The Gray Lady published only a handful of articles on Grant’s death, which ran mostly in the Bay Area pages and focused on the violent Oakland riots that followed the shooting. The New Yorker has written 49 posts that comprise some of the most salient coverage of Martin’s case, including a particularly poignant hoodie tribute, whereas the only mention of Grant is a short review of Fruitvale Station.
If Trayvon Martin’s death made continuous headlines because of the exceptional brutality of his slaying—and the way his story thrust open our culture of racial profiling—consider, for a moment, the roster of other dead young black men whose similar stories have recently garnered attention only by association. “Is Jordan Russell Davis the new Trayvon?” asked the The Atlantic Wire in November, after the 17-year-old was shot eight times inside his parked car after an altercation over loud music. Though the shooter, a 45-year-old white man, bore no injuries, he has chosen, like Zimmerman, to plead not guilty to the slaying, telling officials that something about Davis made him “feel threatened.” Justin Patterson, a 22-year-old Georgia man, was killed while partying with his brother at the home of an 18-year-old friend whose uncle awoke, assumed the young men were raping his niece, and fired a few “warning” rounds. Patterson bled out in the yard while his brother ran for help.
Then there’s 13-year-old Darius Simmons who, like Martin, was slain, while walking in his Milwaukee neighborhood, by an older white man who accused the child of breaking into his home and stealing his guns. Simmons was, of course, without said guns, but law enforcement accepted his guilt so readily they questioned his mother for an hour and a half while her son died in a nearby hospital.
“These stories happen all the time,” Atlantic writer Ta-Nehisi Coates told The New York Times after Patterson’s death. “It’s heartbreaking and tragic, but there’s not much news coverage unless the circumstances are truly, truly unusual.” Perhaps the most telling revelation of Trayvon Martin’s death is that violence hinging on the assumption of a young black man’s criminality is rarely unusual enough to warrant the eyes and ears of the fourth estate.

You must have missed the part where Zimmerman was found by the jury to have acted in self defense. Perhaps if Martin didn’t think beating someone was an appropriate response for being disrespected, he would still be alive today.
While Grant didn’t deserve to die, its clear to anyone why watched the video of his shooting that Mehserle was genuinely surprised when his firearm discharged. He was obviously trying to reach for his tazer. Subduing someone who is high on fentanyl can be pretty tough.
Stow this white liberal guilt trip of yours, it isn’t doing anyone any good.
#1 Posted by Mike H, CJR on Wed 24 Jul 2013 at 09:34 AM
"Four years from now, we will likely remember the injustice of the Zimmerman verdict ..."
I don't care what every sane, discerning observer thinks of you. You're not an unhinged journalistic fraud. No! You in no way resemble a vicious, passive-aggressive, crybaby-racialist! Uh uh. No way. You are a model of "journalistic" excellence: standard CJR fare. Keep up the "good work."
#2 Posted by Dan A., CJR on Wed 24 Jul 2013 at 03:31 PM
Somehow I don't think it's white liberal guilt to be concerned about Trayvon and Oscar Grant and police brutality against black men.......it's civic and fundamental and badly underreported by the mainstream media.
The whole point is that it's not just a few cases.......targeted, unequal treatment of black men is endemic and system-wide and everybody knows it's true.
Great piece, Alexis Sobel Fitts! Thank you for writing about this.
#3 Posted by Kate Kroft, CJR on Thu 25 Jul 2013 at 03:54 PM