Frazier started the Guardian in 2005 to supplement what he saw as an insufficiently pugnacious local press. As he explained in an early post: “The local media depends on a friendly reception from the government and big business. This natural timidity combined with a profit motive leaves print, TV and radio news emasculated. (In English that means they don’t have any cajones.)”
Rather than deliver comprehensive coverage, Frazier investigates news stories he considers under-reported, like the high cost of lawmaker pensions or the payment of public money to a YMCA. He’s also a fan of stories ripe for cynical humor, like a local hockey team’s indecent exposure scandal. “That action put the team in the penalty box for a couple of weeks” is the sort of pun he favors.
Frazier sometimes sees results. The Guardian’s early investigation into corruption at a local waste facility ended in two arrests, building the site’s reputation right out of the gate.
Frazier’s gadfly act draws from a journalistic background. The ornery sixty-five-year-old requests public records, interviews sources, and tracks down facts. He’s also a third generation journalist. He began as a reporter, writing for Newsweek, Time, and The New York Times, but soon made the transition to photojournalism. He now owns a stock photo agency as his day job, and self-deprecatingly refers to the Guardian as “a hobby.” Nonetheless, he posts regularly and relies on donations to offset the costs of public records requests, gas, and legal fees. He has sued the city for records more than once.
It should be noted that although the Guardian’s fiscal muckraking has earned it a $3,000 award from the Tea Party-supportive Sam Adams Alliance, Frazier’s political stances fall outside of any party orthodoxy. His antagonistic reporting always focuses on specific projects rather than broad platforms. The Boise Guardian is unlikely to take a position on “environmentalism” as a whole, for example, but it will firmly oppose cyanide in the Boise River.
Frazier’s journalistic shoe leather, flippant tone, and intense scrutiny of institutions in his community have won a place for his blog in Boise’s media scene. The Guardian has managed to become a meaningful, if small, particpant in public discourse. Though the police department is no longer willing to send him press releases, Frazier is becoming increasingly hard to ignore.
BOISE, IDAHO — The Boise Guardian, a one-man muckraking blog in Boise, Idaho, has developed an outsized influence and a regular following, thanks to the energy of its proprietor/ reporter, Dave Frazier. No friend of city hall, Frazier has an Idaho court decision named after him. In 2005, he sued the city of Boise for taking out a loan on a new police station without first seeking voters’ approval for the bond. The city argued the station was an “ordinary and necessary expense,” but Frazier prevailed. 
While Mr. Frazier did have the lawsuit in 2005, the voters in Idaho decided to overturn his vicotry in 2011 with a majority vote that changed the Idaho Constitution, thus giving municipalities to approve bonds without voter approval, but don't let the facts get in the way of a good story.
#1 Posted by Cyclops on Thu 31 Mar 2011 at 06:19 PM
Cyclops is incorrect. A constitutional amendment was passed which exempted airports, public hospitals, and publicly owned power producers from a vote to go into debt, but NOT municipalities, counties, etc.
#2 Posted by Dave on Wed 28 Mar 2012 at 06:13 PM
Dave: What grabs me is, how can upper level Management support wage increases for Department Manager's, when the lower level workers are being told theirs no money in the budget for pay increases and their benefits might cease..can someone explain this to the concerned workers of the city of Boise Idaho..
#3 Posted by Charles McMillan on Sat 28 Jul 2012 at 11:31 AM