Learn from Lehrer: Be realistic with assigning editors and bosses about what you can accomplish in a given amount of time so that you don’t feel pressured to slip in an unchecked fact or quote as you’re rushing to meet an unrealistic deadline. Don’t pitch ideas that are way-out-there and hard to back up with actual reporting. And learn from Shoals: Sometimes this industry is too demanding, and you’ll need to bow out into PR for awhile. One of the great things about this era of journalism is that nobody stays with one publication or in one role for too long. Things are always changing, and if your current job isn’t meeting your needs, you can probably find one that’s a better fit. Still, be prepared to maintain your Internet presence. And deal with some instability in the short term.
Can you please describe how an editor feels when yet ANOTHER writer misuses the word “literally”? —an editor literally named Julie

In need of some #realtalk? Email your questions, conundrums, and requests to editorrealtalk@gmail.com.
- 1
- 2
I'm going to love some things a la Mitt Romney:
I love the real talk. I love finding the silver linings. I love that you admit it's a little bit crass to say that thing about 'more work for us.'
Unfortunately the thing I hate the most about this industry is the feeling some have that others must be down for them to be up. Yes, it's tough out there, and no, this is not unique to journalism, but this is not a zero-sum game. Nobody wins unless everybody wins. Jersey out.
#1 Posted by Jack Bohrer, CJR on Thu 2 Aug 2012 at 03:38 PM
Lots of generalizations. Nice job on the gifs though!
#2 Posted by Tony R., CJR on Fri 3 Aug 2012 at 02:31 AM
I know it seems a bit pedantic for some, but one piece of language I’m trying to reform is the use of the term “work/life balance.” If language shapes our reality even just a little bit, then “work/life balance” – although its meant to be have positive connotations – must be reinforcing some negative views of life for all of us. Work and life are not somehow distinct “realities” that we can balance. “Work” is surely not meant to be devoid of “life.” Equally, considered, engaged and relational work can surely be part of a highly connected, health-ful life (even potentially a very big part of it). I know the term is coined to try to get us to live in a more “balanced” way but I suspect it simply allows those who see “work” and “life” as mechanically disconnected realities, to continue with that problematic viewpoint – and to continue tinkering with work to make it a “bit more friendly” rather than reforming the notion of work and its part in a whole life..
#3 Posted by Adrian Pyle, CJR on Sun 5 Aug 2012 at 10:42 PM
Yeah... You've got a point.
I haven't seen many articles about men facing breastfeeding or pregnancy problems, now that you mention it.
It's nothing but crass sexism!
But hey! Speaking of "crass"... With all the broads at home taking care of their babies, there's more CEO work for the rest of us, right?
#4 Posted by padikiller, CJR on Sun 5 Aug 2012 at 11:06 PM