It’s been two weeks since Time magazine ill-advisedly named “You” as its Person of the Year, and we have to say, “You” aren’t exactly covering yourself in glory.
Well, not “You” exactly, but the massive, homogeneous, undifferentiated “You” that Time was referring to when it decided that the Internet, and the opportunity it presents to “build a new kind of international understanding, not politician to politician, great man to great man, but citizen to citizen, person to person” was worthy of its annual honor.
We get what Time was going for, and while the decision might have been a cop-out, and the prose a little purple — didn’t we read article upon article using the same language back in the late 90s? — we thought we’d check in to see what You’ve been up to.
And the results ain’t good. Over the last couple weeks, we’ve seen some blogs expend an enormous amount of energy attempting to shoot down an AP story out of Iraq, only to be forced to backtrack when it was discovered that they were at least partially wrong; worse than that, though — just for the sheer inanity of it — was the fierce ether-based debate over a picture of John Kerry in Iraq.
We’re not going to get in to all of the particulars, since you (You!) probably already know them, but suffice to say that both episodes are pretty embarrassing — but some commentary is in order, anyway.
As for the AP story, while Iraqi police captain Jamil Hussein has been found, what’s still uncertain is how reliable a source he has been, since no other news organization has been able to verify the story about six Sunnis being burned alive in Baghdad that started this whole mess. While a huge part of their criticism of AP — that Hussein doesn’t exist — has been shot down, that doesn’t mean that this fight is over. That a bunch of bloggers had to eat crow on the story (and are now busily shifting the terms of the debate), makes a whole bunch of “citizen journalists” look silly.
But that story pales in comparison to the pointless firestorm that accompanied a blogger’s mid-December publication of a picture of Senator John Kerry, sitting at a mostly empty table in a Baghdad military dining facility. A bunch of conservative blogs claimed it was proof that the troops were purposefully snubbing Kerry. A host of liberal blogs shot back, questioning things like the time stamp on the digital image and the flags visible in the background, all in an effort to prove that the photo wasn’t what it was said to be.
Well, it turns out that in the end, everyone was wrong about pretty much everything, and the whole episode was a gigantic waste of time. Kerry wasn’t being snubbed, but sought out an empty table to have a sit-down with two reporters. And all that blogging about the issue? Into the trash heap of history, merely another example of the self-referential, self-obsessed, circular firing squad that a big segment of the political blogosphere has become.
(Full disclosure: We jumped into the fray on the AP story, because after watching it unfold for a few weeks, it seemed that to the .01 percent of the American people who pay attention to this kind of thing, it was important. And it is. If a news organization can’t vouch for a source — or prove the source exists — that is, obviously, incredibly important.)
But the contretemps over the Kerry picture was, in contrast — or by any measure, really — staggeringly pointless. It encapsulated perfectly all the worst aspects of blogging, wasting time that could have been better spent talking about something of relevance.
These incidents come at the same time as a new Gallup poll, which found that after all the hype, and the crowing of some bloggers that they’re busily tearing down the walls of the MSM, one blog post at a time, twice as many news consumers in the United States “still rely on newspapers: 44% daily vs. 22% daily for Internet use.”

We shouldn't be talking about some undifferentiated "You" here. Both of the bogus stories Paul cites--as well as many other recent trumped-up stories in the blogosphere--are specifically the work of right-wing websites, whose standards of accuracy and ethics strike me as noticeably lower than those on the left. I don't think it's about being a blogger--I think it's about being part of the Republican attack machine.
Posted by kweberlit on Mon 8 Jan 2007 at 06:36 PM
THIS IS TOO FUNNY
The SAME screwy man who JUST called on the AP to come clean regarding the Jamil Hussein (or the six"burned" Sunnis) story is now labeling the ".01 percent" of the American population crazy...
For calling on the AP to come clean on the Jamil Hussein story!..
WHAT A FROOT LOOP!...
McLearyland is SUCH a fascinating place!...
Some screwy liberal writes
"We shouldn't be talking about some undifferentiated "You" here. Both of the bogus stories Paul cites--as well as many other recent trumped-up stories in the blogosphere--are specifically the work of right-wing websites, whose standards of accuracy and ethics strike me as noticeably lower than those on the left."
padikiller responds:
RIGHT...
You won't find any nutsiness on the lefty blogs!...
No 9/11 "truthers" telling us that Halliburton planes bombed the Pentagon...
No Katrina/genocide accusations about George Bush blowing up levees with dynamite...
Nothing of THAT type from the high-brow liberals!....
Well... To stick with REALITY here...
The right-wing blogs took down Dan Rather... And also got Reuters to kill nearly a THOUSAND Photoshopped pictures... By distrusting the MSM and by digging into the TRUTH... The fact that blogs are suspicious of the MSM is NOT the blog's fault.. And the fact that their suspicions sometimes turn out to be wrong doesn't mean that readers should blindly accept the claims of the biased MSM outlets...
The fact that conservative blogs hopped on the Kerry photo does NOT negate their utility... KERRY is the one who put his relationship (or lack of it) with the American troops into issue....
And the fact that Sen. Kerry, in this particular instance, apparently sat alone intentionally does NOT negate the fact that, according to many reports, he was overwhlemingly shunned by the troops he recently visited in Iraq.
Posted by padikiller on Mon 8 Jan 2007 at 07:02 PM
Anyone else have a comment?
Posted by Stecxjo on Tue 9 Jan 2007 at 04:24 AM
No. Only padikiller is allowed to comment.
Posted by not the senator on Tue 9 Jan 2007 at 09:36 AM
Paul - you mislead your readers by failing to acknowledge that both of the misleading blogger stories - Kerry and Hussein - were trumped up by right wing machines sites. You further fail to even mnetion that the person who got to the bottom of the Kerry photo story was a blogger at a left wing site (Greg Sargent at TPM Muckraker). Without this information, your post, frankly, just fails to tell an honest story, and instead becaomes yet one more in a long line of misleading, blame both sides, commentary.
it is this kind of "don't calla spade a spade" that allows the right-wing noise machine to hurt the media - and all of us - like it does. Tell the truth. Your readers will appreciate it.
Posted by Kathleen on Tue 9 Jan 2007 at 05:39 PM
HOLD THE PHONE!
NOW, it appears that the AP may have screwed up AGAIN!...
From Flopping Aces (the blog that first broke the story on the AP's "burned Sunnis" story)
"I've been in touch with Bill Costlow (the CPATT (Civilian Police Assistance Training Team) representative) since he has been back in-country and I have a few interesting developments on this story.
First, the AP story:
Ministry spokesman Brig. Abdul-Karim Khalaf, who had previously denied there was any such police employee as Capt. Jamil Hussein, said in an interview that Hussein is an officer assigned to the Khadra police station, as had been reported by The Associated Press.
But guess what Bill just confirmed? Brig. Abdul-Karim Khalaf never acknowledged that there was a Capt. Jamil Hussein assigned to the Khadra station, he confirmed to the AP that there was a Capt. Jamil Ghdaab Gulaim assigned there. Apparently he is the source for the AP even though he still, to this day (according to Bill Costlow), denies being the source.
STAY TUNED!
Posted by padikiller on Tue 9 Jan 2007 at 06:45 PM