“The Reconstruction of American Journalism” is an extraordinary report on the present and future of our profession, written by Leonard Downie and Michael Schudson, and commissioned by the Columbia Journalism School.
Their assignment was to take a comprehensive, clearheaded look at the enormous changes taking place in American journalism, to assess them, and to make recommendations for the future. Each of the authors is as deservedly well-known as anyone in the world at what he does: Downie stepped down last year after seventeen years as executive editor of The Washington Post, during which time the paper won twenty-five Pulitzer Prizes; Schudson, a MacArthur fellow, is a distinguished scholar of journalism and democracy, author of Discovering the News, The Good Citizen, Why Democracies Need an Unlovable Press, and other books.
What is unusual about the report, aside from the breadth of the authors’ original research, is that it focuses resolutely on a particular function of the press: what it calls “accountability journalism.” This, as the report points out, was not a part of the Founders’ original conception of the press as reflected in the First Amendment, but it has come to be a vital part of democratic life in this country, especially in those places that have had daily newspapers profitable enough, with owners public-spirited enough, to maintain substantial news reporting staffs.
The Internet, as the report makes clear, has brought the days when privately owned newspapers could be the main bearers of this reporting function to an end. Almost all major American papers have seen their profitability, and their reporting resources, shrink greatly. The report does not envision newspapers disappearing, but it also does not regard restoring newspaper staffs to their former size as possible. It looks forward to a new, mostly digital, era of news production, in which newspapers will continue to have a leading role, but as part of a much larger cast of featured players. In Downie and Schudson’s words, “It may not be essential to save or promote any particular news medium, including printed newspapers. What is paramount is preserving independent, original, credible reporting, whether or not it is popular or profitable, and regardless of the medium in which it appears.”
For reactions to The Reconstruction of American Journalism, click here.

Sorry folks, we need innovation around a business model for journalism. Government is not a business model and FCC fees are not innovation. More here http://bit.ly/4hxMXF
#1 Posted by Michele McLellan, CJR on Mon 19 Oct 2009 at 03:12 PM
A group of retired journalism people who are members of the Institute of Retired Professionals at the New School in New York are about to launch a course to be called "News Without Newspapers" that will explore the problem in pretty much the fashion this most excellent report has done.
Are there any suggestions for special projects the students might undertake? Also are there any volunteers out there who might want to address the group about their journalistic areas of experience? Are there any jjournalism students who might want to come visit with us?
#2 Posted by Walter Weglein, CJR on Mon 19 Oct 2009 at 03:34 PM
This matter--continuing independent reporting of the news, and free comment upon the news--is of the utmost importance to the Nation.
It's not really episodes like the NYT dropping a hundred reporters in the rest of 2009; rather, it is the total disappearance of medium and small news outlets here and there, nationwide, and the weakening or absorbtion of small papers where the community formerly served is like newly blind man: the town is familiar in outline but not detail, and the "meaning" of phenomena is now missing.
Our 20,000 person town's paper was bought and has had no editor (really, no publisher either) for several years. It republishes editorials from distant metropolitan papers, which involves all kinds of intellectual problems locally (though most don't realize that at all).
I have been reading the domestic urban press in the USA since I began delivering the Philadelphia Public Ledger in 1926. I had a peak of 300 plus subscribers to the Miami Herald in 1934-35. My mind profited from reading papers like the Macon Telegraph (1946); Chicago Tribune 1957-59; Los Angeles Times (1959-63); Oregonian (1963-2009); and Atlanta Journal and Constitution 1935-41. They molded my mind, sharpened it, framed it in many ways, informed me, were part of me, for sure. No, not the past tense!
A year of journalism at Emory (1936-37) was vital.
We MUST solve the problem of newspapers fading from view or becoming moribund. I wish the students in NYC good fortune. I suggest they each interview substantaive strangers on "What My Lifetime of Newspapers Meant to Me" (starting where I just did), and go ahead from there.
Good luck from a 92 year old who writes serious stuff daily even now.
VAUGHN DAVIS BORNET, Ph.D. Research Historian. Ashland, Oregon
#3 Posted by Vaughn Davis Bornet, CJR on Tue 20 Oct 2009 at 01:01 PM
This is not a plan for the future of journalism, it is an epitaph. Go begging for public funds. Sorry, there are better ideas around. We have to rethink the whole business, not scramble to save the scraps that the Internet Revolution has left behind. Want a start? http://www.rosenblumtv.com/?p=3778
#4 Posted by MIchael Rosenblum, CJR on Wed 21 Oct 2009 at 08:18 AM